Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 422
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

https://www.ft.com/content/f0b621a1-54f2-49fc-acc1-a660e9131740

 

Quote

A lack of wind in Germany and the North Sea will push electricity prices in southern Norway to NKr13.16 ($1.18) per kilowatt hour on Thursday afternoon, their highest level since 2009 and almost 20 times their level just last week. “It’s an absolutely shit situation,” said Norway’s energy minister Terje Aasland.

 

If only if environmentalist lobby that has taken control of Germany could have foreseen the obvious consequences of eliminating base-load nuclear power. Now Europe will have to learn the hard way.

 

Quote

The ruling centre-left Labour party now says it wants to campaign in next year’s parliamentary election, set for September, to turn off electricity interconnectors to Denmark when they come up for renewal in 2026. Its junior coalition partner, the Centre party, has long demanded an end to the Danish connection and also wants to renegotiate existing interconnectors with the UK and Germany.

 

Unlike the EU, Norway has been very smart in its development of energy sources...

 

Quote

The issue is also causing deep alarm among EU countries keen to use Norway’s abundant hydroelectric power to help balance energy prices on the continent.

 

Quote

Norway is also western Europe’s largest petroleum producer and has replaced Russia for many EU countries as their biggest supplier of gas.

 

Edited by Dalal.Holdings
Posted

$JOST a stock I like from uninvestible Europe. They are the #1 for 5th wheels. (A real thing)  and other truck accessories .

$JOST. Roughly €6 in earnings (a bit less this year) and a goal to have €10 Euro in earnings for 2030. ~20% ROE due to asset light business model.  Sounds pretty cheap to me for €43 Euro stock.

 

https://www.jost-world.com/fileadmin/documents/pdfs/investor-relations/IR-presentations/2024/20241119_JOST_Werke_Investors_presentation_2024_-_November_2024_update_final.pdf

Posted
9 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

$JOST a stock I like from uninvestible Europe. They are the #1 for 5th wheels. (A real thing)  and other truck accessories .

$JOST. Roughly €6 in earnings (a bit less this year) and a goal to have €10 Euro in earnings for 2030. ~20% ROE due to asset light business model.  Sounds pretty cheap to me for €43 Euro stock.

 

https://www.jost-world.com/fileadmin/documents/pdfs/investor-relations/IR-presentations/2024/20241119_JOST_Werke_Investors_presentation_2024_-_November_2024_update_final.pdf

Their Hyva acquisition should give a nice fillip and can reach the €10 Euro in earnings in couple of years. Also their Asia margin (local production with cheap labour/material) is double that of rest of the world , should grow nicely with Hyva.

Posted

https://www.ft.com/content/39d8e496-ddd2-486d-9306-da699687ee9a

 

Quote

“You’re leaving the country in one of its biggest economic crises in postwar history,” said Friedrich Merz, the CDU party chief leading in the polls, in comments targeting Scholz ahead of Monday’s vote. “And you’re standing here and saying . . . let’s increase debt at the expense of the younger generation.”

 

Merz sounds like a fiscal hawk pro-austerity guy (not Keynesian). The German constitution also limits annual structural deficits to 0.35%. Not reassuring for Deutschland.

 

Why is Germany so stingy with fiscal spending?

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Dalal.Holdings said:

Merz sounds like a fiscal hawk pro-austerity guy (not Keynesian). The German constitution also limits annual structural deficits to 0.35%. Not reassuring for Deutschland.

 

Why is Germany so stingy with fiscal spending?


I would guess because devastating hyperinflation in Germany led to the rise of Hitler.

Edited by economonoc
Posted
6 hours ago, Dalal.Holdings said:

 

Who wants to take bets on whether this will ever come close to being a viable alternative to Starlink vs just a waste of $11B?

 

Europe is focused on the wrong priorities

Northvolt round 2

Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

The timeline is cherry picked but I wouldn't have guessed this to be the case

https://x.com/Hedgeye/status/1868070212190216492

 

I've seen similar metrics - but was like 1-2 years ago and didn't exclude NVDA but rather than Mag-7 (or was it FAANGM at the time?). 

