Spekulatius

I think you are onto something and I think it boils down to momentum strategies (and derivatives of them) becoming more prevalent. For example, index investing is a strategy that is really a derivative or at least synergistic with momentum investing. Momentum is a strategy that has been working well for quite some time, but there have been times when it didn’t work, as I understand it The Meb Faber podcast on and off has talked about this and he himself likes strategies with a momentum factor.

Sounds like a clear ethics violation. Most public companies have an anonymous number for that. As a regular employee, you can and generally will fired for much less than that. As for disclosure, I think the answer is <$10k or <$100k. Below that, it’s a matter of corporate policies which should apply to everyone, including CEO‘s.

I do think these option plays change the structure of the market as they have to increase short term volatility around earnings etc. I think in general you want to be counterparty to the 0dte option retail players. My guess is that Renaissance and other quants feast on them.

He has to be ultimate hero of WSB.

This episode of Chit chat stockswith chipinvestor was fantastic on many levels. The Chit chat podcast is a iced bag with respect to the quality , but this episode really contains many nuggets due to the gues: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/chit-chat-stocks/id1437766060?i=1000671571744 The Nuggets: It’s not about AI, it’s about accelerated computing. INTC issues. Moats in tech is not a useful concept. Moat is a static concept while tech or growth business are dynamic. Think about management, tech leadership , vision, not moat in tech. The latter part really rung a bell with me. Buffett looks at business with moats because he basically tried to buy business wheee nothing changes. In tech everything changes within 10 years so a moat ( a static competitive advantage ) actually becomes a hindrance. You should really listen to that one yourself.

I like ELV the most. It’s basically a poor man’s version of UNH whith a pretty good execution and a more palpable valuation. Bought my shares in 2020 and then more in 2023. I am also a HUM bag holder but that has now become a multi year turnaround and perhaps takeover story. I also own some CNC and bought and sold that one a couple of times before, all with profits.

Reduced my LW position at about breakeven. Stock has recovered some after the earnings, but ai find both the business, the valuation and management uninspiring. I figured I was wrong getting involved in this stock in the first place. I probably sell down the rest as well.

I think most investor who make a lot of money make it with a a few great bets. @BG2008 Now that I read my post again, it comes across a bit more acidic than I intended. I hope you won’t hold it against me. i will buy you a beer or two, if we ever meet face to face. My post does contain a morsel of truth.I have some participation trophies in investing I can brag about too, like looking at HANS before it became a MONSTER. I even tested out their product at that time, which were natural fruit juices in cans. I did nothing and knowing this stock doesn’t even buy me a drink. That was in 2002 just before they launched the Monster energy drink. There is hoping I am going to be better next time I find a similar situation, but quite frankly, I am not sure. Investing is hard.

That’s a participation trophy in investing. A potentially valuable piece of information that one doesn’t use and makes no money with. I have plenty of those.

Roughly 90% of the portfolio is in Apple and Berkshire. This won’t outperform the SP500 by 30% without changes. I want to thank the @Ver for posting. Yeah, seems a bit scamy first, but this fellow Duan Yongping seems worth tracking. Looks like he made a boatload of money in Apple and Kweichow Moutai.

Bought a bit more PLX and HUM and RTO. A starter in SEB ( Graham type low P/B stock)

If this investor has been in the business for decades and compounds at SPY +30%, this investor would be worth tens of billions, if he started out with any meaningful capital. I am sure we would have heard from of him by now. The only investor with such a track record is renaissance and you can’t copy them.

I think the west can get a Ukraine to agree with territorial concessions in exchange for NATO membership and a shot to get in the EU. The problem will be if that works for Russia as well, because their fear of NATO expansion was supposedly what led to them attacking Ukraine. I think the likely scenario is a ceasefire rather than a peace deal. Russia may think they can prevent NATO membership just be keeping a low level conflict alive indefinitely , which they sort of have done since 2014. At some point, the west needs to make some gutsy decision to get solve this problem.

Bought a share in $LICT

The article or VIC thesis makes some good points. You can also add Lubrizol and PCP to the list of subsidies that seem to have fallen behind. I think the recently higher multiple in combination with Berkshire subs underperforming peers is a recipe for the stock underperform the index going forward.

