Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, John Hjorth said:

 

This is the letter the SEC sent

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000000000022009598/filename1.pdf

 

Berkshire's response "As requested, we confirm that we will enhance future proxy disclosures in accordance with topics discussed in the Corp Finance Letter as well as to any material developments to Berkshire Hathaway's risk oversight structure."

Posted

It also asked Berkshire to address whether its lead independent director can override Buffett on risk matters or ask the board to consider them. 

 

Where in the world will you find somebody better than Charlie to do that? We have here the two most risk averse guys in corporate america and we have to find somebody to check them...

 

Hey Mr Buss you better find somebody who will teach Lebron how to play before giving him all that money!!! 😂

Posted
5 minutes ago, MarioP said:

It also asked Berkshire to address whether its lead independent director can override Buffett on risk matters or ask the board to consider them. 

 

Where in the world will you find somebody better than Charlie to do that? We have here the two most risk averse guys in corporate america and we have to find somebody to check them...

 

Hey Mr Buss you better find somebody who will teach Lebron how to play before giving him all that money!!! 😂

 

@MarioP,

 

Personally, I consider the question asked relevant. Let's see the Berskhire reply first, and then, let's discuss.

 

Posted

Berkshire's proxy should be out any day now.  I don't even know who they are calling the "lead" independent director these days.  At one point it was Gates.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, gfp said:

Berkshire's proxy should be out any day now.  I don't even know who they are calling the "lead" independent director these days.  At one point it was Gates.

 

Based on your post, @gfp,

 

I tried to look around on the Berkshire website, also out in the corners. All to no awail about determining ""lead" independent director".

 

Hum-ho, change gonna come.

Edited by John Hjorth
Posted
2 hours ago, John Hjorth said:

 

Based on your post, @gfp,

 

I tried to look around on the Berkshire website, also out in the corners. All to no awail about determining ""lead" independent director".

 

Hum-ho, change gonna come.

Isn't Susan Decker considered the lead independent director?

 

On another topic, how many shares of OXY do you think Omaha scooped up today?

Posted
11 minutes ago, ValueMaven said:

Added to BRKB in my Roth IRA (retirement account here in the US) at $297 ... personally, anything below $300 on the B's is very attractive to me.  

agree

Posted

From the Proxy:

 

As of the close of business on March 8, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting, the Corporation had outstanding and entitled to vote 590,238 shares of Class A Common Stock (hereinafter called “Class A Stock”) and 1,298,190,161 shares of Class B Common Stock (hereinafter called “Class B Stock”).

 

From the annual report: 

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock: February 13, 2023—Class A common stock, $5 par value 590,835 shares February 13, 2023—Class B common stock, $0.0033 par value 1,301,100,243 shares

 

So if my math and understanding is correct they repurchased 597 class A shares and 2,910,082 class b shares between  feb 13th and march 8th. That would mean WEB spent around 1.1 Billion in 20 trading days and Berkshire has only gotten cheaper since March 8th. Hopefully WEB is still buying back shares.  

Posted

Thank you, @yesman182,

 

Good one. Thanks for sharing the calculation. Yes, let's hope Berkshire really starts shovelling shares in while the stock is following the market downwards, in periods of time even below 300 for the B.

 

And your post also informing us the proxy is here.

Posted
9 hours ago, yesman182 said:

From the Proxy:

 

As of the close of business on March 8, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting, the Corporation had outstanding and entitled to vote 590,238 shares of Class A Common Stock (hereinafter called “Class A Stock”) and 1,298,190,161 shares of Class B Common Stock (hereinafter called “Class B Stock”).

 

From the annual report: 

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock: February 13, 2023—Class A common stock, $5 par value 590,835 shares February 13, 2023—Class B common stock, $0.0033 par value 1,301,100,243 shares

 

So if my math and understanding is correct they repurchased 597 class A shares and 2,910,082 class b shares between  feb 13th and march 8th. That would mean WEB spent around 1.1 Billion in 20 trading days and Berkshire has only gotten cheaper since March 8th. Hopefully WEB is still buying back shares.  

 

Yep, that is right - about $1.16 Billion worth between 2/13 and 3/8 if you use $305/B-share as a guess on avg. cost.

 

Similarly, about $1.845 Billion worth of repurchases since 12/31 if you use $305/B-share as an avg. cost.

 

3/8 share count is 2.183547 Billion B-share equivalents ($641 Billion market cap)

3/8 share count is 1,455,698 A-share equivalents.

Posted
10 hours ago, yesman182 said:

From the Proxy:

 

As of the close of business on March 8, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting, the Corporation had outstanding and entitled to vote 590,238 shares of Class A Common Stock (hereinafter called “Class A Stock”) and 1,298,190,161 shares of Class B Common Stock (hereinafter called “Class B Stock”).

 

From the annual report: 

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock: February 13, 2023—Class A common stock, $5 par value 590,835 shares February 13, 2023—Class B common stock, $0.0033 par value 1,301,100,243 shares

 

So if my math and understanding is correct they repurchased 597 class A shares and 2,910,082 class b shares between  feb 13th and march 8th. That would mean WEB spent around 1.1 Billion in 20 trading days and Berkshire has only gotten cheaper since March 8th. Hopefully WEB is still buying back shares.  

If I remember correctly, someday after 3/8 I was looking at A shares’s volume, and noticed its ADV was higher than its historical ADV. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...