Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think you may be right. While we all know WEB won't be with us forever, reading what appears to be a significant decline in his health, while not surprising, is somewhat sobering. I wonder if we will see him on stage in Omaha. It might be too much for him (which makes Charlie doing it every year until his death at 99 even more amazing). Long live WEB!

Posted

Definitely sobering. I'm reminded of his closing words at the end of last year's shareholders meeting:

"Thank you very, very much for coming. And I not only hope that you come next year but I hope I come next year."

 

It definitely struck me at the time as a different tone, which was understandable in the wake of Charlie's passing. Long live WEB, indeed.

Posted
1 minute ago, Libs said:

Thanks GFP. After reading this I'm more comfortable with Abel running things.

one of my big worries for sometime has been the "de-centralized" approach, while I understand leaving good managers alone to do their jobs, but I think it's easy for things to "slip" a bit over time. We, as humans, seem pre-programed for the ABC's of business decay (as Warren puts it). So, to be clear, de-central probably won't change in a big way, but I like Greg's "more active touch" with the subs. I think Greg's hardest job is keeping many of those long-time managers motivated to keep working without pissing on their grass.

Posted (edited)

Last week I noticed this Berkshire Hathaway Finance shelf registration renewal used Baker McKenzie and didn't think much of it but thought it was maybe the first time I had seen a big firm other than MTO.  Seems like Barrons is picking up on the change -

 

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1067983/000119312525018070/0001193125-25-018070-index.htm

 

https://www.barrons.com/articles/berkshire-hathaway-baker-mckenzie-munger-2bd55504

 

Quote

During 2024, Baker McKenzie added a 17-member corporate law team from Munger, Tolles & Olson in what the firm called a move to expand its deals team. One of the firm’s lawyers, Leif King, called the group “one of the truly elite transactional groups in California” in a Bloomberg Law interview at the time.

 

The move appears to be paying off given Baker McKenzie’s role in the Berkshire bond deals. One of those lawyers, Judith Kitano, is listed on the new Berkshire prospectus.

 

Edited by gfp
Posted
2 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said:

Berkhsire's new 13F will be interesting to say the least

 

Because you are curious how much BAC he sold?  Or you think there will be other major changes?  Seems like this next one will be awfully boring and predictable but you never know.  Do we get the 10Q before the 13F?  10Q should reveal the moves on the top few positions.

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said:

Not too boring or predictable if you ask me...

 

Screenshot2025-02-03135447.thumb.png.9f9f4284cc04875d2ca7d28cec499fbf.png

wasn't the apple sale pretty much announced at the AGM and then followed up on. Everything else aside from BAC is peanuts. Net change aside from Apple and BAC is meaningless.

image.png.67cdb1942728eaef98c2c2bf3840749f.png

Edited by hasilp89
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Munger_Disciple said:

I predict BAC was sold completely (90% probability), and there is a 50% chance Buffett sold all the remaining Apple shares in Q4. 

 

At the rate he was selling BAC I'm not sure there was enough time for him to completely sell it out in Q4.  He could have stepped up the pace once he had confidentiality but it seems like he usually moves this aircraft carrier a little slower than that.  If he blew out all the BAC in Q4 that would certainly send a message.

 

edit - I asked chatGPT and it told me he would have had to have averaged 14.74 million shares per day on each of the 52 days the NYSE was open between 10/16 and 12/31.

 

That's a lot of stock but I suppose it's doable.  Just not very Warren-like

 

This screenshot was his pre-privacy rate ->

 

Screenshot 2025-02-03 at 3.12.30 PM.png

Edited by gfp
Posted
17 minutes ago, Munger_Disciple said:

I predict BAC was sold completely (90% probability), and there is a 50% chance Buffett sold all the remaining Apple shares in Q4. 

 

That would be $100 billion of additional cash if you're correct

Posted
21 minutes ago, gfp said:

 

At the rate he was selling BAC I'm not sure there was enough time for him to completely sell it out in Q4.  He could have stepped up the pace once he had confidentiality but it seems like he usually moves this aircraft carrier a little slower than that.  If he blew out all the BAC in Q4 that would certainly send a message.

