bizaro86 Posted Friday at 06:10 AM Posted Friday at 06:10 AM 3 hours ago, Pelagic said: Out of pure curiosity does anyone know why Exxon uses Moebd instead of the more common formatting of Mboed or mmboed? I figured it was a typo at first but it seems they use it in everything. Exxon does things the Exxon way. Even if there's no practical difference they'll never ever change because that's the Exxon way.
Stuart D Posted Friday at 07:35 AM Posted Friday at 07:35 AM 1 hour ago, bizaro86 said: Exxon does things the Exxon way. Even if there's no practical difference they'll never ever change because that's the Exxon way. One of my mates attended an Exxon Christmas party as a +1. Because he was an outsider they made him sit through a safety briefing. The safety briefing was a sermon glorifying The Exxon Way with bookends of the bathrooms & fire exit locations.
SharperDingaan Posted Friday at 04:03 PM Posted Friday at 04:03 PM (edited) On 12/12/2024 at 8:58 PM, Dalal.Holdings said: The thesis folks had was when the majors acquire the small shale players (like Exxon and Pioneer), they would show more restraint and rationalize production so that the U.S. supply boom that has driven prices down would end. Looks like Exxon is not going down that route… Lower production costs = higher margins at current prices, and shorter payback periods. At payback periods < 1 year; maintenance capex is self-funding, as current spend has been recovered by year-end; thereafter the well produces at marginal cost, and lowers average production cost across the reservoir (ie: USD 35/bbl). Reduce the depletion rate, find a home for the rising gas/water cut, and that marginal cost production will also continue for quite some time. Drill baby drill, DOES mean more drilling, but NOT more NET production. Tier 2 inventory is not as prolific as Tier 1, typically depletes faster, and has a higher gas/water cut. To simply maintain an existing production level, the hamster wheel has to speed up, which means more drilling. Drilling technology advancements can slow it down for a time, but it has limitations. The self-fund thing ??? If the payback period is 1 yr, 2024 maintenance capex is 400M, and 2025 maintenance capex is 440M ... the actual 2025 new cash requirement is only 40M (425-400), and that cash saving can go into debt reduction, buy-back, M&A, dividends, etc. SD Edited Monday at 06:35 PM by SharperDingaan
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now