Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, mcliu said:

If this is produced with ASML DUV immersion tools as speculated, then what to observe is whether ASML will stopping shipping DUV immersion tools as scheduled at the end of this year.  Also, will ASML continue supporting the installed DUV immersion tools in China?  If for some reasons, ASML stops supporting DUV immersion tools in the future, then these phones will become sort of "collector items."

Edited by zippy1
Posted
3 hours ago, sleepydragon said:


Japanese news usually have pretty read on Chinese affairs.  Look at the recent “spy” arrests by China, they are Japanese..

 

Anyway, at least the video of Li Keqiang still touring around, smiling andaccepting people’ applauding , that’s pretty unusual..in china

Did people forget Hu Jingtao got hauled away in front of the whole world not long ago? To think any elder can pressure Xi is just laughable.

Posted
3 hours ago, Parsad said:

 

Nooooo!  Speculation is speculation.  Nothing intelligent about it.  

 

Doesn't mean you can't do it though.  

 

Cheers!

 

 

All investing is, ultimately, speculation. All of it.

Posted (edited)

I had said earlier that I am seeing the news flow change in terms of negativity being less....

 

I saw this today confirming my own observations....can't vouch for what the stocks will do but news flow is less negative now...

 

image.png.8192fd8dc7f5afba626071040456db61.png

Edited by tnp20
Posted
Just now, stahleyp said:

 

 

All investing is, ultimately, speculation. All of it.

 

No, that's not right at all.  If someone offers you a $20 bill for $10, that's not speculation!  Cheers!  

Posted
24 minutes ago, Parsad said:

No, that's not right at all.  If someone offers you a $20 bill for $10, that's not speculation!  Cheers! 

 

Incorrect.

 

Your mathematical equivalent is 100% probability of betting $1 and likely getting $2.

 

But what about  a game where you bet $1 with a chance of earning speculatively $20 and there is 1 in 5 chance (20% probability)...if you do it 5 times, you are likely to get 4 times your return instead of a double.

 

I high light the word likely....as Its all probabilities, nothing is certain in life ...and the ultimate underlying reason for that is quantum mechanics.

 

 The issue is your expertise in correctly handicapping. One mans 1 in 4 is another man's 1 in 2...its what makes an investment market.

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, tnp20 said:

 

Incorrect.

 

Your mathematical equivalent is 100% probability of betting $1 and likely getting $2.

 

But what about  a game where you bet $1 with a chance of earning speculatively $20 and there is 1 in 5 chance (20% probability)...if you do it 5 times, you are likely to get 4 times your return instead of a double.

 

I high light the word likely....as Its all probabilities, nothing is certain in life ...and the ultimate underlying reason for that is quantum mechanics.

 

 The issue is your expertise in correctly handicapping. One mans 1 in 4 is another man's 1 in 2...its what makes an investment market.

 

 

 

 

 

Ah, no incorrect.  If I walk by and drop a $20 bill, and you pick it up, you have $20.  Nothing to do with quantum mechanics, handicapping or probabilities.  

 

Cheers!

Posted
9 hours ago, Parsad said:

 

No, that's not right at all.  If someone offers you a $20 bill for $10, that's not speculation!  Cheers!  

 

That isn't investing either. That is someone handing you money!

Posted (edited)

China is absolutely investible guys, especially with a long, long term horizon of 10+ years and with buying wide moat businesses. China will develop, so will their jurisdiction, they are on a level of a 1985 Germany on a per Capita Basis, reality will slap you in the face over time. 

Edited by Luca
Posted
1 hour ago, Luca said:

China is absolutely investible guys, especially with a long, long term horizon of 10+ years and with buying wide moat businesses. China will develop, so will their jurisdiction, they are on a level of a 1985 Germany on a per Capita Basis, reality will slap you in the face over time. 

China HAS developed over the past decades.  The issue is investors haven't been getting wealthy there, at least not from index funds.  Not worth the risk.  I have to worry a out corruption plus investment risk.

Posted

Just curious....how many would invest in Saudi Arabia ....ARMCO for example ?

 

Would you invest in Saudi Arabia and not China ? And if so what would edge Saudi Arabia over China ?

 

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, tnp20 said:

Just curious....how many would invest in Saudi Arabia ....ARMCO for example ?

 

Would you invest in Saudi Arabia and not China ? And if so what would edge Saudi Arabia over China ?

 

 

Saudi Arabia is a hot desert and technologically less advanced than China. But wouldnt mind investing there if id find something cheap. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, no_free_lunch said:

China HAS developed over the past decades.  The issue is investors haven't been getting wealthy there, at least not from index funds.  Not worth the risk.  I have to worry a out corruption plus investment risk.

That's because Chinese index funds for a long time were very heavy on shitty, low margin, commoditized industrial businesses or cyclicals that aren't conducive to buy and hold. If you invested in consumer/tech you would've made a lot of money over the past several decades. Buffett and Munger have both made a killing in China picking individual stocks, and I think that's the way to go with China, although the indices are probably cheap enough now that forward returns are decent.

