Yeah I can't even get no more positive carry going with capital from my friend Peterffy. Now I understand why the yield curve inversions slam on the brakes.
Nah, just Kyosaki. I like the first few chapters of RD,PD and CF-Q. Listened to the UHAL and EQC calls recently too, could be relevant. EQC likes self storage and SFH. Variant perception there.
Yah. In the interest of disclosure, I've been taking crazy pills about buying these big REITs at like Detroit SFH rental home multiples and listening to real estate grifter audiobooks.
Kashkari is just a team player to the max isn't he? haha. I was forced to get long in my trend + value stuff so it's time for a big drawdown. It's funny how my subconscious rooting interest changes depending on the posture of that "system" even though it's not yuge relative to my capital.
I think I kind of get Goosehead; use technology to allow the model to work for smaller $$$ policies/transactions. I've used policy genius a couple of times. But not (remotely) at this price.
Interesting model. CBRE and co kind of have more diffuse cohorts on either side of their market making operation, but I suppose they don't have the recurring and mandatory purchase aspects.
100% agree. It seems they're also operated with the non profit goal of generating employment and maintaining state manufacturing capacity. Even if GM tries to make money, many of their huge competitors are not operated for that purpose. Industry is toxic waste no touch pile for me.
It seems like you gotta' have some systematic guardrails that give you a chance to catch those right tails and try to get some positive skew don't you? Max 100% down (if you don't average down) and infinity up. The distribution is not normal or random.