If the Russians learned lessons in the 13 century, they forget them too like “mobility in warfare”. I think its interesting to look at historical background, but it only gets you so far. I think my simpleton view is that Putin sees himself as modern day czar, his pompous palaces and all that stuff. He dislikes that Russia became a backwater (just like the later czars) and wants to restore the Russian empire of the 19th century. The NATO with their open door policy is a threat because all the potential target countries join over time (latest are Finland and Sweden) which prevents him from executing his expansion plans, because the NATO is untouchable so far.

From my limited data looking at the CLT home market (a city with many Millenials moving here), they don’t want MPC’s either. They want to live close to the town, near public transport and close to restaurants - the work life thing. So what really is hot here is gutting out the 50’s and 60 ‘s ranch homes in certain areas with ~1300 sqft and creating the open floor plan they like. Guess what, older folks where kids moved out already like these homes too. The MPC and planned communities are too far out and without public transportation. They are for people with kids liking this lifestyle with pool, picket ball courts and all that.

One of my rules in politics and investing is to “watch what they do, not what they say”. What does Iran “beating drums” and doing absolutely nothing to support Hezbollah tell us?

At some point diplomacy will take over but I don’t think it’s now. Diplomacy typically takes place when either one side has won or when it’s very clear to both sides that they can’t win. To me, it seems that Russia believes it can win or at least that they can last longer than the western aid. Without western aid, Ukraine will collapse and it will become a Russian vassal state like Belarus . Putin knows that western states have elections and every elation is roll of dice for him and he can hope that sixes (for him) come up. That‘s not a problem he has to content with. So perhaps after elections, some means of diplomacy are more likely or perhaps the election solves the issue for him.

What we the metal shavings for? Aluminium for reduction? I want to repeat this experiment.

One of the greatest sketches ever:

Like always , we need to look at what’s happening rather than what XI saying. it is probably true , that an attack on Taiwan is not imminent, but there is no question that they regard Taiwan as theirs just like Russia believes Ukraine is theirs and sooner or later, we will see action, imo. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taiwan-reports-surge-chinese-warplanes-off-its-coast-2024-09-26/ Autocrats tend to do what they believe in over a long enough timeframe. In my opinion, the Chinese stock market surge should be sold (sell the rip, buy the dip) because China has a history or rips as the stock market it highly speculative and we have no idea if any of this action really sticks and Chinese really buying $5k handbags from stimmi funds. Much of this may be spent to buy defunct buildings and blow them up and to rescue banks with now worthless loans that need to be written off.

Yeah, that Rush piece is pretty good. When you watch the rush piece (which is real Hard Rock, imo) you can see the evolution from the early Hard Rock of 1970‘s Deep Purple (still a bit embryonic) to the 1976 Rush version. What I found happening now availability of music streamers and YouTube, that many musicians I glossed over because ai listened to a few things on record and just didn’t like then and never revisited again now check out again and like it a lot. RAMMSTEIN is one example where I downloaded their entire catalogue. I knew them more than 20 years ago, but their Metal wasn’t my thing. Now I find them awesome. I guess I just didn’t have the right mood when I checked out an album in a record store back then. Break out to the other side is one my favorite Doors records and yes the Organ makes the song so remarkable with it providing the sound harmonies and the beat at the same time. Awesome stuff.

I love this old restorations old performances on YouTube. This one is a classic from Deep Purple when hard rock as we know it was born : The vocals and the classic organ are awesome.

That seems like a rather simple view. NATO introduced a no fly zone which no doubt accelerated Gaddafi’s loss of power in 2011, but this may have happened anyways as a result of the Arab spring. The civil war started years later when the ruling party (basically the rebels that disposed of the Gadafinrefime) could come to terms and instead of resolving their difference piecefully decided to go into a full blown division war. Is this the US of Clintons fault? I don’t see it that way. It is true that the west was enthusiastic about the Arab spring and for the most part it didn’t work out, but is this the west fault or are these countries really not capable of running a democracy? Should they not even try? I think blaming Clinton for what happened is nonsense. I think it was right to help the rebel dispose of Gaddafi who was a major jackass and terrorist sponsor. I think it would be right to help an opposition on Iran to dispose of the Ayatollahs too when it can be done, especially since th e Engagement (No fly zone) was very limited in scope and duration. The outcome however isn’t predictable and we may end up at the same place but with different faces. C’eat la vie. But you can get lucky too if you roll the dice. Game of a thrones, here we come.