 

edit - I asked chatGPT and it told me he would have had to have averaged 14.74 million shares per day on each of the 52 days the NYSE was open between 10/16 and 12/31.

 

That's a lot of stock but I suppose it's doable.  Just not very Warren-like

 

This screenshot was his pre-privacy rate ->

 

Screenshot 2025-02-03 at 3.12.30 PM.png

I got the feeling that once he started selling BAC he was done with it.  It is interesting that he continues to hold AXP as quite a legacy investment and seems to hold that stock (and even KO) to a different standard even though both companies have lost a significant part of their moat over time. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

t is interesting that he continues to hold AXP as quite a legacy investment and seems to hold that stock (and even KO) to a different standard even though both companies have lost a significant part of their moat over time. 

 

He 'gon be alright

spacer.png

Posted
51 minutes ago, gfp said:

 

At the rate he was selling BAC I'm not sure there was enough time for him to completely sell it out in Q4.  He could have stepped up the pace once he had confidentiality but it seems like he usually moves this aircraft carrier a little slower than that.  If he blew out all the BAC in Q4 that would certainly send a message.

 

edit - I asked chatGPT and it told me he would have had to have averaged 14.74 million shares per day on each of the 52 days the NYSE was open between 10/16 and 12/31.

 

That's a lot of stock but I suppose it's doable.  Just not very Warren-like

 

This screenshot was his pre-privacy rate ->

 

Screenshot 2025-02-03 at 3.12.30 PM.png

 

It's possible Buffett didn't sell all of BAC in Q4 but sold the remainder in Q1 '25. Buffett blew out of positions when he wanted to; an example would be airlines in 2020. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Munger_Disciple said:

I predict BAC was sold completely (90% probability), and there is a 50% chance Buffett sold all the remaining Apple shares in Q4. 

Given how heavily he was selling Apple in the 220's it would be extremely illogical for him not to have sold what he could when Apple was in the 250's.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Spooky said:

 

... Wish I knew what they know about this company.

 

 

If I had to guess, they probably have a different view on the terminal value of the spectrum than the average investor.  If the company can continue to generate free cash flow to buy in shares and pay down debt, by the time the core radio business peters out the spectrum they own between Xm and Sirius could be worth a lot.  In the meantime it's got a DaVita kind of thing going on.  I assume it is Ted Weschler for that reason but I forgot which one I decided it was from the broker used.

 

It's funny that this company went straight from being controlled by Liberty to being controlled by Berkshire.

Edited by gfp
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, gfp said:

 

If I had to guess, they probably have a different view on the terminal value of the spectrum than the average investor.  If the company can continue to generate free cash flow to buy in shares and pay down debt, by the time the core radio business peters out the spectrum they own between Xm and Sirius could be worth a lot.  In the meantime it's got a DaVita kind of thing going on.  I assume it is Ted Weschler for that reason but I forgot which one I decided it was from the broker used.

 

It's funny that this company went straight from being controlled by Liberty to being controlled by Berkshire.

 

Interesting hypothesis. However it's a pretty narrow bandwidth spectrum (audio only) so I am not sure why it would be worth significant $$$. Plus they can't really sell it until satellite radio service is no longer viable so it might be several years out. And if they want to repurpose it for terrestrial use, they have to get FCC permission to do so. 

Edited by Munger_Disciple
Posted
10 hours ago, gfp said:

 

If I had to guess, they probably have a different view on the terminal value of the spectrum than the average investor.  If the company can continue to generate free cash flow to buy in shares and pay down debt, by the time the core radio business peters out the spectrum they own between Xm and Sirius could be worth a lot.  In the meantime it's got a DaVita kind of thing going on.  I assume it is Ted Weschler for that reason but I forgot which one I decided it was from the broker used.

 

It's funny that this company went straight from being controlled by Liberty to being controlled by Berkshire.

 

Interesting. I'm fairly certain it is a Ted investment.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...