 

Basically, similar to those handful of stocks driving the entire index while the equal weight index has been shit - it's a relatively similar story compared to int'l stocks. 

 

Doesn't mean much IMO. If you missed the mag-7, you missed the returns. It really doesn't matter what you bought instead - categorically everything else has been mediocre-ish - especially post-2021. I still like int'l because it's hated, it's cheap, and the currency may eventually be a tailwind. But it hasn't been working for years - but not because intl was bad. Because they weren't the nag-7 just like the rest of S&P 500 wasn't. 

 

Edited by TwoCitiesCapital
Posted
2 hours ago, TwoCitiesCapital said:

 

I've seen similar metrics - but was like 1-2 years ago and didn't exclude NVDA but rather than Mag-7 (or was it FAANGM at the time?). 

 

Basically, similar to those handful of stocks driving the entire index while the equal weight index has been shit - it's a relatively similar story compared to int'l stocks. 

 

Doesn't mean much IMO. If you missed the mag-7, you missed the returns. It really doesn't matter what you bought instead - categorically everything else has been mediocre-ish - especially post-2021. I still like int'l because it's hated, it's cheap, and the currency may eventually be a tailwind. But it hasn't been working for years - but not because intl was bad. Because they weren't the nag-7 just like the rest of S&P 500 wasn't. 

 

Yep, and these rocks are a highly correlated  with a lot of interdependency (AI trade etc), When you buy SPY you don’t really buy a highly  diversified index , you really make a tech trades that is based on just a few themes. The same was true in 2000.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

Yep, and these rocks are a highly correlated  with a lot of interdependency (AI trade etc), When you buy SPY you don’t really buy a highly  diversified index , you really make a tech trades that is based on just a few themes. The same was true in 2000.

 

Certainly food for thoughts, - nowadays.

 

Please, take care.

Posted

Interesting article by Martin Wolf in the FT about Europe: https://on.ft.com/4gDLw3D

 

Shows that the expansion of the EU to poorer countries has lead to increasing GDP per capita in those countries. Contrasts it with Mexico and Nafta where GDP per capita has gone backwards despite the opportunities supposedly afforded by its free trade agreements.

Posted (edited)

Trading with Putin and getting back the cheap NG gas. That’s basically what the AFD is asking for. What’s could go wrong? 

 

You would think that the Ossies had enough when they were occupied for 45 years by the Sowjets (and were none too happy when visited the DDR in the 80’s) , but I guess not. 

Edited by Spekulatius
Posted
2 hours ago, Spooky said:

Interesting article by Martin Wolf in the FT about Europe: https://on.ft.com/4gDLw3D

 

Shows that the expansion of the EU to poorer countries has lead to increasing GDP per capita in those countries. Contrasts it with Mexico and Nafta where GDP per capita has gone backwards despite the opportunities supposedly afforded by its free trade agreements.

 

The real problem in Mexico is that it is a failed state run by narco-cartels. Without the USA to send hard currency back to Mexico the government would likely fall.

Posted (edited)

The very smart people over at the EU thought they needed a viable alternative to GPS system, so they built $10B Galileo system which took over 20 years…

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/world/europe/galileo-outage.html

 

After all the spending and time/resources spent on this project, does anyone use it instead of GPS?

 

Even the Soviets were able to cut through their bureaucracy and achieve great things in space. The EU though?

 

EU gonna EU

 

Edited by Dalal.Holdings
Posted
3 hours ago, Dalal.Holdings said:

The very smart people over at the EU thought they needed a viable alternative to GPS system, so they built $10B Galileo system which took over 20 years…

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/world/europe/galileo-outage.html

 

After all the spending and time/resources spent on this project, does anyone use it instead of GPS?

 

Even the Soviets were able to cut through their bureaucracy and achieve great things in space. The EU though?

 

EU gonna EU

 

Your phone probably uses it. Higher precision than GPS.

