Xerxes Posted May 20, 2025 Posted May 20, 2025 Word on the street is that Larry Culp was trying to lobby Trump during the Middle East travels in order to get his GE engine on the F-35 as second option to P&W’ PW135. Poor Trump misunderstood that as a proposal for a twin-engine F-35, now being dubbed as F-55 being bounced around.
Spekulatius Posted May 20, 2025 Posted May 20, 2025 Well, if you sell engines a two engine plane is better for you than a one engine plane. Worth pitching to Trump . The new big beautiful bill is great for defense stocks. I got to say, the 8% spending cut thy was bounced around earlier by Hegseth scared me a bit +15% sounds much better. I sold my HII on thy China surge (don’t like the business, but the narrative setup was good). I only own RTX (reduce a bit) and Thales (only starter position) and think both are much closer to s sell than an buy here. I have to say, that defense investing seems relatively easy - I bought 8 stocks or so over the last few years and have yet to incur a loser. No doubt a result of the environment since at least 2022 but also because narratives seem to move stocks around much more than they should in this rather resilient business.
dealraker Posted May 20, 2025 Posted May 20, 2025 1 hour ago, Spekulatius said: Well, if you sell engines a two engine plane is better for you than a one engine plane. Worth pitching to Trump . The new big beautiful bill is great for defense stocks. I got to say, the 8% spending cut thy was bounced around earlier by Hegseth scared me a bit +15% sounds much better. I sold my HII on thy China surge (don’t like the business, but the narrative setup was good). I only own RTX (reduce a bit) and Thales (only starter position) and think both are much closer to s sell than an buy here. I have to say, that defense investing seems relatively easy - I bought 8 stocks or so over the last few years and have yet to incur a loser. No doubt a result of the environment since at least 2022 but also because narratives seem to move stocks around much more than they should in this rather resilient business. I very much appreciate your defence related posts Ralf. I have all the major names for decades in my taxable accounts, sold in ira all and only bought back LHX after the election sell. The narratives and those voices as expected seem to be losing interest, self enrichment looks to be more their focus...again as expected.
Spekulatius Posted May 24, 2025 Posted May 24, 2025 Looks like @lnofeisone was correct about $BAH. Big forecast miss and layoffs: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/booz-allen-hamilton-holding-corporation-014216310.html
Dalal.Holdings Posted May 24, 2025 Posted May 24, 2025 Anyone got any interesting Japanese defense co's/suppliers ?
Spekulatius Posted May 24, 2025 Posted May 24, 2025 5 minutes ago, Dalal.Holdings said: Anyone got any interesting Japanese defense co's/suppliers ? There isn’t much available as they are mostly hidden within the keiretsus.
Dalal.Holdings Posted May 25, 2025 Posted May 25, 2025 Even Subaru makes some military helicopters -- Subaru !
Xerxes Posted May 25, 2025 Posted May 25, 2025 5 hours ago, Dalal.Holdings said: Anyone got any interesting Japanese defense co's/suppliers ? Mitsubishi and Kawasaki Heavies have been rallying hard though
Dalal.Holdings Posted May 25, 2025 Posted May 25, 2025 I think the German and Japanese defense ecosystems are set to undergo rapid change as the Post-WW2 framework ends
lnofeisone Posted May 26, 2025 Posted May 26, 2025 On 5/24/2025 at 10:00 AM, Spekulatius said: Looks like @lnofeisone was correct about $BAH. Big forecast miss and layoffs: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/booz-allen-hamilton-holding-corporation-014216310.html Thanks @Spekulatius. BAH is taking a beating in their Civilian and Health work. Their DOD work is holding up well and slowly growing. This is the same reason why the likes of CACI rebounded (though I think CACI will have different problems in 6-12 months). Depending on where the current administration decides to settle on things, BAH might be a good pick-up come mid-term elections.
anshulp Posted May 28, 2025 Posted May 28, 2025 $7721 and $7013 are neat. I think $4403 makes parts for rockets & missiles. On 5/24/2025 at 11:48 AM, Dalal.Holdings said: Anyone got any interesting Japanese defense co's/suppliers ?
Hektor Posted May 30, 2025 Posted May 30, 2025 https://www.wsj.com/world/america-let-its-military-industrial-might-wither-chinas-is-booming-7325f34b America Let Its Military-Industrial Might Wither. China’s Is Booming.
Hektor Posted May 30, 2025 Posted May 30, 2025 Also, China. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/business/china-comac-c919-trump.html Trump Has Targeted a Plane China Sees as a ‘Power’ Symbol Beijing has high hopes for its C919 single-aisle jet after years of delay, but the plane depends on engines, avionics and other gear from Western companies. In 2008, China established the state-owned Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, or COMAC, with the goal of putting a single-aisle commercial jet into service by 2016. Development of the plane has been slow. The company, which occupies a large expanse of newly built hangars and design studios in Shanghai, suffered delays despite extensive assistance from American and European companies. At least 40 percent of the C919 is made by companies in the United States and other countries in the West.
