UK Posted September 6 Posted September 6 30 minutes ago, gfp said: I have no idea, but he will certainly gain more privacy once he crosses below 10%. I don't expect him to stop before then. With BAC repurchases expected in the future, he would want to at least get a fair bit under 10% before stopping or the reporting issue would just creep up again. My guess is that if BAC's market price stays up here around $40 he will keep selling. He may stop if the share price falls. I would not be surprised to see him sell the entire position but we will only find out on 13fs and maybe the 10q. Thanks!
John Hjorth Posted September 6 Posted September 6 13 minutes ago, Xerxes said: instead of blowing a fuse, he could easily sent his comments to The Economist. Where it might even get printed. Despite that, an unsuspecting reader of the formerly great Economist might conclude that the index is a better investment than BR @Xerxes, Yes, that's actually valid points. If his points were formulated and phrased in a more polite and balanced way, his response might have had a chance for getting printed. And with regard to your quote above from the tweet post [<- Google is my friend] on X, there is just to say that bying the index compared to buying Berkshire are two totally different investments, plain and simple, which is also the very reason and cause for the eternal onging discussion of it, ref. Mr. Bloomstrans use of 'better'. Its all about subjective [personal] perceived judgements about expected returns and assumed risks forward looking. I personally think his points are correct, ref. his great and voluminous work publised during the years [, which I actually really appreciate, and I am thankful for free access to it], but the form in this situation reminds me of that of a very protective terrier.
Xerxes Posted September 6 Posted September 6 John I don’t have a problem with his content. I am grateful for anything that he writes. The issue is X/Twitter that promote “cult” behaviour. Bloomstran is just the latest Twitter user behaving as a head of a cult.
dealraker Posted September 6 Posted September 6 12 minutes ago, Xerxes said: John I don’t have a problem with his content. I am grateful for anything that he writes. The issue is X/Twitter that promote “cult” behaviour. Bloomstran is just the latest Twitter user behaving as a head of a cult. I think it is accurate that some investors feel protected by the likes of Bloomstran (who replaced Tilson). There are others and their message is pure homespun - playing to the childlike hopefulness and safety seeking of human nature. An example is his milking of a pretended Berkshire connection - the best selling vehicle of his selling model. Like so many successful asset gatherings of the past - the 50 page Berkshire analysis is cream of the crop to lace up those shoes. With a 5th graders logic and brain development it is beyond easy to know when to buy the stock of Berkshire. But if you make the analysis of Berk a 1000 page book? It sells you as lord protector. Of recent it was none other than Bloomstran - actually Semper - who co-led a mass of frantic obsession/buying with DG that's turned bad, really bad. My guess though is that Bloomstran had absolutely nothing to do with it all. He's too busy out-and-about selling. It's working, assets under management growing nicely. Won't last. Over time Semper will intermittently give you pre-fee performance figures if you consider that relevant.
Xerxes Posted September 6 Posted September 6 7 minutes ago, dealraker said: I think it is accurate that some investors feel protected by the likes of Bloomstran (who replaced Tilson). There are others and their message is pure homespun - playing to the childlike hopefulness and safety seeking of human nature. An example is his milking of a pretended Berkshire connection - the best selling vehicle of his selling model. Like so many successful asset gatherings of the past - the 50 page Berkshire analysis is cream of the crop to lace up those shoes. With a 5th graders logic and brain development it is beyond easy to know when to buy the stock of Berkshire. But if you make the analysis of Berk a 1000 page book? It sells you as lord protector. Of recent it was none other than Bloomstran - actually Semper - who co-led a mass of frantic obsession/buying with DG that's turned bad, really bad. My guess though is that Bloomstran had absolutely nothing to do with it all. He's too busy out-and-about selling. It's working, assets under management growing nicely. Won't last. Over time Semper will intermittently give you pre-fee performance figures if you consider that relevant. “An example is his milking of a pretended Berkshire connection - the best selling vehicle of his selling model.” love this !
