Jump to content

dwy000

Member
  • Posts

    4,876
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

dwy000 last won the day on June 12 2023

dwy000 had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

dwy000's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

5

Reputation

  1. Would love to see how thats going to work if they're serious. They have $1.5bn of debt already and are still paying earn outs. To take private would probably require $2.2bn of capital and they dont have the cash flow to cover almost any of that using debt. It would also take them out of the acquisition market for years. They made a massive acquisition at peak multiples and have watched industry valuations halve. Probably a lot of very.frustrated insiders saying "do something"
  2. Maybe Putin should offer him a couple $bn to come to the table for an MOU.
  3. If the evidence fits! There is literally nothing Trump could do that you would claim is bad. Tell me, do you still support the caps on overdraft fees that Trump removed? Cult.
  4. What a cult!!! The fact that our current best option is vastly worse than having done nothing and youre tyring to hold it up as a win just shows how deeply the cult runs. We are going to release $bns, set up a $300bn fund for them, agree to get out of dodge, give up and reverse all sanctions and it has cost us $25bn and multiple lives in exchange for absolutely nothing - and youre spinning this as a win. Wow.
  5. I dont have a better solution. Im not a middle east expert. But as an American Im very much allowed to opine on how utterly horrible and embarrassing this solution is. And the fact that this might be the best option only reiterates how incompetent the administration who painted us into this corner is.
  6. We are not "paying" them is a technicality. We are releasing restricted funds back them. From their perspective they are receiving $bns of dollars for just coming to the table. The fact that we are arguing over how terrible this is and whether there are "better ideas" for a situation that we should not even be in is ridiculous. Its mind boggling incompetence.
  7. We got them to the table????? Thats considered a win now? The US, the world's largest super power, attacks a country and then has to pay them - not to give anything up, just simply to come to the table. Who cares if its a lump sum or over time. We are paying a country we attacked to talk to us. Not to mention what we want to talk about is how much more we will give them to simply go back to where things were 3 months ago! Sooooo embarrassing. This is beyond capitulation. The incompetence of this administration just cant find a bottom.
  8. That "little bit of money" is many multiples of the restricted funds Obama released and people freaked out about. For nothing. Literally agreeing to talk. The US is paying $bns to a country we attacked to come to the table and talk. That is just embarrassing for a supposed superpower.
  9. They are releasing restricted $ as part of the MOU. So Iran is getting paid to negotiate for 60 days regardless of outcome or if a deal gets reached. Thats a huge amount of leverage being given up. The rest of the terms are basically the US eliminating trade restrictions and setting up a $300bn fund for going back to where things were 3 months ago. There is literally zero that the US gains vs 3 months ago but they give up a ton. Countries and going to line up to go to war with the US if they get to negotiate outcomes like this!!
  10. Cuba should declare war with the US. They definitely need the money.
  11. If the deal was digitally signed on Sunday why are they waiting until Friday to release the details? And if they're sending JD Vance out there to fluff the media in advance without providing details, it really doesnt bode well.
  12. I would have put it the other way. Take an obviously stupid outcome and find a squiggly line to connect dots back to why this own-goal is actually a good thing and Trump intended that outcome even if its worse than before the action was taken.
  13. Especially when the MOU (which is an agreement to negotiate an agreement) isn't going to be signed for another 5 days.
  14. All of this is hopium. Trump has claimed a deal is close 39 times now. So you will forgive me if Im skeptical of both sides. Instead of pontificating over every word out of their mouths, how bout just ignoring it until its more than words.
  15. MOU? Is that like the last MOU? Or the one before? Or the one before that? An MOU that includes the fact that it isn't a deal, it's an agreement to work on a deal? Seriously? And all of this with the guy who renegs on every deal he signs?
×
×
  • Create New...