Elon Musk...human? - Political

[Sweet]

43 minutes ago, flesh said:

I’ll try to translate trumpese for you. He knows that the total fentanyl crossings from Canada are minor. He wants them reduced. The primary reason he says this is so that he has a stronger reason to impose tariffs that will hold up and he believes that something about trade relations are unfair… smokescreens.  It could be subsidies to certain industries, existing tariffs, tariff like instruments that have the same or similar effect, restrictions, or any other form of distorting effect. Of course free trade with friendlies and maximizing comparative advantage is the ideal, the ideal is never what happens. 
 

I posted in another thread with no response but I’ve yet to see a thorough analysis of all distorting effects on trade between usa and Canada. I personally done know if it’s fair or close to it. If it is I’ll agree it is if it’s wholistic.  
 

Regarding whether or not trumps strategies are, if I’m right, lying. I suppose you could say he’s lying partially.. in the sense that he uses one small reason as the main reason for what he’s doing. Otoh if he’s right and trade is unfair and In order to straighten it out he can’t see another path forward…. That’s a more difficult question. I don’t see how anybody can confidently say anything wo considering what I’ve written here. I originally come back to cobf recently thinking the Canadians … or somebody.. being the smart analytical types that invest.. would have a competent analysis of the trade between the two countries and found the opposite. I haven’t had time to do it my self but I’ll try. Also, if the usa is going to produce some things here for strategic reasons, antifragilityreasons, then that means by definition we will be buying less of those things Elsewhere and that means elsewhere wont be happy about selling less stuff to us. If we can’t compete for ammo prices and we need to manufacture our own, we may need tariffs. 
 

Also don’t assume those of us who voted for him are cultists, you won’t learn anything that way. In 2016 my father voted for him, and hated doing so, being a lifelong Mormon, the cleanest sort, only because he knew the Supreme Court appointees were coming up. He has no idea what happening in general. 
 

for myself, doge and cutting the deficit to 3% of gdp was paramount and the rest noise and I saw the opposite inclination since forever on the other side. For me, if this happens and wars don’t get worse, I’m willing to deal with the fallout as I see it as existential. I voted for Obama Romney Hillary then trump trump. Other things matter but I rank order them low compared to a snowballing debt/interest rate/inflation problem. 
 

For me the biggest mistake of the last four years was allowing the economy to be shuttered excessively and raining money in massive excess. Biggest mistake I’m aware of in my lifetime. I said that here March 2020 more or less. Then Biden doubled  down when the coast was clear. Destroyed the lives of tens of Millions of non asset owners for 79 year olds with 2.5 co morbidities who were going to die shortly and whom we could have targeted for relief at 1/100th the cost. 
 

 

 

I think overall that is how trump works.

 

However, ‘Who would ever sign a thing like this?’ - Trump said that a couple of weeks when referring to US trade deals.

 

Trump negotiated and signed this trade deal with Canada and Mexico.  So if the USMCA deal sucks then he’s probably to blame.

 

Edited Wednesday at 09:28 PM by Sweet

[Spekulatius]

3 hours ago, cubsfan said:

 

Trudeau is your idiot not ours. 

 

Why are you allowing him to negotiate on behalf of the Canadian people?

Trudeau is actually doing better in the polls now. Nothing better for popularity of a politician than dealing with an external threat.

[dealraker]

19 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

Trudeau is actually doing better in the polls now. Nothing better for popularity of a politician than dealing with an external threat.

And Tesla has morphed to Bud Light?   LOL, I was actively buying the BUD in the lower 50's but you can be triple damn sure I will never discuss it on this site except to mention it here.  

[lnofeisone]

17 hours ago, Gregmal said:

LOL this is a great post with a lot of thought and consideration, and like always, its probably either ignored or met with the TDS drenched 3-4 sentence rager...

While I find @flesh's prose a bit logorrheic, I don't think anyone would disagree with having an efficient government that minimizes or eliminates fraud, waste, and abuse and maintains a healthy budget.

 

The crux of the argument here is the HOW. How are Elon and DT going about fixing the gov't. There are laws and processes and they disregard both. So far the savings amounted to fractions of what they claim and their actions are being reversed (https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-civil-service-board-reinstates-thousands-fired-usda-employees-2025-03-05/) which basically amounts to added cost (workers were out 2 weeks doing 0 work, they will get backpay, and now they have to get reprocessed back in, which is extra work). 

 

Add in republicans threatening to impeach judges they don't like and the DOJ, on behalf of OPM, straight up lying to the court (and the DOJ got rightfully called out by the union and scolded by the judge); there is a lot not to like about the approach of the current administration. Given that Musk is running DOGE with the blessing of DT, this is 100% on him. 

[rogermunibond]

 

[rogermunibond]

[Spekulatius]

Elon is pretty full of himself. He is also wrong about no alternatives to Starlink. Eutelsat is one and it is being used in Ukraine.The 50M in cost matches my estimate for the 40k terminals that Ukraine is operating. Those are fully paid for, so he is lying too in addition to being arrogant.

 

 

[John Hjorth]

2 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

Elon is pretty full of himself. He is also wrong about no alternatives to Starlink. Eutelsat is one and it is being used in Ukraine.The 50M in cost matches my estimate for the 40k terminals that Ukraine is operating. Those are fully paid for, so he is lying too in addition to being arrogant.

 

 

 

Thank you for sharing, @Spekulatius,

 

Absolutely shocking.

 

One do not - never - insult customers.

 

And if I was a SpaceX investor, I would have been all over Mr. Musk by now.

 

Absolutely fantastic entrepreneur, awesome at getting things to happen, and yet again, deep down, he is just a street boy, with very bad manners, a very bad example of the new generation of the newly and filthy rich.

[Eng12345]

Elon Musk seeks Italian presidential meeting to salvage Starlink deal

 

Dance buddy dance

Edited 1 hour ago by Eng12345

[John Hjorth]

41 minutes ago, Eng12345 said:

Elon Musk seeks Italian presidential meeting to salvage Starlink deal

 

Dance buddy dance

 

Thank you for sharing, @Eng12345,

 

About ~1½ years ago, I was seriously considering a Starlink connection :

 

I finally decided to go with a 1,000 Mbit fibre connection in the home in stead of a Starlink installation, migrating from a lame 20 Mbit down / 2 Mbit up copper connection, installed around beginning af February last year. I had to pay quite some extra to get the installation inside the house the way I wanted it. Now easy to build the installation out with ouside mesh nodes on both sides of the house if this is needed.[Patio on the backside of the house [afternoon and evening spot) and a small place with a table and chairs on the front side of the house [morning spot, to get the sunrise)][I did not really get the chance last year to check if it works as is, because of my health situation then].

 

If I had opted for a Starlink connection I would have dumped it now, as early as practically possible.

Edited 39 minutes ago by John Hjorth

[Eng12345]

It's a decent product for its use case - certainly better than Viasat or Hughesnet. 

 

My company uses it for internet at remote locations. I've noticed that it seems to instantaneously lose connection regularly when switching satellites. This isn't noticeable in normal browsing, but in using things that require continuous internet connection it is problematic. For instance, SAP is rendered completely useless as the secure connection is not maintained - every time it hops satellites I have to re login. 

 

I'm sure there's a workaround for an IT head - but getting that troubleshot in a multinational corporation when dealing with security licensures etc is next to impossible.