John Hjorth Posted September 6 Posted September 6 (edited) 3 hours ago, dealraker said: ... Over time Semper will intermittently give you pre-fee performance figures if you consider that relevant. ... Charlie [ @dealraker ], Detailed information about fees are actually for everyone to study on the last page of the latest Client Letter. There appear to be after fee-performance available. The funny thing about it is I get so much data thrown my way from the page, that I'm not even sure I understand it correctly. To me, it looks like a CAGR 1 percent fee drag included in net performance compared to gross, however I'm not sure of it. Berkshire cost of delegation of capital allocation [including access to non-listed investments, you can't buy your self in the market] : Holdco costs 2023 : USD 244 M. Average equity 2023 : USD [[473,424 M + USD 561,273]/2] = USD 517,349 M, meaning, thus : HoldCo costs at : 244 / 517,349 ~ 0,05 %. Why on earth are people representing and owning Berkshire shares for a market value at EOP 2024H1 of USD 175 M [174,809,000, to be exact] [Semper Augustus's position [A + B] , as per Dataroma] paying USD 1.75 M [1 %] in fees [in aggregate] in stead of buying and holding the damn thing themselves? Edited September 6 by John Hjorth Spelling
ValueMaven Posted September 6 Posted September 6 People who say that Berkshire would acquire Markel for Gayner's insurance knowledge really dont know Berkshire at all! Berkshire has the deepest senior talent in the P&C industry period. This was only enhanced by the addition of Joe Brandon of Alleghany less than 12 months ago! What would be really cool is if Weston Hicks joined the company, or even the board!
gfp Posted September 6 Posted September 6 10 minutes ago, ValueMaven said: People who say that Berkshire would acquire Markel for Gayner's insurance knowledge really dont know Berkshire at all! Berkshire has the deepest senior talent in the P&C industry period. This was only enhanced by the addition of Joe Brandon of Alleghany less than 12 months ago! What would be really cool is if Weston Hicks joined the company, or even the board! My impression was that Gayner wasn't even the "insurance guy" - he was the investment guy who eventually ascended to CEO. Either way, people are interpreting Gayner's "cryptic comment" in strange ways. What Berkshire deals have been leaked and hinted about publicly way in advance? Why would Berkshire sell MKL shares if it was interesting in acquiring the entire company? Why would MKL sell the entire company to Berkshire? How on earth would Tom Gayner be in the loop on hypothetical confidential negotiations between Chubb and Berkshire? Why would Chubb sell to Berkshire? "there are things going on that I'm not at liberty to discuss" sounds to me like MKL was never a Buffett position (no surprise, it's too small for him to mess with) and Todd or whoever gave Gayner an excuse. Maybe something like, "I'm not managing this certain pool of money any more because I have to focus on GEICO so we are liquidating my positions in this portfolio." Probably wrong but a lot more plausible than the above.
Charlie Posted September 7 Posted September 7 On 9/6/2024 at 3:02 PM, gfp said: My impression was that Gayner wasn't even the "insurance guy" - he was the investment guy who eventually ascended to CEO. Either way, people are interpreting Gayner's "cryptic comment" in strange ways. What Berkshire deals have been leaked and hinted about publicly way in advance? Why would Berkshire sell MKL shares if it was interesting in acquiring the entire company? Why would MKL sell the entire company to Berkshire? How on earth would Tom Gayner be in the loop on hypothetical confidential negotiations between Chubb and Berkshire? Why would Chubb sell to Berkshire? "there are things going on that I'm not at liberty to discuss" sounds to me like MKL was never a Buffett position (no surprise, it's too small for him to mess with) and Todd or whoever gave Gayner an excuse. Maybe something like, "I'm not managing this certain pool of money any more because I have to focus on GEICO so we are liquidating my positions in this portfolio." Probably wrong but a lot more plausible than the above. Yeah, it was wishful thinking, but it was a lot of fun.
backtothebeach Posted September 10 Posted September 10 (edited) I would love for Buffett to find a way to use the cash to shrink the company by, say, 250 billion in a tax efficient way for shareholders. Maybe acquire something and then spin it out. Then shareholders can choose to hold the spinout or sell it, depending on their tax situation. A Berkshire with 750 billion market cap should be easier to grow for Greg than a 1 trillion market cap, at least for a while. Probably not gonna happen, doing a spin would be a bad precedent before handing over the reigns. But shrinking the company a bit would be nice. Edited September 10 by backtothebeach
bizaro86 Posted September 10 Posted September 10 3 hours ago, backtothebeach said: I would love for Buffett to find a way to use the cash to shrink the company by, say, 250 billion in a tax efficient way for shareholders. Maybe acquire something and then spin it out. Then shareholders can choose to hold the spinout or sell it, depending on their tax situation. A Berkshire with 750 billion market cap should be easier to grow for Greg than a 1 trillion market cap, at least for a while. Probably not gonna happen, doing a spin would be a bad precedent before handing over the reigns. But shrinking the company a bit would be nice. I think you'd be more likely to see a big buyback than a spin. The next time there's a big market crash maybe just buy $100B of BRK...
