Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

Another thing to consider is that the Trump tax cuts from 2017 are due to expire in 2025.

 

For sure - and one thing I've taught a bit about is that if Biden gets his second term (and its a big if) - he is truly a man that can only be thinking of the next generation given how short the run way that remains for him in life and his political career......I never overestimate the US President's ability to get anything done (the domestic powers of the office are rather weak).....but what I do think the President can do is bring an issue from the back pages to the front pages of political minds and make it an agenda item in Congress.........the US national debt & the annual % deficit is now just irrefutably on a crazy trajectory but it is not yet a political problem that voters think about much so Congress doesn't either.....how ironic would it be if the man that racked up so many trillions of dollars of that debt over his career but directly responsible in the more recent past.....that once he'd been re-elected to the WH & where his political career had no where left to go.....started to speak stridently to the American people on the need for fiscal discipline and getting America's finances 'back on track'.

 

What is clear in my mind - the political expediency of running ~7% budget deficits in a ~3.5% unemployment economy diminishes a whole bunch post Nov 2024 (depending on the outcome)....very interesting to see how it plays out.

 

 

Edited by changegonnacome
Posted

That won’t happen. It’s clear even now during his presidency that biden makes zero actual decisions. He isn’t even allowed to do interviews. He s a figurehead.

Posted

Yeah I hear ya - and listen anytime I suggest a politician might do something hard & selfless, I have to check myself.....my scenario above is kind of an impish outcome.......the most ironic outcome...in a world where Biden gets a second term....it would be hilarious to see him on the pulpit preaching fiscal austerity (after billions were borrowed/committed under his watch and he got re-elected )

Posted
58 minutes ago, Paarslaars said:

 

 

Well if that doesn't signal a top...

Haha incredible, 100% stock will go up on even 10% growth

Posted (edited)

Alright, what’s your feeling on Nvidia earnings?

 

Stock has been trading lower the past couple of days.  
 

After the earnings will it be:

 

- Up big?

 

- Down big?

 

- Little change?

 

I’d be shocked if there was less than 10% move.

 

I’m picking up - 10%+ 

 

 

Edited by Sweet
Posted

Can we get real though? Of all the bears who thought they were witty and funny and clever shorting this the last year, how many had earning inflecting like this? 
 

Answer? None. 
 

If I had to take a directional wager I would have been with them in terms of skepticism, but unlike those dimwits I’ve learned that when stuff seems funky, I can just walk away without doing anything. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Gregmal said:

Can we get real though? Of all the bears who thought they were witty and funny and clever shorting this the last year, how many had earning inflecting like this? 
 

Answer? None. 
 

If I had to take a directional wager I would have been with them in terms of skepticism, but unlike those dimwits I’ve learned that when stuff seems funky, I can just walk away without doing anything. 

Yeah absolutely true, too much arrogance and not seeing the monster growth happening...

Posted

Other thing about Nvidia is the "gold rush" analogy. In the short term it doesn't matter how much gold there actually is in AI. So even if you are sceptical about the practical value of AI, so long as Big Tech, consumers and businesses are fascinated by it and paranoid that if they don't invest in it they will get left behind they will pay whatever it takes to stockpile as many of Nvidia's chips as they can. 

 

Over the medium term it seems quite likely that Nvidia will fall back to earth once they either lose their technological lead or good-enough products at lower prices force them to cut prices and margins and Big Tech have got through the initial investment phase and their annual demand for chip diminishes. But in the short term Nvidia is going to keep going higher until they disappoint investors. 

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, mattee2264 said:

Other thing about Nvidia is the "gold rush" analogy. In the short term it doesn't matter how much gold there actually is in AI. So even if you are sceptical about the practical value of AI, so long as Big Tech, consumers and businesses are fascinated by it and paranoid that if they don't invest in it they will get left behind they will pay whatever it takes to stockpile as many of Nvidia's chips as they can. 

 

Over the medium term it seems quite likely that Nvidia will fall back to earth once they either lose their technological lead or good-enough products at lower prices force them to cut prices and margins and Big Tech have got through the initial investment phase and their annual demand for chip diminishes. But in the short term Nvidia is going to keep going higher until they disappoint investors. 

Yes, the gold rush analogy is a pretty good one. We don’t know how much gold rush is out there, but there is plenty of money sloshing around to buy shovel’s (NVDA chips).

Eventually there will be an AI winter where funding dries up and only the most worthwhile projects and upstarts will receive funding. Thats a while out though.

Edited by Spekulatius
Posted

I think it is getting the point where it no longer matters what the Fed does, or what the economy does, so long as AI beneficiaries continue to beat expectations the market will keep going higher. Especially as at some point AI optimism will be translated into optimism for general economic prospects over the rest of the decade aka Roaring 20s. 

Posted (edited)

I've been thinking about the situation at the FED recently and how it could affect long-term rates in the future. The FED has approximately $4.7 trillion in treasury securities on their balance sheet, and they have sold about $700 billion back into the market over the preceding year. This is evidence that the FED is focused on reducing their balance sheet and should be an indicator for higher long-term rates right? Also how many bonds can the market absorb and to what level?

 

I learned about the economics of it all this morning and came to the conclusion that the effect would be the same whether they sell the bonds or not. This is because the U.S Treasury would have to issue the same debt anyway to pay off the principal of the FED's bonds at maturity, in conclusion causing the same outcome. It's odd though because I've heard the Treasury has been using short-term bills moreso to fund the government, and I wonder if they might ever do the same in that situation, but I don't know if any of that is true.

 

Thoughts?

Edited by blakehampton
Posted

'Generative A.I. has kicked off a new investment cycle to build the next trillion dollars of infrastructure of A.I. Generation factories.' 

 

Nvidia CEO understands what it is all about. Big Tech are gonna invest and so are all the start-ups that will easily be able to attract funding to invest in AI. And even if the resulting product is rubbish after sinking so much money into it they are going to market the hell out of it. And the C-suite and IT department of every company is going to want to invest in AI as well and so it goes. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...