Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Parsad said:

 

No need to invest in either!  Like I said before, unless you are managing tens of billions, you don't need to go outside of NA.  Cheers!

Aramco looks overvalued, not sure I got this right. If it paid 15% dividend yield and traded in an exchange I could actyhually buy it, I would think about it. Even then, I think PBR-A is actually a better investment.

image.png

Edited by Spekulatius
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Libs said:

https://www.ft.com/content/91b7b634-9f63-4f5b-9cd4-3b838b9b51e7

 

Yuan hits 16- year low. Good luck with that 'world's currency' thing.

 

Well I don't think the fact that it isn't particularly strong vs. the USD is what is keeping it from becoming the "new reserve currency" or whatever.  It is sort of amusing how it was all the rage to label China "currency manipulators" and talk about how unfair it was.  But here we are with the Chinese government, through directives to the major Chinese commercial banks to re-lend and recirculate dollars, manipulating the currency daily to try to keep it stronger.  Markets are not convinced.

 

USD-CNY and USD-JPY has been a very tight correlation lately.  A lot of dollar funding in Asia comes through Japan or by transforming Japanese collateral into USD-denominated monetary instruments, derivatives, etc...  Indian Rupee will be taken along for the ride.  *I'm sorry, Bharat, old habits die hard

Edited by gfp
Posted
36 minutes ago, gfp said:

 

Well I don't think the fact that it isn't particularly strong vs. the USD is what is keeping it from becoming the "new reserve currency" or whatever.  It is sort of amusing how it was all the rage to label China "currency manipulators" and talk about how unfair it was.  But here we are with the Chinese government, through directives to the major Chinese commercial banks to re-lend and recirculate dollars, manipulating the currency daily to try to keep it stronger.  Markets are not convinced.

 

USD-CNY and USD-JPY has been a very tight correlation lately.  A lot of dollar funding in Asia comes through Japan or by transforming Japanese collateral into USD-denominated monetary instruments, derivatives, etc...  Indian Rupee will be taken along for the ride.  *I'm sorry, Bharat, old habits die hard

The problem with CNY is that they soft-peg their currency against the USD, but not their monetary policy. Currently China is lowering interest rates and otherwise easing money supply while the US is still tightening. That puts pressure on the USD-CNY ratio naturally.

 

The bigger problem with CNY becoming a reserve currency is that it's not freely exchangeable in other currencies. You can get your money in the Yuan easily, but you may not be able to get it out.

Posted (edited)

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-08/rahm-emanuel-s-musing-about-china-leaders-stirs-new-controversy?srnd=premium-europe

 

“President Xi’s cabinet lineup is now resembling Agatha Christie’s novel And Then There Were None,” Emanuel wrote. “First, Foreign Minister Qin Gang goes missing, then the Rocket Force commanders go missing, and now Defense Minister Li Shangfu hasn’t been seen in public for two weeks. Who’s going to win this unemployment race? China’s youth or Xi’s". The comments conflict with the commonly observed practice of US diplomats staying away from speculation on other countries’ domestic politics. China’s ruling Communist Party also typically issues sharp rebukes of any foreign official’s discussion about the government’s inner workings.

...

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal last week, he said the Communist Party used “lying and cheating as a modus operandi of the state.” He also said the US shouldn’t stand in the way of China’s growing economic peril. “My view is keep doing what you’re doing,” he said. “You’re the one with 30% unemployment among youth, not us. You got 10 years of housing with nobody in it. You got people that are getting fleeced by the big developers and the banks. You got municipalities in China that makes Chicago look like a AAA-rated bond. Keep at it.”

 

Edited by UK
Posted (edited)
Quote

China’s automobile industry, figures Bill Russo, the founder of the consulting firm Automobility in Shanghai, has enough unused factory capacity to make more than 10 million cars (sufficient to supply the entire Japanese car market—twice). Beijing boasts about its extensive network of high-speed railways, already the world’s largest—but the state-owned company that operates it has racked up more than $800 billion in debt and posts substantial losses. The Cato Institute once described China’s rail-building bonanza as a “high-speed debt trap.”

 

Quote

The more power Xi has commanded, the heavier the state’s hand in the economy has become. Xi has relied on state industrial policy to drive innovation, and he has imposed intrusive regulations on important sectors, such as technology and education. As a result, China’s private sector is in retreat. Two years ago, private companies accounted for 55 percent of the collective value of China’s 100 largest publicly traded firms, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics; in mid-2023, that share fell to 39 percent.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/what-china-s-slowdown-really-means-for-the-west/ar-AA1gna6E

Edited by formthirteen
Posted

https://twitter.com/michaelxpettis/status/1700378847512842679

 

Quote

The reason is because since the late 2000s Beijing could only maintain high rates of GDP growth (above, say, 3%) by increasingly shifting the locus of economic activity from the productive "hard-budget constrained" parts of the economy to the less productive...

 

"soft-budget constrained" parts. Because the latter isn't sustainable, and much of it must eventually be reversed anyway, the only way to preserve the GDP growth rates that fueled the "sorpasso" expectations was also what had ultimately to undermine those very expectations.

 

This was always an exercise in how fundamentally we misunderstand what GDP means. Even most economists – who really should know better – seem to think that GDP is a measure, comparable across countries, of the total value of goods and services produced by the economy.

This has been hard to explain to economists, although engineers, mathematicians, other others who think in terms of systems find it almost trivially obvious. Without hard budget constraints, there is no way to differentiate between value creation and value destruction.

 

 

 

Posted
On 9/7/2023 at 11:47 AM, Libs said:

Yuan hits 16- year low. Good luck with that 'world's currency' thing.

