Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

the hottest new meme coin is....Bitcoin?

 

https://www.dlnews.com/research/btc-bull-token-soars-past-25m-in-presale-as-expert-tips-100x-gains-best-meme-coin-to-buy/

 

Not sure of the mechanics of how you can airdrop BTC on Ethereum - I have to guess that "$BTC" is some other bullshit token or is a reference to some version of wrapped BTC. But should then be referred to as wrapped BTC or wBTC instead. 

 

I will believe that the bull market is over when people start getting rich on this type of stuff. That will be the heigh of euphoria - people buying something that isn't BTC, but is tied to BTCs price/success, in hopes of getting rich buying something other than BTC. 

 

Would be nice of the crypto industry outside of BTC existed for something other than degenerate gambling on shitcoins, but here we are. All roads will eventually lead back to Bitcoin. In the meantime, capital will be eviscerated in alts space. 

Edited by TwoCitiesCapital
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, TwoCitiesCapital said:

 

I will believe that the bull market is over when people start getting rich on this type of stuff. That will be the heigh of euphoria - people buying something that isn't BTC, but is tied to BTCs price/success, in hopes of getting rich buying something other than BTC. 

 

Would be nice of the crypto industry outside of BTC existed for something other than degenerate gambling on shitcoins, but here we are. All roads will eventually lead back to Bitcoin. In the meantime, capital will be eviscerated in alts space. 

 

...MSTR enters the chat...

 

I agree that BTC is the real deal and everyone is trying to profit from it in other ways, but it isn't any different than degenerate r/WSB apes buying 0 DTE on SPY. I see this as the last gasp for shitcoins really though. Retail is largely dropping the memecoins and rotating to BTC and this is the last shot at trying to get some degenerate attention before the full rotation into BTC is complete and the others die off. 

Edited by Fly
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Fly said:

 

...MSTR enters the chat...

 

I agree that BTC is the real deal and everyone is trying to profit from it in other ways, but it isn't any different than degenerate r/WSB apes buying 0 DTE on SPY. I see this as the last gasp for shitcoins really though. Retail is largely dropping the memecoins and rotating to BTC and this is the last shot at trying to get some degenerate attention before the full rotation into BTC is complete and the others die off. 

 

Oh, trust me. I'm watching MSTR too. Trading at a 3-4x premium to NAV was worrisome. The recent correction has me feeling better about the path forward though. 

 

Last cycle was similar. MSTR traded higher/faster than BTC appreciated, topped earlier, and then the ratio of MSTR/BTC faded into BTCs top. Then alt coins rallies. Then everything died. So far, only MSTR has topped so there are more steps left if we follow the same pattern. 

 

I dunno when the 4-year cycle will break. Maybe it's this year. But if it continues, it implied a high sometime in the fall with highs significantly higher than we're at now. 

 

And if it is broken? All bets are off, but that also means the traditional 80+% decline is probably off the table too. 

Edited by TwoCitiesCapital
Posted
1 hour ago, Paarslaars said:

I think the cycle is already broken with ETF's and politics coming into play but we'll see.

 

I think it's possible. But people said the same with the launch of futures and futures ETFs and it played out the same. 

 

I know it WILL break. But until it does, I use it to guide me. 

Posted (edited)

Blockchain Valuation
Blockchains in general (whether L1s or L2s) have a couple sources of revenue from flows
.

The first is congestion fees, aka "base fees". The second is contention fees, aka "MEV".

Let's tackle contention fees first. IMO, with modern app and wallet design, we should expect MEV to increasingly flow upstream and be recaptured by apps, wallets, and/or users. Eventually almost all MEV will be recaptured by entities closer to flow originators, and downstream infrastructure like L1s and L2s should expect breadcrumbs from contention fees. In other words, chasing MEV is IMO likely long-term futile for L1s and L2s.

What about congestion fees? For Ethereum L1 historically the bottleneck was EVM execution. Considerations for consensus participant, things like disk I/O and state growth, were key drivers for setting a small execution gas limit. With modern blockchain design that use SNARKs or fraud proof games for scaling, we will increasingly live in a post-scarcity world for execution. The bottleneck then shifts to data availability, which is fundamentally scarce because Ethereum validators run on limited home internet connections, and in practice DAS only provides a linear ~100x scalability boost unlike fraud proofs and SNARKs which provide an essentially unbounded scalability boost.

