mcliu

Good topic to see psychology at work. Herd mentality, confirmation bias, etc. May: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/putin-very-ill-blood-cancer-070511658.html July: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/20/cia-putin-health-00047046 In other news, the CIA Director William Burns appeared to pour cold water on widespread rumors that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be ill, saying there was no evidence backing up such speculation. He added that Putin was “entirely too healthy.”

Why do you think that rates will be back to 2-3% in a few years? Because inflation will subside?

https://www.france24.com/en/video/20220704-ukraine-withdraws-from-battered-lysychansk-russia-claims-major-victory https://www.dw.com/en/ukraines-envoy-to-germany-irks-israeli-polish-governments-with-wwii-comments/a-62335288 Andriy Melnyk,Ukraine's outspoken ambassador to Germany, drew the ire of Poland, Israel, and Jewish groups on Friday when he defended Ukrainian nationalist leader Stepan Bandera in an interview. ... "The statement made by the Ukrainian ambassador is a distortion of the historical facts, belittles the Holocaust and is an insult to those who were murdered by Bandera and his people," the Israeli embassy said. Polish deputy Foreign Minister Marcin Przydacz wrote on a local online platform that "such an opinion and such words are absolutely unacceptable." https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/why-is-a-monument-commemorating-a-nazi-ss-division-still-standing-outside-of-toronto The ‘Banderists’ in particular saw Jews as the “vanguard of Muscovite imperialism,” and were openly willing to commit barbarous crimes against them, as they believed it would lead to Ukraine’s independence from Russia and the Soviet Union. In 1941, under the OUN-B’s command, the Ukrainian People’s Militia spearheaded pogroms which led to the massacre of more than 6,000 Jews in Lviv.

Gas & Diesel:

FYI:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-rich-worlds-climate-hypocrisy-energy-fossil-fuel-wind-solar-panel-india-poverty-power-battery-storage-11655654331?mod=mhp The developed world became wealthy through the pervasive use of fossil fuels, which still overwhelmingly power most of its economies. Solar and wind power aren’t reliable, simply because there are nights, clouds and still days. Improving battery storage won’t help much: There are enough batteries in the world today only to power global average electricity consumption for 75 seconds. Even though the supply is being scaled up rapidly, by 2030 the world’s batteries would still cover less than 11 minutes. Every German winter, when solar output is at its minimum, there is near-zero wind energy available for at least five days—or more than 7,000 minutes.

It is possible that current correction is just a reversion from the artificially inflated markets of 2021 (through massive stimulus and speculative sentiment) and that markets have not priced in a prolonged economic downturn or higher interest rates. Psychologically, people are anchored to the prices of late 2021. Valuations for some stocks are attractive at current interest rates, but fair/over-valued at higher rates. We have not seen valuations go far below fair value which tends to happen during downturns/real capitulations.

Inflation also harms the middle/lower classes far more than the rich. Raising rates to reduce demand is one way of lower inflation. Reducing fiscal spending would also help but is much less politically palatable. Then there's also policies to increase supply. Problem with energy-driven inflation in the current political environment is that raising rates is really the only viable option.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/reducing-inflation-come-great-cost-stagflation-ray-dalio/ Because debt assets and liabilities are now very high and because government deficits will remain high, it is virtually impossible for the Fed to push interest rates to levels that are high enough to adequately compensate holders of debt assets for inflation without them being too high to support strong debtors, strong markets, and a strong economy. If the holders of debt don’t get adequate returns they will sell them, which worsens the free market debt supply/demand picture, which either leads to a dramatic cutback in private credit (which is depressing) or the central bank creating more money and buying more debt to fill in the funding hole (which is inflationary). In summary my main points are that 1) there isn’t anything that the Fed can do to fight inflation without creating economic weakness, 2) with debt assets and liabilities as high as they are and projected to increase due to the government deficit, and the Fed also selling government debt, it is likely that private credit growth will have to contract, weakening the economy, and 3) over the long run the Fed will most likely chart a middle course that will take the form of stagflation.

Western elites are shooting themselves in the foot with ESG & sanctions and hoping the bullets will ricochet and hit Russia. We need to stop meddling around the world and focus on making our own country better.

It is good to be reminded of the basics. Sometimes people forget and get caught up by the markets. Investing is simple but not easy!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_fossil_fuel_vehicles#Places_with_planned_fossil-fuel_vehicle_restrictions Several countries starting 2030 and earlier. Most around 2035, 2040. Couple this with emerging market growth and you can see crude growth for several decades still. https://www.rystadenergy.com/newsevents/news/press-releases/global-energy-spending-set-to-reach-record-high-of-over-2-trillion-in-2022-led-by-oil-and-gas/ $658B to maintain 99.6mbbl/d. Costs are also increasing due to inflation. https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/european-banks-cut-fossil-fuel-financing-unlike-north-american-peers-8211-report-69564218 European banks cutting financing. On a personal level, if you ran a major company like BP/Shell, you'll be less hated by the public & politicians if you diverted capex to solar/wind. Sometimes it's not a rational decision. All of these little things might compound into a major shortage somewhere down the road. As Munger calls the lollapalooza effect.

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/ukrainian-military-unit-russia-artillery-1365021/ A big part of the problem in defending this part of Donbas, Ostap believes, is that the people who have stayed behind — the people who haven’t fled — don’t really believe they are part of Ukraine. In his view, the civilians who remain are all separatist sympathizers. He says they help the Russians navigate backcountry roads that aren’t on the maps. “Yeah, they’re all waiting for Russkiy mir,” Mace says, laughing when I ask his opinion about the locals. Russkiy mir, or “Russian world,” is the revanchist concept that Russia needs to restore its central role in the affairs of its neighbors, and its borders, to what they were at the height of the Soviet empire. He asserts there have been instances of local collaborators getting caught providing information about Ukrainian troop movements or locations. Indeed, Slovyansk fell to Russian separatists in 2014: The retaking of the city by the Ukrainian military later that summer was the first major battle in Donbas. “Almost everyone here is pro-Russian. But you can’t arrest people just for that,” Mace says. In any case, the police and the SBU —Ukraine’s internal security service — were doing what they could. “The SBU even arrested a couple of people in our brigade,” he says.

