woodstove Posted October 16 Posted October 16 On 10/15/2024 at 10:27 AM, Xerxes said: There was a short CNBC interview with BRK board member back at the AGM, where she made it clear that there will be no regular dividends, but perhaps one day special dividend. Lots of talented investors, but how to tell them from lucky coin-flippers (per WEB intro to Ben Graham's Intelligent Investor)? If you don't know -- and life is uncertain -- I like the discipline of money manager given X capital to work with, "forced" to return about 4 pct of capital to investors. Can be a variety of ways - special or regular dividends, repurchases to reduce number of shares, spinoffs, etc. But having to make concrete return annually reduces a bit of the agent-ego risk. If business is well managed but context is difficult, and cannot return 4 pct of capital annually, well then, let the business shrink. One can play with the numbers and spreadsheets. It's the discipline that matters.
sholland Posted October 16 Posted October 16 23 hours ago, Jaygo said: Do you think anyone at HQ is looking at ACME Brink to ensure its being run in the best way possible….Managers must be managed and the bigger the wider the assortment of businesses the tougher this becomes. Buffett gets monthly numbers on all the businesses. Buffett and Munger believe that have having honest and able managers and getting out of their way (bureaucracy is like a cancer) is the reason that Berkshire works so well.
Eldad Posted October 23 Posted October 23 Greg Warren downgraded the moat to Narrow at Morningstar. Basically cap allocation brilliance going away. Too big combined with no WB. I agree.
Hektor Posted October 23 Posted October 23 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-23/warren-buffett-says-he-won-t-endorse-any-political-candidates Warren Buffett Says He Won’t Endorse Any Political Candidates Warren Buffett said he won’t back any political candidates, two weeks before US citizens head to the polls to elect the country’s next president. The 94-year-old billionaire’s position was laid out in a statement posted on the website of his conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Hektor Posted October 23 Posted October 23 From the BRK website https://berkshirehathaway.com/webfraud.pdf Fraudulent Claims Regarding Mr. Buffett’s Endorsements of Investment Products and Political Candidates In light of the increased usage of social media, there have been numerous fraudulent claims regarding Mr. Buffett’s endorsement of investment products as well as his endorsement and support of political candidates. Mr. Buffett does not currently and will not prospectively endorse investment products or endorse and support political candidates.
Eldad Posted October 23 Posted October 23 3 hours ago, Hektor said: From the BRK website https://berkshirehathaway.com/webfraud.pdf Fraudulent Claims Regarding Mr. Buffett’s Endorsements of Investment Products and Political Candidates In light of the increased usage of social media, there have been numerous fraudulent claims regarding Mr. Buffett’s endorsement of investment products as well as his endorsement and support of political candidates. Mr. Buffett does not currently and will not prospectively endorse investment products or endorse and support political candidates. Good decision. Crazy the political difference between Hillary and Kamala in just 8 years. But even if that is not the reason, good decision to keep your mouth shut.
Charlie Posted October 29 Posted October 29 (edited) Jim Grant says ‘the greatest equity investor’ — Warren Buffett — is trying to warn you about US stocks and is supposedly choosing this 1 asset class over equities. Should you follow suit? https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/jim-grant-says-the-greatest-equity-investor-warren-buffett-is-trying-to-warn-you-about-us-stocks-and-is-supposedly-choosing-this-1-asset-class-over-equities-should-you-follow-suit/ar-AA1t7Sx8?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=f28e9d8bad8040e39d30bb19615f5ab1&ei=12 Cheers! Edited October 29 by Charlie
John Hjorth Posted October 29 Posted October 29 1 hour ago, Charlie said: Jim Grant says ‘the greatest equity investor’ — Warren Buffett — is trying to warn you about US stocks and is supposedly choosing this 1 asset class over equities. Should you follow suit? https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/jim-grant-says-the-greatest-equity-investor-warren-buffett-is-trying-to-warn-you-about-us-stocks-and-is-supposedly-choosing-this-1-asset-class-over-equities-should-you-follow-suit/ar-AA1t7Sx8?ocid=msedgntp&pc=LCTS&cvid=f28e9d8bad8040e39d30bb19615f5ab1&ei=12 Cheers! 8 minutes ago, rogermunibond said: Treasury bills @Charlie & @rogermunibond, Personally, I think Jim Grant in the above doesn't really hit the disc with this assessment. The calculation for Berkshire is just so different on 'riding and rolling US Treasury Bills' than for almost everyone else, because - no matter what your view may be on it - a material part of those T-Bills can be argued to be financed by insurance float. Insurance float held by the undisputed world champion in generating, holding and maintaining insurance float. It is a low margin business, yes, so it requires scale. And scale there is, indeed.