So let's zoom into DA economics which I claim is the only sustainable source of flows for L1s. EIP-4844, which suddenly increased DA supply in a sizeable way through blobs, went into effect less than a year ago. The chart titled "Average Blob Count per Block" in this dashboard clearly shows demand growth for blobs over time (IMO largely driven by induced demand), with demand progressively growing from 1 blob/block, to 2 blobs/block, to 3 blobs/block. We're now saturating blob supply but are only at the beginning of blob price discovery, where low-value "spam" transactions are slowly being pushed away by economically-denser transactions.

If DA supply was left unchanged for a few months I'd expect hundreds of ETH burn per day from DA. However right now Ethereum L1 is in "growth mode", and the Pectra hard fork (coming within a few months) will double the target number of blobs per block, from 3 to 6. This DA supply flood should crush the blob fee market, and it will take a few months for demand to catch up again. As full danksharding is rolled-out over the next couple years there will be a cat-and-mouse game between DA supply and demand.

What about the long-term equilibrium? My thesis hasn't changed since my 2022 Devcon talk titled "ultra sound money". Long term I expect DA demand to outpace supply. Indeed, supply is fundamentally constrained by consensus participants running on home internet connections, and I don't think the equivalent of ~100 home internet connections of DA throughput is sufficient to satisfy world demand, especially as humans always find creative ways to consume more bandwidth. In ~10 years I expect Ethereum to settle 10M TPS (roughly 100 transactions per day per human) and even at little as $0.001/transaction is $1B/day of revenue 🙂

Of course, DA income is only part of the story for long-term value accrual of ETH. The two other important considerations are issuance and monetary premium—for those I would refer to my 2022 Devcon talk.

Source: 

 

Edited by [email protected]
Posted

From Stripe Annual Report:
Stablecoins: Room-temperature superconductors for financial services.

Stablecoins have four important properties relative to the status quo. They make money movement cheaper, they make money movement faster, they are decentralized and open-access (and thus globally available from day one), and they are programmable. Everything interesting follows from these characteristics.

https://assets.stripeassets.com/fzn2n1nzq965/2pt3yIHthraqR1KwXgr98U/df10795aac0205789956c89e0dfc4f1a/Stripe-annual-letter-2024.pdf

Posted
11 hours ago, [email protected] said:

From Stripe Annual Report:
Stablecoins: Room-temperature superconductors for financial services.

Stablecoins have four important properties relative to the status quo. They make money movement cheaper, they make money movement faster, they are decentralized and open-access (and thus globally available from day one), and they are programmable. Everything interesting follows from these characteristics.

https://assets.stripeassets.com/fzn2n1nzq965/2pt3yIHthraqR1KwXgr98U/df10795aac0205789956c89e0dfc4f1a/Stripe-annual-letter-2024.pdf

 

Why do stablecoins need to be programmable? Is this a backdoor to the CBDC tin foil hat paranoia coming true? 

 

Additionally, stablecoins only become programmable on a chain that supports smart contract type execution. USDt on the Lightning Network won't have that same level of programmability or control by a centralized entity. 

 

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Fly said:

 

Why do stablecoins need to be programmable? Is this a backdoor to the CBDC tin foil hat paranoia coming true? 

 

Additionally, stablecoins only become programmable on a chain that supports smart contract type execution. USDt on the Lightning Network won't have that same level of programmability or control by a centralized entity. 

 

 

 

Current finance system is similar to old Nokia phones - have functions but barely programable.

Stablecoin/Blockchain finance system is similar to iPhone - programable and people can create many apps on iPhones.

 

I don't understand your second point. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, [email protected] said:

 

Current finance system is similar to old Nokia phones - have functions but barely programable.

Stablecoin/Blockchain finance system is similar to iPhone - programable and people can create many apps on iPhones.

 

I don't understand your second point. 

 

The money layer itself doesn't need to be programmable, and shouldn't be if it will be a sound money. More complexities in the system create flaws that are exploited. Even without base layer flaws it creates attack vectors for smart contracts created by bad actors. Want to do some gee-whiz "DeFi"? Let's just call it what it is and centralize that action making it a bank that accepts the layer 1 token and offers yield. You don't want to create a bank because that comes with regulations and standards? Ahh... now we get to the root of the use case for "crypto."

 

My second point is that stablecoins can be transferred fast/cheap/globally/decentralized/247 with the lightning network as planned by Tether's announcement to do so. This doesn't come with the programmability function that ETH/SOL/etc offer, but I see that as a feature rather than a flaw. 

