Gregmal

You didn’t vote for him so no one cares what you say about “the reasons someone voted for him”. You did vote vote for Biden who you never once complained about regarding the Epstein files. Despite both Biden and Obama being “named” in the files…which according to the deranged, is all you need to assume guilt

Please Sanjeev. You’re a finance guy. Granted BC is like the minor leagues compared to NYC, especially in the 80s/90s/2000s, but you seem to travel well….you want to be accountable for every hand you’ve shaken, warm body you’ve had a meeting with or been in the same room at a meeting with? Every person who you’ve gotten and email from or sent one too? Cuz that’s basically the bar here. And as you can see, some of them get pretty stiff in the Hanes at the thought of “getting Trump” regardless of the collateral damage. And also the pretty amusing fact that even as Charlie has said, how many people might get irreparably harmed unnecessarily while Trump likely skates away better of…

Nothing to be surprised by. Sadly, I had no doubts they’d be willing to exploit child sex trafficking victims and likely a bunch of innocent people in their quest to “get Trump”. I mean the crux of the thesis was that they knew the law better than state and federal law enforcement officials and that “anyone who’s ever come into contact with JE must be outed as a perpetrator”….i mean they were willing to collude with Mr Epstein to “get Trump”….theres virtually nothing they won’t do as their mental illness leads them into the abyss.

God damnit Reds, you had to say Beetlejuice! Anyway, something interesting just in light of the timelines and narratives. 2004-2026…Bush, Obama, Obama, Trump, Biden, Trump. What, when, and where on that timeline was any sort of anything progress or justice wise done about Epstein? Cuz from what I can see there were both zeros and complete silence during both Obama terms and the Biden one. Arguably even a corrupt and high level sweetheart plea deal cut during one of them….Only real substance in terms of action was about 2-3 years into Trump term one, and then less than a year into Trump term two. Despite all the hissy fits from the silent folks during those other broad stretches of time…

You had a sense of humor attached, so I assumed it was Charlie. When John reprimands me I feel like I’m getting a ruler to the back of the head from a Catholic school nun!

Laughing at people complaining about something when clearly they’re just emotionally handicapped and/or ignorant? Would consider it more of a compassionate enlightenment. Maybe next time they don’t get so up in arms about something with such a clear cut statute? Or do we give them the benefit of the doubt because they read it on the Daily Beast or Twotter?

And to what degree are people not aware that these sort of guardrails already exist? I mean the amount of just plain wrong or outright laughable assumptions declared in the last few days is downright hilarious. Many didn’t even know this was a law and thought they were revealing smoking guns and gotchas cuz “there’s a report he went to a hockey game”. Im fairly certain that 1) it makes sense for this mandate at high levels…so we agree. 2) there’s probably guidelines for this already. 3) Kash isn’t the first to use travel private for personal reasons…again, it’s required for personal travel too. So obviously there’s something unique about him that really causes the complainers to be triggered. It’s pretty obvious what that likely is. Just such a glorious display of ignorance here by many.

Yup. So like many complaining here, Kash was either being dishonest there, or just ignorant in not knowing the laws. Anything for some good social media material it seems! Personally, I’d be fine if they scrapped this rule, or stopped following. But we all know that if later today Trump announces he’s scrapping the mandate for certain officials to fly private, there would be an emotional tidal wave of “I’m not supporting government waste BUT……”….

No clue. Honestly never gave the subject any thought until today when it seems a bunch of brainwashed libs started losing it over Kash because at first they just didn’t know that it was a law(aha! Smoking gun! He visited his gf lol) and now are just covering their tracks with the same old, same old nonsense. “We never cared before because this is the first time in history it’s happened!”….

You guys never once, like literally not one single solitary time, cared when it was a white FBI director flying all over, at will, on a private plane. Just calling it out that yall are triggered by the brown Republican in a pretty epic and hilarious way.

