james22 Posted May 20, 2025 Posted May 20, 2025 18 minutes ago, Buckeye said: It would be interesting to see this graph with dollar figures. Yeah, and overlap and distribution.
Milu Posted May 21, 2025 Posted May 21, 2025 1 hour ago, james22 said: ATH Many more to come over the coming years and decades.
Paarslaars Posted May 21, 2025 Posted May 21, 2025 1 hour ago, james22 said: ATH Only in USD though, still way off in EUR.
rkbabang Posted May 21, 2025 Author Posted May 21, 2025 15 minutes ago, Paarslaars said: Only in USD though, still way off in EUR. USD/EUR is down 8.77% YTD.
Paarslaars Posted May 21, 2025 Posted May 21, 2025 Yeah I know, I am a European with 80% of his portfolio in USD, pretty painful these days.
james22 Posted May 25, 2025 Posted May 25, 2025 Speaking at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas this week: JD Vance Eric Trump Donald Trump Jr. Cynthia Lummis
John Hjorth Posted June 5, 2025 Posted June 5, 2025 Today, I - unsolicited -, got hit by an e-mail from Truth Social linking to this message from GlobeNewswire, the e-mail quoting parts of it : GlobeNewswire [June 5th 2025] : Trump Media Files Registration Statement for Bitcoin ETF.
Milu Posted June 8, 2025 Posted June 8, 2025 Interesting family https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/06/07/bitcoin-family-crypto-security-kidnappings.html
gfp Posted June 10, 2025 Posted June 10, 2025 Back in March 2020 I shared this conversation with my neighbor from the front porches. The exact day of the conversation ended up being the exact market bottom for equities. For the record, this same neighbor told me yesterday, "I sold all my crypto! I own zero crypto." Hmmmm...
Paarslaars Posted June 10, 2025 Posted June 10, 2025 Right before we really get this bull run started.
rkbabang Posted June 11, 2025 Author Posted June 11, 2025 I'm becoming a big fan of the Inverse gfp's Neighbor Strategy.
Libs Posted June 11, 2025 Posted June 11, 2025 Thoughts on this risk? https://theweek.com/tech/bitcoin-crypto-quantum-computers-dangers?refid=75FFC898AD6883CBB120FC6A86C62323&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=afternoon_newsletter_20250609&utm_source=afternoon_newsletter
Hektor Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 https://ir.americanexpress.com/news/investor-relations-news/investor-relations-news-details/2025/New-Coinbase-One-Card-to-Launch-on-the-American-Express-Network/default.aspx New Coinbase One Card to Launch on the American Express Network
Buckeye Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 With Bitcoin currently priced around $105,000 USD and approximately 19.87M Bitcoins in circulation, the Bitcoin “Market Cap” is ~ 2.2T. If every BTC holder decided tomorrow that they wanted to cash in their Bitcoin, how much of that 2.2T is actually available to be paid out as cash? I would assume all 2.2T, correct? And if there is a difference between the 2.2T and how much could actually be cashed out, what’s happened to the difference?
Milu Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 16 minutes ago, Buckeye said: With Bitcoin currently priced around $105,000 USD and approximately 19.87M Bitcoins in circulation, the Bitcoin “Market Cap” is ~ 2.2T. If every BTC holder decided tomorrow that they wanted to cash in their Bitcoin, how much of that 2.2T is actually available to be paid out as cash? I would assume all 2.2T, correct? And if there is a difference between the 2.2T and how much could actually be cashed out, what’s happened to the difference? Not quite sure thats how markets work haha. If every holder of any asset (Gold, Apple, Berkshire) decided to sell the asset tomorrow then unless there was a similar horde of people looking to buy the asset, then the price would obviously continue dropping until a floor in the price was made. Not sure what type of point you are attempting to make. Nothing ever gets 'cashed out'. Anytime somebody sells an asset then there is obviously a new buyer that then owns the asset.
Gregmal Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 3 minutes ago, Milu said: Not quite sure thats how markets work haha. If every holder of any asset (Gold, Apple, Berkshire) decided to sell the asset tomorrow then unless there was a similar horde of people looking to buy the asset, then the price would obviously continue dropping until a floor in the price was made. Not sure what type of point you are attempting to make. Nothing ever gets 'cashed out'. Anytime somebody sells an asset then there is obviously a new buyer that then owns the asset. I think the overriding logic is that there's different rules for "real" assets, and "fake" assets. Same way Tesla having a few years of trading sideways is "evidence" of the jig being up, but Fairfax have a lost decade was just part of "investing".
tooskinneejs Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 14 minutes ago, Milu said: If every holder of any asset (Gold, Apple, Berkshire) decided to sell the asset tomorrow then unless there was a similar horde of people looking to buy the asset, then the price would obviously continue dropping until a floor in the price was made. Not sure what type of point you are attempting to make. That may be exactly the point being made. It's value is based entirely on perception with no underlying intrinsic value.
Buckeye Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 Not trying to prove anything, just wondering out loud. Obviously the example is extreme, but it still seems like a valid question/thought exercise. I can see the obvious difference between Apple/Brk and BTC because that’s a little like comparing apples to oranges. So it sounds like there may not be $105,000 of cash backing every Bitcoin? Am I understanding that correctly?
Buckeye Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 12 minutes ago, Gregmal said: I think the overriding logic is that there's different rules for "real" assets, and "fake" assets. Same way Tesla having a few years of trading sideways is "evidence" of the jig being up, but Fairfax have a lost decade was just part of "investing". I’m not trying to make any of those points. It seems like if the BTC market cap is currently worth 2.2T, that’s 2.2T of people’s/investors money, correct? So 2.2T in cash has been “invested” into BTC, correct? And if so, how much of that 2.2T in cash would actually be available to be paid out to those investors? I would think there should be 2.2T and if there is a difference, why is that? Seems like a fairly straightforward question.
RichardGibbons Posted June 13, 2025 Posted June 13, 2025 6 minutes ago, Buckeye said: So it sounds like there may not be $105,000 of cash backing every Bitcoin? Am I understanding that correctly? This is a bit of an odd thing to say. I find it challenging to think of assets with a value of $X with an actual guarantee to be exchangeable whenever you want for $X dollars.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now