 

https://tether.io/news/tether-brings-usdt-to-bitcoins-lightning-network-ushering-in-a-new-era-of-unstoppable-technology/

Posted
10 hours ago, Fly said:

 

The money layer itself doesn't need to be programmable, and shouldn't be if it will be a sound money. More complexities in the system create flaws that are exploited. Even without base layer flaws it creates attack vectors for smart contracts created by bad actors. Want to do some gee-whiz "DeFi"? Let's just call it what it is and centralize that action making it a bank that accepts the layer 1 token and offers yield. You don't want to create a bank because that comes with regulations and standards? Ahh... now we get to the root of the use case for "crypto."

 

My second point is that stablecoins can be transferred fast/cheap/globally/decentralized/247 with the lightning network as planned by Tether's announcement to do so. This doesn't come with the programmability function that ETH/SOL/etc offer, but I see that as a feature rather than a flaw. 

 

https://tether.io/news/tether-brings-usdt-to-bitcoins-lightning-network-ushering-in-a-new-era-of-unstoppable-technology/

 

I still don't understand your point.

Are you saying that stablecoin on Bitcoin(Lighting Network) is good but stablecoin on ETH/SOL.. is not good?

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, [email protected] said:

 

I still don't understand your point.

Are you saying that stablecoin on Bitcoin(Lighting Network) is good but stablecoin on ETH/SOL.. is not good?

 

Who introduced the denarius?

The Roman Republic.

It died.

Who invented gold?

God.

It’s still alive.

How many examples do we have of stores of value debased by human nature?

Every single abstraction created by humans has been debased and manipulated.

As a base layer, we need a commodity that is of God-made origin, like gold, but digital native—a bridge between atoms and bits.

Just as gold was the PoW of the past, the denarius was the PoS.

The rest will play a part as actors, but they will not form a foundational monetary system.

The attempt to find the inventor of Bitcoin is a way to weaken its position in our minds.

Edited by Dave86ch
Posted

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114093526901586124

 

A U.S. Crypto Reserve will elevate this critical industry after years of corrupt attacks by the Biden Administration, which is why my Executive Order on Digital Assets directed the Presidential Working Group to move forward on a Crypto Strategic Reserve that includes XRP, SOL, and ADA. I will make sure the U.S. is the Crypto Capital of the World. We are MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

 

pumping his son's bags?

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, MungerWunger said:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114093526901586124

 

A U.S. Crypto Reserve will elevate this critical industry after years of corrupt attacks by the Biden Administration, which is why my Executive Order on Digital Assets directed the Presidential Working Group to move forward on a Crypto Strategic Reserve that includes XRP, SOL, and ADA. I will make sure the U.S. is the Crypto Capital of the World. We are MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

 

pumping his son's bags?

 

 

It is pretty unbelievable!  I don't remember seeing "including XRP SOL and ADA" in any executive order!

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/strengthening-american-leadership-in-digital-financial-technology/

Posted

Curious the timing.

 

Some evidence maybe they care about price as a reflection of their job approval (as has been suggested)?

 

So waited for a price correction before announcing to give a bump.

Posted (edited)

I am guessing his son holds those?

 

Don't see any sense in holding any other crypto than BTC but don't really care if they waste additional US tax payer money 😜

Edited by Paarslaars
Posted (edited)

half an hour later ...

 

And, obviously, BTC and ETH, as other valuable Cryptocurrencies, will be at the heart of the Reserve. I also love Bitcoin and Ethereum!

 

His son must've texted Trump that he forgot two 🤣

Edited by MungerWunger
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Paarslaars said:

I am guessing his son holds those?

 

Don't see any sense in holding any other crypto than BTC but don't really care if they waste additional US tax payer money 😜

 

I would like more details on list that tokens included, how inclusion is determined, and how inclusion/exclusion will be determined in the future...along with proposed weightings. 

 

I am surprised it happened so quickly - but the details on the size of the reserve, the weightings within it, and the timeframe to get there - so it may still be a nothing-burger or yet another way to funnel US taxpayer money into TRUMP coin which may be included next 🙄

 

As a US tax payer, I'd be concerned if the weighting of the non-Bitcoin tokens was significant.  At the very least we should start off with a rough market-cap approximation which would put ~65% in BTC, or more, into BTC. 

Edited by TwoCitiesCapital

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...