Posted
37 minutes ago, no_free_lunch said:

China HAS developed over the past decades.  The issue is investors haven't been getting wealthy there, at least not from index funds.  Not worth the risk.  I have to worry a out corruption plus investment risk.

Considering that valuations are at rock bottom and if they go back to US/West levels, you would have results that have beaten the DAX. Many have gotten rich like Koos Bekker and chinese fund managers outperform hard...:)

Posted
21 minutes ago, Intelligent_Investor said:

although the indices are probably cheap enough now that forward returns are decent.

Definitely 

Posted
1 hour ago, no_free_lunch said:

China HAS developed over the past decades.  The issue is investors haven't been getting wealthy there, at least not from index funds.  Not worth the risk.  I have to worry a out corruption plus investment risk.

I think you just have to be careful and invest in the right companies.

 

Battery & cars:

image.png.e41d96d719472d1141afc8c3b3cdebc7.png

image.png.90480ad0b1c8e0f5bfed530f7a0a591f.png

 

Alcohol

image.png.a95846139390c0efb078ee9035a8798a.png

image.png.575fa86d281deb0b5e31567e08519e14.png

Posted
8 hours ago, stahleyp said:

 

That isn't investing either. That is someone handing you money!

 

Essentially that's what happens every so often.  People do ridiculously stupid things because they panic.

 

I bought Sears bonds in 2008 at 70 cents on the dollar.  Not bonds out a year or more...bonds that were out less than 3 months!  And at that time, Sears had enough cash on hand alone to cover operations and debt servicing for the entire year!

 

In March of 2020, I bought Biglari Holdings for $49, when book value was over $250.  They had ample securities to cover all expenses.  People were worried about the pandemic and SNS' debt...even though the debt was non-recourse...it was a dollar trading for 20 cents.

 

No speculation involved!  Cheers!

Posted
7 hours ago, tnp20 said:

Just curious....how many would invest in Saudi Arabia ....ARMCO for example ?

 

Would you invest in Saudi Arabia and not China ? And if so what would edge Saudi Arabia over China ?

 

 

 

No need to invest in either!  Like I said before, unless you are managing tens of billions, you don't need to go outside of NA.  Cheers!

Posted
17 minutes ago, Parsad said:

 

Essentially that's what happens every so often.  People do ridiculously stupid things because they panic.

 

I bought Sears bonds in 2008 at 70 cents on the dollar.  Not bonds out a year or more...bonds that were out less than 3 months!  And at that time, Sears had enough cash on hand alone to cover operations and debt servicing for the entire year!

 

In March of 2020, I bought Biglari Holdings for $49, when book value was over $250.  They had ample securities to cover all expenses.  People were worried about the pandemic and SNS' debt...even though the debt was non-recourse...it was a dollar trading for 20 cents.

 

No speculation involved!  Cheers!

 

That is still speculation dude. If the bailouts didn't occur, those could could have been money losers. I'm not saying it wasn't smart though. The world could have fallen apart either of those times. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Luca said:

Considering that valuations are at rock bottom and if they go back to US/West levels, you would have results that have beaten the DAX. Many have gotten rich like Koos Bekker and chinese fund managers outperform hard...:)

 

How do you trust the valuations and accounting?  I assure you that every Chinese company has two sets of books...one for the auditors and one for management!

 

What margin of safety do you apply for political risk or property seizure?

 

How do you certify Chinese inventory numbers?

 

Do you discount Chinese PPE or take it at face value?

 

What margin of safety protects from the inability to remove capital from China?

 

These are just a few reasons why I wouldn't invest in anything in China. 

 

Sure, it will grow and do well over time, but I'm at a huge disadvantage compared to investing in North America or Europe in terms of transparency and recovering my capital.

 

Cheers! 

 

 

Posted
44 minutes ago, Parsad said:

 

How do you trust the valuations and accounting?  I assure you that every Chinese company has two sets of books...one for the auditors and one for management!

Every company is a bit of a stretch, David Webb put it nicely: 

 

“Think of me as an expert mechanic, walking around a second-hand car lot in which there are no warranties, and all of them are discounted for the risk of being lemons,’’ Webb explained in a recent speech at The University of Hong Kong. By avoiding most of the lemons most of the time “and getting a substantial discount on good companies, I have been able to outperform.’’

 

Today we are getting very substantial discounts on very high quality and wide moat companies.

44 minutes ago, Parsad said:

 

What margin of safety do you apply for political risk or property seizure?

The margin of safety is in the valuations already!

44 minutes ago, Parsad said:

 

How do you certify Chinese inventory numbers?

Obviously its not on the same level as in the US but its also not that hard to find reasonably managed cheap companies that can be trusted in China. 

44 minutes ago, Parsad said:

Do you discount Chinese PPE or take it at face value?

Discount is already in the valuation as far as i see it.

44 minutes ago, Parsad said:

What margin of safety protects from the inability to remove capital from China?

Position sizing!

44 minutes ago, Parsad said:

These are just a few reasons why I wouldn't invest in anything in China. 

 

Sure, it will grow and do well over time, but I'm at a huge disadvantage compared to investing in North America or Europe in terms of transparency and recovering my capital.

 

Cheers! 

Fair enough Sanjeev! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...