73 Reds Posted October 29 Posted October 29 8 minutes ago, John Hjorth said: @Charlie & @rogermunibond, Personally, I think Jim Grant in the above doesn't really hit the disc with this assessment. The calculation for Berkshire is just so different on 'riding and rolling US Treasury Bills' than for almost everyone else, because - no matter what your view may be on it - a material part of those T-Bills can be argued to be financed by insurance float. Insurance float held by the undisputed world champion in generating, holding and maintaining insurance float. It is a low margin business, yes, so it requires scale. And scale there is, indeed. Has anyone made money following Jim Grant?
whatstheofficerproblem Posted November 4 Posted November 4 https://valueinvestorsclub.com/idea/BERKSHIRE_HATHAWAY/4105781453#description I want what this guy is smoking. The comments pretty much laugh at the write-up. The quality of VIC write-ups has been going downhill for a while.
Ulti Posted November 7 Posted November 7 https://brklyninvestor.com/2024/11/06/cash/ yay .. excellent read
fareastwarriors Posted November 9 Author Posted November 9 FT: Warren Buffett’s Apple share sales and cash pile spark intrigue over motives
Xerxes Posted November 10 Posted November 10 Buffett had said on record that he has no interest in Occidental. Yet given his view on inflation and the significance amount of liquidation of Apple and Bank of America positions, the pausing of the passive weekly purchases of Occidental, it is possible that Occidental may indeed the target. The M&A activity should be picking up across the board with the new regime in Washington.
sleepydragon Posted November 11 Posted November 11 1 hour ago, Xerxes said: Buffett had said on record that he has no interest in Occidental. Yet given his view on inflation and the significance amount of liquidation of Apple and Bank of America positions, the pausing of the passive weekly purchases of Occidental, it is possible that Occidental may indeed the target. The M&A activity should be picking up across the board with the new regime in Washington. if he has to get regulatory approval to buy up to 50% of shares, would be he allowed to buy the whole company? Also, if he want to buy the whole company, won’t he be buying more now?
Xerxes Posted November 11 Posted November 11 1 hour ago, sleepydragon said: if he has to get regulatory approval to buy up to 50% of shares, would be he allowed to buy the whole company? Also, if he want to buy the whole company, won’t he be buying more now? Any offer for the remaining 70% would have always been subject to regulatory approval. It is no different than had he owned none of it, and than made an offer. Like he did with Allenghany. Berkshire owns 30% or so; enough to have influence to block any major making a move toward it, for 3 years now. Maybe that was the reason for the passive stake.
LC Posted November 11 Posted November 11 3 hours ago, Xerxes said: Berkshire owns 30% or so; enough to have influence to block any major making a move toward it, for 3 years now. Maybe that was the reason for the passive stake. it does scream classic Buffett to strike some deal where OXY pays him a percentage to accumulate enough stock to block any takeovers.
scorpioncapital Posted November 11 Posted November 11 well he could sell his chevron stake and own 100% of oxy, I would imagine the total exposure to oil would be similar yet he'd control 100% of the cashflows.
sleepydragon Posted November 11 Posted November 11 Crude down 3% , OXY up almost 1%… can someone explain why is that?
Munger_Disciple Posted November 11 Posted November 11 Nothing new but a good article in WSJ: https://www.wsj.com/finance/investing/does-warren-buffett-know-something-that-we-dont-48fabc9d
Charlie Posted November 11 Posted November 11 2 hours ago, sleepydragon said: Crude down 3% , OXY up almost 1%… can someone explain why is that? Earnings and investor conference call are coming tomorrow. So people are buying in the hope of good news.
John Hjorth Posted November 14 Posted November 14 The Berkshire 2024 EOP Q3 13-F/HR is now available on the SEC website, and on Dataroma, for those interested.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now