Hektor Posted June 1, 2025 Posted June 1, 2025 https://www.wsj.com/business/trump-federal-contracts-tech-firms-c839fdbb Trump Administration Targets Tech Firms as It Cuts More Contracts Officials expand review of federal contractors beyond consulting firms
Spekulatius Posted June 2, 2025 Posted June 2, 2025 21 minutes ago, Dalal.Holdings said: This low tech attack works because Russia does not even have a rudimentary air defense system in place to defend their bases. Something like this: https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/products/air-defence/air-defence-systems/drone-defence-toolbox
Dalal.Holdings Posted June 2, 2025 Posted June 2, 2025 3 hours ago, Spekulatius said: This low tech attack works because Russia does not even have a rudimentary air defense system in place to defend their bases. Something like this: https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/products/air-defence/air-defence-systems/drone-defence-toolbox What do you mean though? Russia has installed advanced Tire Anti-Drone System on its planes (albeit the # of tires has come down over the years):
lnofeisone Posted June 2, 2025 Posted June 2, 2025 6 hours ago, Dalal.Holdings said: What do you mean though? Russia has installed advanced Tire Anti-Drone System on its planes (albeit the # of tires has come down over the years): Tires on the planes is an anti-missile tactic. It's very effective against missiles that rely on pattern matching. Never mind the cost/return of throwing a bunch of used tires on a plane. Drones are a different facet of an attack.
Dalal.Holdings Posted June 2, 2025 Posted June 2, 2025 1 hour ago, lnofeisone said: Tires on the planes is an anti-missile tactic. It's very effective against missiles that rely on pattern matching. Never mind the cost/return of throwing a bunch of used tires on a plane. Drones are a different facet of an attack. Not necessarily. The tires confuse machine vision/AI that is looking for "airplane" which can be used for drone targeting, especially in the final few meters https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/year_later_pentagon_explains_whats_the_point_of_aircraft_drawings_and_tire_coatings_at_russian_military_airfields-11877.html It's still ridiculous and hilarious though
lnofeisone Posted June 2, 2025 Posted June 2, 2025 14 minutes ago, Dalal.Holdings said: Not necessarily. The tires confuse machine vision/AI that is looking for "airplane" which can be used for drone targeting, especially in the final few meters https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/year_later_pentagon_explains_whats_the_point_of_aircraft_drawings_and_tire_coatings_at_russian_military_airfields-11877.html It's still ridiculous and hilarious though I'm not really sure what you are arguing. I said that tires are there for missile protection. Your article says exactly the same thing.
Dalal.Holdings Posted June 3, 2025 Posted June 3, 2025 On 6/2/2025 at 7:27 AM, Spekulatius said: This low tech attack works because Russia does not even have a rudimentary air defense system in place to defend their bases. Something like this: https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/products/air-defence/air-defence-systems/drone-defence-toolbox It seems like false sense of confidence to think these anti-drone things can work all that well as they haven't really been battle tested. I imagine that much of what's being marketed as anti-drone defense wouldn't be able to stand up to swarms of drones and be easily overwhelmed.
LC Posted June 3, 2025 Posted June 3, 2025 1 minute ago, Dalal.Holdings said: I imagine that much of what's being marketed as anti-drone defense wouldn't be able to stand up to swarms of drones and be easily overwhelmed. Someone tell Taco we need SkyNet. No, not from Terminator....but a gigantic fishing net in the sky
Dalal.Holdings Posted June 3, 2025 Posted June 3, 2025 (edited) On 6/2/2025 at 6:40 PM, lnofeisone said: I'm not really sure what you are arguing. I said that tires are there for missile protection. Your article says exactly the same thing. https://www.twz.com/air/russia-covering-its-aircraft-in-tires-is-about-befuddling-image-matching-seekers-u-s-military-confirms Quote Russia's efforts to befuddle cruise missiles and drones with imaging-matching seeker capabilities Quote In a statement, the SBU revealed that the operation relied on domestically developed unmanned systems enhanced by artificial intelligence, trained to autonomously identify airfields and pinpoint vulnerabilities on the aircraft without human input. https://defence-blog.com/ukraine-uses-ai-drones-to-target-russian-bombers/ The point being that it's not just missiles, but drones that they are trying to confuse with the tires. Edited June 3, 2025 by Dalal.Holdings
Spekulatius Posted June 5, 2025 Posted June 5, 2025 On 5/26/2025 at 12:26 AM, lnofeisone said: Thanks @Spekulatius. BAH is taking a beating in their Civilian and Health work. Their DOD work is holding up well and slowly growing. This is the same reason why the likes of CACI rebounded (though I think CACI will have different problems in 6-12 months). Depending on where the current administration decides to settle on things, BAH might be a good pick-up come mid-term elections. BAH is starting to look interesting now. Perhaps we get another leg down but they have over time shown strong ability to grow and defend their margins. A few more confirming datapoints (insider buys, revenue confirmation) would be nice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now