Jump to content

If American - which presidential candidate will you vote for?


LongHaul
[[Template core/global/global/poll is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Recommended Posts

Nice one

Hillary is one of the best candidates America has ever had. Sad most Americans can't realize this. She has done and said many things that I disagree with, but this is about as rational, informed and intelligent a candidate as you can expect. The relentless attacks from the right (for decades now) have turned a flawed person (and every one of you is flawed, and is guilty of lying from time to time to come of as better than you actually are) into a monster. Hillary has told her share of lies, but every other sentence out of Trump's mouth is a lie, misrepresentation or a self-serving boast, but his supporter base is full of morons who can't seem to realize this or don't seem to care. It's the Dunning-Kruger effect in its full, depressing glory. If Hillary told half the bullshit that comes out of Trump's mouth on a daily basis, she would not be a serious candidate, and I think that tells you a lot about the voter base of each candidate.

 

Amazing that some people here are even taking Trump seriously. This isn't even a political thing, where I'm just trying to bash the Republican guy (I think much of the republican party is repulsive, dangerous and backwards but I wouldn't criticize say...Romney, if he were the candidate), but it's on the basis of the fact that Trump is a moron, and the worst kind of a moron, the kind of pompous moron who walks into every room thinking he is actually the smartest person. This guy sounds uninformed on just about every issue he touches. We have people here who seem to associate richness with goodness and competence, so I guess there's some truth to the saying "a rich man's folly passes for good judgement". How much money he has, how many times he went bankrupt, why he is hiding his tax returns, this is all irrelevant, just pay attention to what he is actually saying and realize that he knows nothing and is proposing one reckless thing after another, and that's the scary thing about him.

 

Nice once, Swimming.  You say everything that I was thinking, but couldn't think of a way to write concisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 747
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hillary is one of the best candidates America has ever had. Sad most Americans can't realize this. She has done and said many things that I disagree with, but this is about as rational, informed and intelligent a candidate as you can expect. The relentless attacks from the right (for decades now) have turned a flawed person (and every one of you is flawed, and is guilty of lying from time to time to come of as better than you actually are) into a monster. Hillary has told her share of lies, but every other sentence out of Trump's mouth is a lie, misrepresentation or a self-serving boast, but his supporter base is full of morons who can't seem to realize this or don't seem to care. It's the Dunning-Kruger effect in its full, depressing glory. If Hillary told half the bullshit that comes out of Trump's mouth on a daily basis, she would not be a serious candidate, and I think that tells you a lot about the voter base of each candidate.

 

Amazing that some people here are even taking Trump seriously. This isn't even a political thing, where I'm just trying to bash the Republican guy (I think much of the republican party is repulsive, dangerous and backwards but I wouldn't criticize say...Romney, if he were the candidate), but it's on the basis of the fact that Trump is a moron, and the worst kind of a moron, the kind of pompous moron who walks into every room thinking he is actually the smartest person. This guy sounds uninformed on just about every issue he touches. We have people here who seem to associate richness with goodness and competence, so I guess there's some truth to the saying "a rich man's folly passes for good judgement". How much money he has, how many times he went bankrupt, why he is hiding his tax returns, this is all irrelevant, just pay attention to what he is actually saying and realize that he knows nothing and is proposing one reckless thing after another, and that's the scary thing about him.

 

+1 on this. It is impossible for a politician, ESPECIALLY one who has been in office as long as her, to not be dishonest or disingenuous to some degree. This is the nature of politics. For all the talk about Sanders and his integrity during this election season, he has also stretched the truth and pandered to public prejudices.

 

Hillary has proven herself to be a very rational thinker and a fighter and she has plenty of experience. Various groups in the Right have pummeled her for decades to the point that the perception of her has deviated massively from the reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is about as rational, informed and intelligent a candidate as you can expect

 

This is both immensely sad and yet undoubtedly true, and tells you everything you need to know about the system.

 

+1

 

I would agree that Hillary is the most "qualified" for the job of the current major-party candidates BUT it's seems increasingly likely that she's been involved ion criminal activities and it is clear from the e-mail releases that she thinks she's above rules (which is the last thing I want from the executive branch which has already usurped much of the oversight from the other branches). 

 

Further, she has no integrity - she has flip flopped on just about every major issues she has ever voiced an opinion on which points to a lack of any principles and a willingness to pander in return for votes to satiate her lust for power. Lastly, she's been in support of some of the worst policy decisions made by the U.S. government in the last two decades with the most obvious being the Iraqi war.

 

So yes, she's the most "qualified" from an experience perspective, but no, I do not think that a criminal with an enormous capacity to lie, who stands for nothing and no one except what benefits herself, is the type of person I want to give  a large amount of nearly unchecked power too.

 

That's not to say I think Trump is any better. It's sad that this is the choice that is given to Americans and that they demand no alternative because that would be "wasting your vote".

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post TwoCitiesCapital.

 

It is funny, I have heard no one saying that Trump is great, perfect and all that on this thread but, we have some individuals praising Hillary Clinton as some kind of god.

 

In terms of ego and arrogance they are neck and neck. I don't think that I would have any fun with either of them discussing over a beer or going for a game of golf or some other activity.

 

Both are total a-holes. However, a choice has to be made and it is right or left. And since Hillary keeps deviating to the extreme left to garner Democrat votes, we have no clue as to what she truly stands for. In other words, rest assured that she won't be a center-left president if Democrats retake the House and Senate in two years.

 

Cardboard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post TwoCitiesCapital.