Posted (edited)
On 12/14/2024 at 6:55 PM, Spekulatius said:

Europe may not be investable, but at least it can automate ports without politics interfering:

 http://www.hafen-hamburg.de/de/presse/news/neue-containerbruecken-fuer-den-container-terminal-burchardkai/

 

I hope you here were alluding and referring to Mr. Trumps post on Truth Social recently after his meeting with the longshore mens association about automation etc., @Spekulatius .

Edited by John Hjorth
Posted (edited)
On 12/14/2024 at 7:13 PM, Dalal.Holdings said:

https://www.ft.com/content/f0b621a1-54f2-49fc-acc1-a660e9131740

 

If only if environmentalist lobby that has taken control of Germany could have foreseen the obvious consequences of eliminating base-load nuclear power. Now Europe will have to learn the hard way.

 

Unlike the EU, Norway has been very smart in its development of energy sources...

 

@Dalal.Holdings,

 

For what ever reason I'm not able to quote the above post of yours, so it's also containing your quotes from the Financial Times article. So if our fellow board members want, really want, to understand what your post is about in detail, they will have to revisit it to read your actual quotes. For the  convenience of others, here is a screen shot of your full post :

 

image.thumb.png.f0ae70d3b8696f34c7d0ff7aa4250523.png

 

I take issue with your line of posting here, actually, because you quote socalled sources [to me personally, more or less consciously, or perhaps unconsciously, so to various degrees, depending on the specific content of your actual posts by and from you].

 

Where is your skeptisism and critical attitude towards your sources when posting in this topic? You obviously do not possess sufficient knowledge about the energy systems in the Nordics, how they operate, and how they interact and cooperate. Otherwise you woulden't have posted as you did above.

 

To me, the fact here is that somebody at Financial Times with absolutely no basic knowledge and understanding of the Nordic energy system grabbed a political headline in Norway from some Norwegian News Media, and 'brewed' a piece, a 'story' on it at Financial Times. And then you brought it in to CofB&F, at par, as if if it was a true and fair view of the situation.

 

I'm pretty sure this [the above] approach is not your modus operandi for information gathering while managing OPM.

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

Have you ever heard of Nord Pool ?

 

image.thumb.png.033468f554f3231e3a1d946304070d27.png

 

We actually have an energy exchange among us Nordic countries. 'Exchange' here not meant as 'in 'exchange money for a good, or physical, tangible item', but 'exchange' as in 'stock exchange', a place where buyers and sellers, producers of energy can meet to trade and agree on prices in an open and to all market participants, visible and transperant, way.

 

What do you think would happen [here, to Norway, in that respect], to this exchange, if Norway cut the line to Denmark?

 

Are you a proponent of protectionism? Or of trade and cooperation? How does this Norwegian political stuff and nonsence from a leftist make you think that Norwegian energy policy is smart?

 

Norway is by now known as 'Tesla-land'. The country and its citizens are incredible rich, and the country has the highest EV penetration of all countries. Every newborn is popped as a tripple millionaire in NOK by birth, reducing future tax burden, because of that.

 

They [Equinor] drill like hell in the Norwegian part of the continental shelf to get it look like a Swiss chease [for the purpose to sell oil and gas, and to tax Equinor separately, and extra]], and then they are 'green', driving Teslas, and throwing out all other oil majors and all kinds of other stuff from the Government Pension Fund Global [ www.nbim.no ] and everything is obviously fine, or is it really?

 

Where is Norway getting its energy from, when those water reservoires needs to be filled, or when there is drought in Norway?

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

So what you here actually have dragged in here at CofB&F, is really Norwegian, leftist and political spin and yelling on a given energy price situation, that happens from time to time, from a Norwegian leftist dumb head, who is politically elected, but have no clue of the matter at hand.

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

Here is a website, that for you may perhaps be useful for an interactive overview of the Nordic energy system :

 

EnergiNet : The energy system right now

 

image.thumb.png.ba6ad509da3ded25168cba506956db95.png

 

It's pretty cool, right?

Edited by John Hjorth

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...