DooDiligence Posted September 10 Posted September 10 54 minutes ago, bizaro86 said: I think you'd be more likely to see a big buyback than a spin. The next time there's a big market crash maybe just buy $100B of BRK... So many options. All of them stand a chance of being good.
Jaygo Posted September 10 Posted September 10 7 hours ago, backtothebeach said: I would love for Buffett to find a way to use the cash to shrink the company by, say, 250 billion in a tax efficient way for shareholders. Maybe acquire something and then spin it out. Then shareholders can choose to hold the spinout or sell it, depending on their tax situation. A Berkshire with 750 billion market cap should be easier to grow for Greg than a 1 trillion market cap, at least for a while. Probably not gonna happen, doing a spin would be a bad precedent before handing over the reigns. But shrinking the company a bit would be nice. This is my hope too. A buyback would be great but unlikely unless shit gets crazy. Is a return of capital a tax advantaged possibility?
Jaygo Posted September 10 Posted September 10 He could also just buys some awesome businesses outright but at some point too big is too big. I would not have been upset with 3M at the lows or Graco anytime. Why not buy out Suncor or TransForce up north? Lots of ideas but WB is the be all and end all so he will decide. Maybe he will buy out Cargill or Mars and we can all stop worrying about cash for a long time.
wescobrk Posted September 11 Posted September 11 I don’t understand this comment from Moynihan, he and Buffett have spoke on the phone before, Moynihan can’t call him? Why can’t Moynihan call him now but in the past he could? BofA CEO Brian Moynihan made a rare comment about Berkshire’s sales Tuesday, saying he has no knowledge of Buffett’s motivation for selling. “I don’t know what exactly he’s doing, because frankly, we can’t ask him. We wouldn’t ask,” he said during Barclays Global Financial Services Conference, according to a transcript on FactSet. “But on the other hand, the market’s absorbing the stock .... we’re buying a portion of the stock, and so life will go on.”
alpha Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Jain sold half his Berkshire holdings as the stock price peaked https://www.barrons.com/articles/berkshire-hathway-stock-sell-jain-buffett-7421346b?mod=hp_LATEST
Munger_Disciple Posted September 12 Posted September 12 25 minutes ago, alpha said: Jain sold half his Berkshire holdings as the stock price peaked https://www.barrons.com/articles/berkshire-hathway-stock-sell-jain-buffett-7421346b?mod=hp_LATEST Wow! Didn't see that coming.
UK Posted September 12 Posted September 12 (edited) 10 hours ago, alpha said: Jain sold half his Berkshire holdings as the stock price peaked https://www.barrons.com/articles/berkshire-hathway-stock-sell-jain-buffett-7421346b?mod=hp_LATEST Wow! Did not see this coming either. But this is exactly what I also did YTD, though perhaps on average Ajit did get a better price. I like seeing someone from BRK being somewhat more enterprising and active with the managing of his capital:)) Edited September 12 by UK
Luke Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Haha! Probably the right move here! But surprising to see such a large sale from high up in the management.
Hektor Posted September 12 Posted September 12 (edited) Here is the Form-4 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000172845124000004/xslF345X05/primary_doc.xml Planning to retire?? Edited September 12 by Hektor
Munger_Disciple Posted September 12 Posted September 12 (edited) Based on my math, Ajit sold 200 A shares out of his total holdings of 449 equivalent A shares prior to the sale. So the press is wrong. Ajit sold 44.5% of his Berkshire stock and retains 55.5%. Still a significant sale though. Even after this sale, Ajit owns more Berkshire stock (249 A share equivalents) than Greg (229 A share equivalents). Edited September 12 by Munger_Disciple
sleepydragon Posted September 12 Posted September 12 It’s almost exactly $100m after tax. Is there a possiblity that Ajain is buying a huge house? The most expensive house in CT is around $50m, but there are a lot of big houses in Florida
73 Reds Posted September 12 Posted September 12 5 minutes ago, sleepydragon said: It’s almost exactly $100m after tax. Is there a possiblity that Ajain is buying a huge house? The most expensive house in CT is around $50m, but there are a lot of big houses in Florida LOL, one would think he'd have no trouble qualifying for a mortgage. Or Berkshire would lend him the money. Do we know what else he owns besides BRK shares? My guess this is part of an estate plan.
adesigar Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Probably making a $100 million donation to a charity that he supports.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now