You guys just seem irrationally triggered. And as has been pointed out, this has become routine. Different day, different hissy fit. Same underlying illness. It’s already been explained to you. At first there was crying because you guys didn’t know that the law mandates certain dept heads fly private. Ignorant as always. Now you’re just making up theoreticals to support the lunacy…IE “I bet he won’t reimburse them” lol

I mean this is the depth of how stupid they are…Congress has mandated that the FBI Director fly private. If they had an issue, much like with all the other flavor of the day tantrums they’ve been having, surely we d have heard them whining about this before? But of course we havent…. We certainly didn’t hear their whining about Wray or any previous FBI heads, doing what Congress mandates they do. It’s hard to believe they get this deranged and angered over a brown dude going to the Olympics lol such losers

We were and much of these same turdballs raged about it and undermined it anyway they could. This was the daily “Feb/March 2025 hissy fit” from a year ago. And of course, just like with everything, they wailed that… they’re not “supporting Maduro”, “violent crime”, “government waste”, etc, before arguing in support of it anyway….but as they say, everything before the word but is bullshit. They’ve done all these things in the name of having their daily “oppose Trump” tantrums. Also, since we re all of a sudden so interested in the subject, a reasonable person should bother querying whether or not it is a requirement for such a person to be traveling private, which if I am not mistaken, the FBI director is one such person who’s required to do this. It is also my understanding that in the event that they do so for personal matters, they are required to reimburse the agency for the expense. But you don’t learn that from Rachel on MS Now or Charlie 2.0 On Twotter.

LOL. What are you even talking about John? I feel like every so often you do one of these random headscratcher "things", like last week blasting someone whom sent their condolences and well wishes to Guy Spier, for no reason at all....are you the board principal? On the topic at hand...its already been discussed...outside of the usual whiny liberals, and the guy Spek requoted from Twitter, not many even noticed, nor cared one bit in the context of what was occurring during the Olympic gold celebration...to whine about politics....

Well, most people don’t view this as political, and I’m not sure a bunch of whiny liberals or the Charlie Kirk wannabe Spek follows being triggered by this make it political either.

See thats the thing though, most people, myself included, especially those whom watched it live, saw the locker room celebration and didn’t think twice of anything other than “wow this is pretty awesome”…then there’s the degen lib faction that doesn’t need an excuse to wake up in the morning angry about something, and apparently this is what they took from it lol.

You might be lost. I said it’s bizarre, but not surprising, that this is what the usual suspects are choosing to have their daily hissy fit over.

It’s also been customary in many sports, for like decades, that the POTUS has someone from the administration connect with the winners for a congratulatory call. I really just think the collective imagery here was too triggering for them….

Well, some just always need something to be unhappy about it seems. Most were talking about how awesome the game and tournament was. Then there were others whom seemed quite perturbed cuz the brown guy was in the locker room. Even though the context was simply that he had POTUS on the phone congratulating the team which was conveniently left out of those infuriating clips.....Of all the things to be bothered by....

Sure, just think it’s fairly crazy, downright bizarre, from the top down, looking at something that should be universally celebrated here in America, and there’s folks, not just Charlie Kirk wannabes on Twitter, but beyond that, all angry cuz the FBI director was in the locker room celebrating. If you ask me “should the FBI director be at the olympics”(or further, in the locker room) my general, two second thought would probably be that it doesn’t “not” make sense, followed by an indifference to such a thought in the context of everything. There’s people that just always seem to need to be angry about American success and pride. There’s definitely a big faction of liberals who are on sensory overload there, seeing the American flags(that they think are triggering and racist), a team of almost exclusively young white men(a segment of the population they have openly had disdain for going on decades now), and a brown guy who rejected their ideology and is now “in bed with the enemy”(there’s few groups the liberals have more reserved vitriol for than non whites whom don’t toe the line)…is this picture of American success really that triggering for them? Why couldn’t they just enjoy it?

Well let’s say there was a security incident, such as a fairly famous one that happened in Munich, your party would probably be shouting “why wasn’t the head of the FBI there” while also doing what they have a history of doing, and that’s cheering on the tragedy/violence. The “privileged” and affluent white winter Olympians representing this horrible country…some of us support them!

Well throw in an anti-Semitic slur and you get a t-shirt at the next DSA rally in NYC.

Well, they tried DOGE and you guys lost your marbles. Now you believe that the Olympians representing our country don’t deserve security details because a lot of them are white or something…. And pissed off a brown guy heads the FBI.

I think the underlying frustration regarding the men’s hockey team getting security detail is enlightening. Liberals generally hate America. They hate sports and they especially despise sports like Winter Olympic ones where there’s less diversity. They’re mad Patel isn’t the typical subservient colored man they bank on. Seeing him have a beer with a successful bunch of white athletes and not a Soy Latte with the SanFran girls volley ball team was just too triggering and they lost it.

LOL I can’t think of much that better sums up the failures of the libtards, in terms resonating with the average person, than something like this. Some effeminate, Charlie Kirk wannabe grifter, thinking he’s dunking on the FBI director for….having a beer in the locker room with the national hockey team after winning gold at the Olympics?