 

Name one currency that has not hit a 16 year low in the past 20 years.

Posted

Was reading The Investor Manifesto by Bernstein (published in 2009) and came across this
 

“Similarly, brokerage houses and mutual fund companies often tout the stocks of emerging-market nations, such as Brazil, Russia, India, and China (the so-called BRIC countries) because of their rapid economic growth.

But beware: Share dilution, and often outright theft because of lax security  laws, vaporizes a lot of this growth by the time it reaches the per-share level.

 

For example, China’s economy has been growing at a blistering 9 percent real rate per year for more than two decades. Yet between 1993 and 2008 investors actually lost 3.3 percent per year in Chinese stocks, even with dividends reinvested.

You read that right: Over this 16-year period, even before expenses, the investor in Chinese stocks lost 41.5 percent of value. (The loss of 3.3 percent per year before inflation calculates out to a loss of 5.7 percent per year after inflation.)”

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, juno323 said:


But beware: Share dilution, and often outright theft because of lax security  laws, vaporizes a lot of this growth by the time it reaches the per-share level.

That's why it is important to invest into quality businesses if you invest in China.  

59 minutes ago, juno323 said:

 

For example, China’s economy has been growing at a blistering 9 percent real rate per year for more than two decades. Yet between 1993 and 2008 investors actually lost 3.3 percent per year in Chinese stocks, even with dividends reinvested.

 

Based on which metrics? The Hang Seng is still up 100% in that period even if you take the absolute 2008 rock bottom which isnt a fair comparison anyways. 

59 minutes ago, juno323 said:


You read that right: Over this 16-year period, even before expenses, the investor in Chinese stocks lost 41.5 percent of value. (The loss of 3.3 percent per year before inflation calculates out to a loss of 5.7 percent per year after inflation.)”

Based on which data? 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, UK said:

The Chinese health care system is strange. It's sort of socialized, but you have to bribe doctors and pay extra buy various means to get good treatment (like medicine). there are also a bunch private clinics. I think buying worthless saline solution may just be one way to bribe doctors and if that's the case, there will be other means to facilitate a transactions.

 

I honestly have no idea how it works, but one reason for the high savings rates are health care expenses. People are afraid they are left to die when they get seriously ill without the monetary means to buy or bribe to obtain a decent treatment.

Edited by Spekulatius
Posted

After the foreign minister notes missing, the defense minister Li Shangfu goes missing too:

Then  XJP did not attend the Brics meeting. I am sure all is well in Beijing but probably not everyone is.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

After the foreign minister notes missing, the defense minister Li Shangfu goes missing too:

Then  XJP did not attend the Brics meeting. I am sure all is well in Beijing but probably not everyone is.


if a war starts, within a month those soldiers will turn back to Beijing. Too corrupted, too naive

Posted
38 minutes ago, sleepydragon said:


if a war starts, within a month those soldiers will turn back to Beijing. Too corrupted, too naive

 

I think I remember hearing some say the same thing about Russia, wont fight long, soldiers dying will turn populous against Moscow, army with outdated equipment/tactics, army made up of prisoners and reservists that dont want to fight or know how etc. And here we are. 

 

The soldiers will do what they're told to do, go where they're told to go. 

Posted

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-17/xi-s-security-obsession-turns-ordinary-citizens-into-spy-hunters?srnd=premium-europe

 

“At the time of economic pressure, there are quite obvious concerns at the top leadership,” said Katja Drinhausen, head of the politics and society program at the Mercator Institute for China Studies in Berlin. “Using collective fear as a way to build political and social cohesion is a very dangerous game to play.”

Posted

Micheal Burry posted this article once on his twitter, interesting read: 

 

"An ascendant China seems eerily similar to the Ottomans. Beijing believes that the United States is decadent, undeserving of its affluence, living beyond its means on the fumes of the past - and very soon vulnerable enough to challenge openly.

Left and Right seem to hate each other more than they do their common enemies.

Like the Byzantines, Americans gave up defending their own borders, and simply shrugged as millions overran them as they pleased.

Our once iconic downtowns, like end-stage Constantinople before the fall, are now dirty, half-deserted, dangerous, and dysfunctional.

America prints rather than makes money, as its banks totter near bankruptcy.

Americans similarly believe they are invincible without ensuring in reality that they are. Our military is more worried about being "woke" than deadly."

 

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2023/03/16/are-we-the-byzantines-n2620664

Posted

I think the US is much better positioned than the Byzantines. There is still food & energy security, friendly neighbours and military dominance. But they really need to get their shit together and focus on fixing the real issues instead of fucking around and relying on the country's natural advantages.

Posted (edited)

Chinese blockade of Taiwan would likely fail, Pentagon official says

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinese-blockade-taiwan-likely-fail-164637572.html

 

 

This is in line with my assessment...my thoughts are a decade or two before they are even ready militarily.

 

By all accounts, Xi is not so smart mafioso who has blundered strategically on multiple fronts. He may blunder again and attack prematurely but it would be the end of Xi or CCP or even the world depending on how is unfolds. But knowing he craves stability and control, its unlikely he goes down this path.

 

Xi has pissed off and scared off foreign investors needlessly and iron in the brain means he is too stubborn to reason and listen to sage advice from his smart advisers specially when it comes to things that conflict with his ideology.

 

Some amazing businesses in China are very cheap, but Xi remains the single most important factor in how the China investment story turns out in the short and medium term. Absent health issues, he is not going anywhere and there is no one powerful enough to challenge him.

 

 

 

 

Edited by tnp20

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...