 

It is funny, I have heard no one saying that Trump is great, perfect and all that on this thread but, we have some individuals praising Hillary Clinton as some kind of god.

 

In terms of ego and arrogance they are neck and neck. I don't think that I would have any fun with either of them discussing over a beer or going for a game of golf or some other activity.

 

Both are total a-holes. However, a choice has to be made and it is right or left. And since Hillary keeps deviating to the extreme left to garner Democrat votes, we have no clue as to what she truly stands for. In other words, rest assured that she won't be a center-left president if Democrats retake the House and Senate in two years.

 

Cardboard

 

Hillary is rational and this significant leftist movement in her party (or perhaps more accurately, the country in general) has basically left her no choice but to give credence to those voices. At heart, however, she is a centrist.

 

Obama was thought to be the same prior to him becoming president, but I do not see this drastic shift to a socialist economy that so many on the right have decried. Socialism is really anathema to American culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post TwoCitiesCapital.

In terms of ego and arrogance they are neck and neck. I don't think that I would have any fun with either of them discussing over a beer or going for a game of golf or some other activity.

 

No I would have no desire to meet either of them either.  John Stossel tried having lunch with Hillary, it went about as well as you would expect.

 

""I know who you are!" she interrupted. We were off. I give her credit: She argued with me for half an hour. Finally, she'd had enough. She just ignored me for the rest of the meal."

 

John Stossel: Hillary Clinton and I had lunch. Here's what happened

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't even a political thing, where I'm just trying to bash the Republican guy (I think much of the republican party is repulsive, dangerous and backwards but I wouldn't criticize say...Romney, if he were the candidate)

 

So a leftist could stand the most centrist Republicans. I mean come on, where is the big insight in this? Why do leftist people always try and paint their opinions as some kind of objective truth about the world? You spell out your bias and then go directly to claiming universal truths.

 

And making broad, sweeping conclusions about the intelligence of each candidates' voter base, lol. There is maximum a couple of IQ points difference between the average of the two and it most probably will be just about a wash. That's how big numbers work. The only candidate who could claim a genuinely smarter voter base is Gary Johnson and that's precisely because he doesn't have any mass appeal whatsoever. You could never get a niche candidate who only got the dumb vote, for natural reasons.

 

The fact that you actually seriously think that the average Hillary supporter is way smarter than the average Trump supporter speaks loads about either your personal bias or the bias of the media you consume. Or both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish there was a candidate who had Trump's foreign policy and Clinton's domestic/trade policies. It's amazing how Trump can be so rational with his fp - don't needlessly bomb other nations, be open to talking with other world leaders, even if they may not be our friends. Too bad he's a divisive demagogue here at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you like personal freedoms? Do you like personal choice? Fiscally conservative but socially liberal? I'm telling you all, Gary Johnson should be Commander in Chief!

 

Haha, I like all personal freedoms except the right to bear arms. He's more pro 2nd amendment than Trump unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you like personal freedoms? Do you like personal choice? Fiscally conservative but socially liberal? I'm telling you all, Gary Johnson should be Commander in Chief!

 

Won't happen - I'm optimistic that he'll get 10-15% of the vote so Libertarians become a swing factor in future elections, but he'll never get enough support to become president. Even among his supporters are those who will vote right/left because they don't want to "waste" a vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish there was a candidate who had Trump's foreign policy and Clinton's domestic/trade policies. It's amazing how Trump can be so rational with his fp - don't needlessly bomb other nations, be open to talking with other world leaders, even if they may not be our friends. Too bad he's a divisive demagogue here at home.

 

As far as foreign policy goes, Rand Paul was saying something similar, before he got swallowed by the Tsunami.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Trump's tweet this morning is unreal.

 

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/749235486389043200

 

Text:

 

"Crooked Hillary - - Makes History!"

 

Image:

 

CmXRsFQWIAACzTK.jpg:small

 

I'm sure he will delete the tweet so I copied the image here for your viewing pleasure:

 

http://i.imgur.com/iPLAIQA.jpg

And here comes the double down!

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/politics/donald-trump-campaign.html?_r=0

 

Pissing off the jews.... always a winning strategy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eli G, I take it you aren't Jewish.  Am I right?

 

Even if the star in his retweet was a Jewish star, which is typically represented by the outlines of two opposing triangles (see the Israeli national flag), it wouldn't be derogatory.  The Jewish star is no more derogatory to Jews than the Christian Cross is to Christians because both are symbols of their religions.

 

It is fun, though, to watch people desperately try to make an issue out of something that isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eli G, I take it you aren't Jewish.  Am I right?

 

Even if the star in his retweet was a Jewish star, which is typically represented by the outlines of two opposing triangles (see the Israeli national flag), it wouldn't be derogatory.  The Jewish star is no more derogatory to Jews than the Christian Cross is to Christians because both are symbols of their religions.

 

It is fun, though, to watch people desperately try to make an issue out of something that isn't.

 

Unless the image was implying that she is corrupt because she is a Jew?  But that makes no sense because she is not Jewish.  I think people are looking for something that isn't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, a star of David plastered on top of a pile of money is not offensive to Jews at all. They love that.

 

By the a cross in itself is not offensive to Christians, but if you set that cross on fire, some of us may take offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is fun, though, to watch people desperately try to make an issue out of something that isn't."

 

The left has to move the discussion away from their corrupt candidate being made clean by the FBI and "their" attorney general.

 

Extreme carelessness vs gross negligence? You gotta to love how the rule of law is being applied here. Absolutely disgusting. 

 

Cardboard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...