I think the fundamentals for crude has not changed. The current supply crisis is driven by lack of re-investment due to poor energy policy and the Ukraine crisis. Oil is a constantly depleting resources, you need to invest a large amount (maybe >600B annually) just to maintain production, let alone grow. Current developed country policy is to ban ICE vehicles by 2030 and eventually kill the fossil fuel industry. No company will want to make large long-term investments in this type of environment. Investors are also demanding quick return of capital for the same reason. In addition, the hurdle for re-investment continues to go up with higher interest rates and just plain lack of financing as banks also pursue ESG goals. A major recession will likely crimp demand in the short-term, but given the fragile political situation and despite the tough talk from Powell, I think countries are likely to ease far sooner and run negative real-rate policy than to suffer a major downturn.

Energy prices underlie everything. With the current unrealistic ESG policies, it'll be hard to get supply growth in energy. I think it'll be difficult to reduce inflation unless you have a drastic decline in demand.

It seems like most Americans cheer the start of every war/proxy war, ex. Afghanistan, Iraq, now Ukraine, etc. And then a years later that the money & lives could have been better used at home. Also disturbing is that many Americans will rightly denounce right-wing extremism in the US but will happily support neo-nazi/extremist groups abroad as long as they're fighting for the "proper" side. I agree, no matter what, it's a sad outcome for Ukrainians either way to be dragged into this proxy war instead of negotiating peace. Seems like the sanctions are backfiring on Europe too. Inflation hitting records. Factories shutting down due to high input costs, furthering reducing supply and increasing costs. Meanwhile, India & China are buying record amounts of Russian energy. Rouble is higher than pre-war.

Short Apple. COVID stimulus over. Innovation cycle slowing. Phone adoption peaking. Market still pricing in rapid growth.

This is the problem with sanctions. The elites are fine and regular people suffer. When people feel under attack they rally around the govt. NK developed a nuke under sanctions/starvation for decades. Russia is far more capable and already has far more destructive weapons. What's the purpose of driving Russians into a corner? In my opinion, the best way for the West to defend itself is to invest in its own people, infrastructure and capabilities so that it far far surpasses its rivals, instead of trying to police/invade/coup/sanction around the world.

A more cynical view, maybe the West wants Ukraine to be Russia's Vietnam. Ukraine is a proxy war and the US/NATO will fight the Russians until the last Ukrainian. Ukraine gets totally destroyed, but the West will have a big win over Russia. Isn't that called Terrorism?

BBC also reported this: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60522454. Ukraine has honoured 13 soldiers who were killed defending a tiny island after reportedly swearing at a Russian ship that ordered them to surrender. In unverified audio clips, the borders guards defending Zmiinyi Island in the Black Sea are told to "lay down your weapons" or "be bombed". "Russian warship, go to hell," they respond. Ukraine says they were then killed by air and sea strikes. Russia denies the account, saying they all surrendered. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky has awarded each of the guards the posthumous title of "Hero of Ukraine". "On our Zmiinyi Island, defending it to the last, all the border guards died heroically," Mr Zelensky said. https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/28/europe/snake-island-ukraine-russia-survivors-alive-intl/index.html

Yeah exactly, it should be obvious to anyone alive today that Hitler did some evil shit. Which is why I think it’s a mistake that media outlets like CNN and PBS allowed neo-Nazis on their shows just because they’re on our side fighting Russians now.

Exactly, politicians & countries are all the same. There's no morality in geopolitics, only interests. And the winner writes the history.

If you agree that the West does propaganda as well, if not better, than Russia, China then maybe it's possible that the mainstream Western narrative of Ukraine getting attacked unprovoked might be a product of Western propaganda? Maybe the truth lies somewhere between the Russian narrative and the Western narrative? Maybe Mearsheimer is not completely wrong? https://www.mearsheimer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Why-the-Ukraine-Crisis-Is.pdf And maybe the West is not sending weapons to Ukraine because of its benevolence and love for Ukrainian people (as the media portrays) but maybe it's an attempt to engage in a proxy war using Ukrainians to bleed Russians. Maybe the USA govt doesn't care if Ukraine gets destroyed and thousands of Ukrainians die as long as it weakens Russia? I don't think anyone is under the impression that Russian/Chinese media isn't hypocritical. But I think many Westerners think Western media is the arbiter of truth with all the "fact-checking". Everyone else, like the Russians & Chinese are brainwashed because they view the world differently. Just like the liberals think conservatives are brainwashed, vice-versa.

Which current NATO country has Neo-nazi mayors, a Neo-nazi battalion within their armed forces and Neo-nazi govt officials? Please name some. I'm not saying Ukraine is the third reich, but is there really no nazi problem? https://forward.com/opinion/416751/why-does-no-one-care-that-neo-nazis-are-gaining-power-in-ukraine/ I am not here to justify Russia's invasion. War is horrible and civilians suffer. Elites are fine. My point is Western hypocrisy: NATO elites & Ukrainian govt played equal role in escalation with Russia. MSM hypocrisy, fake news, narrative creation: Proud Boys bad, Azov good. Russia bad, Ukraine good.

Like this guy right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepan_Bandera Another Hero of Ukraine. Sorry, my bad. Let me follow your logic. Ukraine good. Russia bad. Ukraine good. Russia bad. Ukraine good. Russia bad.