Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, kab60 said:

Yes. It has been 40 years of bad headlines and ever increasing FCF/share for Altria. I think the current valuation look almost too good to be true, not least considering the broader market and potential for inflation, but I feel like I might be missing something big. It's almost too easy if it's just headline risks and ESG turning investors away.

 

I often find those two points to be bad excuses for underperformance, but I can't really figure out a scenario where one loses money on MO longterm from these levels (I think the biggest risk is dumb capital allocation, and even that seems to have been derisked with some sounds decision recently - selling wine biz, launching (small) buybacks).

 

While we could be missing something as far as business is concerned, I think the likely explanation that fund flows into tobacco equity is negative because ESG and investment mandates exclude more and more investors from owning them.

I know quite a few investors who would never own tobacco /nicotine stocks (for ESG or other reasons) and actually Berkshire is one of them. I actually think it is possible that this changes when Buffett is not around any more.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Pistachio_Lawyer said:

Anyone else hoping BABA will drop below PE 15 so they load up on some more? 

People have been clamoring about how cheap BABA is for $100 a share now. BABA as an investment has nothing to do with the company's PE at this point in time. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Gregmal said:

People have been clamoring about how cheap BABA is for $100 a share now. BABA as an investment has nothing to do with the company's PE at this point in time. 

 

I write this half hoping you’re capable of reading comprehension, but my original statement had to do with people on this forum buying more

as it gets cheaper

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Gregmal said:

Oh hello there AIV 23 and 24 leaps. I feel like we're gonna have some fun together soon. 

Ha - just saw someone getting 100 (looks like a 90 and another 10 contracts) 7.5C at 1.90. I'm assuming it was you. Curious who is selling these though.

Posted

^Haha Im not going in hard yet cuz Ive found when a new set pops up it takes a short while for the spreads and market for them to firm up. But these are absolutely, exactly what I want. Wish APTS had these. 2024 is the year the board de-staggers as well. Basically, by then the company will be up for grabs and free and clear to the highest bidder if shit does play out properly. Current NAV is likely mid teens. 

Posted
On 10/2/2021 at 7:58 AM, formthirteen said:

Bought ASC.L and BOO.L a couple of weeks ago. So far, not good. In ten years, let's see. At least I seem to have enough conviction to hold both stonks through this drawdown.

Can to put some words on your thesis?

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, kab60 said:

Can to put some words on your thesis?

 

ROE/ROIC + yuge revenue growth = profit 5-10 years from now?

 

Both are global software and advertising businesses.

 

ASOS 10-year median ROE (20%), ROIC (20%), and revenue growth (31%), P/E ~20 seems "OK", price seems low if if we extrapolate from past numbers:

https://quickfs.net/company/ASC:LN

 

NTM EV/EBIT multiple ~16 near a ten year low.

 

BOO growing faster and is more expensive: https://quickfs.net/company/BOO:LN

 

Nick Sleep.

 

Problems: ESG, inflation and labor costs, competition, management (BOO).

 

 

Edited by formthirteen
Posted
5 hours ago, formthirteen said:

 

ROE/ROIC + yuge revenue growth = profit 5-10 years from now?

 

Both are global software and advertising businesses.

 

ASOS 10-year median ROE (20%), ROIC (20%), and revenue growth (31%), P/E ~20 seems "OK", price seems low if if we extrapolate from past numbers:

https://quickfs.net/company/ASC:LN

 

NTM EV/EBIT multiple ~16 near a ten year low.

 

BOO growing faster and is more expensive: https://quickfs.net/company/BOO:LN

 

Nick Sleep.

 

Problems: ESG, inflation and labor costs, competition, management (BOO).

 

 

This may be an incredible stupid question but after looking a bit in this space (and particularly Boo. L) what is the ESG concern here?

Posted
12 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

This may be an incredible stupid question but after looking a bit in this space (and particularly Boo. L) what is the ESG concern here?

 

Ultra-fast fashion is not environmentally friendly. Automation and minimizing labor costs is not socially responsible (according to socialists). BooHoo might have some governance issues according to Shadowfall's short report: https://t.co/Ejhc1DbCv9?amp=1

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, ERICOPOLY said:

 

5% position.  June 2022.

Thanks Eric!  Is that 5% of capital at risk?  Also what strike? I really appreciate you sharing the details. 

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, BG2008 said:

Thanks Eric!  Is that 5% of capital at risk?  Also what strike? I really appreciate you sharing the details. 

 

Yes.  Potential for 5% of capital vaporized.  

 

Strikes are $70, $110. $140.

 

 

 

Edited by ERICOPOLY
deleted $115 due to misremembering
Posted

Eric, I assume given the deep ITM/ATM options, you would like to hold BABA for the long term? Otherwise, why not buy further OTM calls for more leverage?

Posted

LOL Meanwhile, a good percentage of folks are scared to go 5% on a single, non controversial STOCK! Not to mention the numerous financial literature and textbooks that tell you 5% is too risky. Just shows how the system is designed to keep people poor and reliant on financial services. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, LC said:

Eric, I assume given the deep ITM/ATM options, you would like to hold BABA for the long term? Otherwise, why not buy further OTM calls for more leverage?

 

I might do that yet.  This is my first purchase of a Chinese stock ever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...