Vish_ram Posted Monday at 09:43 PM Posted Monday at 09:43 PM How and what assets will get added into this fund? I can imagine if NIH funds a biotech or licenses a patent, the warrants/stock can be in this fund. What about SBR (BTC)? will that be in this fund?
Gregmal Posted Monday at 09:46 PM Posted Monday at 09:46 PM Let me guess, the same people whom are always critical of Trump, will now present us their bs analytical case for why this is stupid or unnecessary or doesnt make any sense?
Paarslaars Posted Monday at 09:47 PM Posted Monday at 09:47 PM Interesting. With the risk of completely derailing the thread: both of them are pro BTC I believe.
73 Reds Posted Monday at 09:48 PM Posted Monday at 09:48 PM 1 minute ago, Gregmal said: Let me guess, the same people whom are always critical of Trump, will now present us their bs analytical case for why this is stupid or unnecessary or doesnt make any sense? I think it needs to be approved by Congress so if it happens, it happens pretty quickly. Could be bullish for BRK.....
thepupil Posted Monday at 09:56 PM Posted Monday at 09:56 PM 3 minutes ago, Gregmal said: Let me guess, the same people whom are always critical of Trump, will now present us their bs analytical case for why this is stupid or unnecessary or doesnt make any sense? seems like a decent starting description to me. I'm old enough to remember when the republicans wanted to privatize SS, not seize it for benefit of cryptocronies / pet projects / etc. of course detail is so scant that anyone's pre-existing biases will be confirmed. arguing over the merits of a strange hypothetical SWF is almost certainly a fruitless exercise.
Blake Hampton Posted Monday at 10:11 PM Posted Monday at 10:11 PM Sorry, I almost forgot about Elon: 90% - DJT 10% - TSLA
thowed Posted Monday at 10:17 PM Posted Monday at 10:17 PM 25 minutes ago, Gregmal said: Let me guess, the same people whom are always critical of Trump, will now present us their bs analytical case for why this is stupid or unnecessary or doesnt make any sense? Not normally (publically) critical of Trump. Maybe this is a stupid question, but... why have a Sovereign Wealth Fund when you have a lot of Sovereign Debt? Norway is a slightly different beast.
dwy000 Posted Monday at 10:26 PM Posted Monday at 10:26 PM 36 minutes ago, Gregmal said: Let me guess, the same people whom are always critical of Trump, will now present us their bs analytical case for why this is stupid or unnecessary or doesnt make any sense? I think it's a really interesting idea as long as it's managed completely independently. The real question is where's the money going to come from? Most countries use their trade surpluses. When you're running $tn deficits you need every penny you can find to keep the lights on. To be meaningful this needs to be a $trillion fund.
Blake Hampton Posted Monday at 10:28 PM Posted Monday at 10:28 PM (edited) I don't think establishing a sovereign wealth fund during record high market valuations is a good idea. But what do I know? Edited Monday at 10:29 PM by Blake Hampton
dwy000 Posted Monday at 10:34 PM Posted Monday at 10:34 PM 4 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said: I don't think establishing a sovereign wealth fund during record high market valuations is a good idea. But what do I know? It doesn't have to invest in stocks. If you're doing something for the next 100 years the current valuations are somewhat moot.
73 Reds Posted Monday at 10:35 PM Posted Monday at 10:35 PM 4 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said: I don't think establishing a sovereign wealth fund during record high market valuations is a good idea. But what do I know? Why would that be a material issue? Does every SWF, and every professional money manager hold only cash? Should they all shut down?
Blake Hampton Posted Monday at 10:38 PM Posted Monday at 10:38 PM 1 minute ago, dwy000 said: It doesn't have to invest in stocks. If you're doing something for the next 100 years the current valuations are somewhat moot. Weren't these the same people talking about how the governmental bureaucracy is stupid and inefficient?
Blake Hampton Posted Monday at 10:39 PM Posted Monday at 10:39 PM Why are we creating a wealth fund when we should really be focusing on the budget? Where is this money going to come from exactly?
Gregmal Posted Monday at 10:39 PM Posted Monday at 10:39 PM I think it’s interesting to see government trying to do things differently. I don’t know how there is a single critic in the world complaining about DOGE…yea, reigning in waste…horrible idea. Sovereign fund? IDK let’s explore it. Hard balling tariffs to get border secured…ok…what’s the problem? Already seeing it make some waves. Bottom line is government is broken and a failure. It’s the NY highway problem at the route of what a lot of this is seeking to solve. Ask the NYS officials to build a highway and it takes 3x as long as private sector would’ve, at 3x the cost. Footed by taxpayers whom are already getting robbed. These sorta ideas are a step towards ridding ourselves of that crap.
Gregmal Posted Monday at 10:39 PM Posted Monday at 10:39 PM 11 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said: I don't think establishing a sovereign wealth fund during record high market valuations is a good idea. But what do I know? Never woulda guessed.
Blake Hampton Posted Monday at 10:40 PM Posted Monday at 10:40 PM 5 minutes ago, dwy000 said: It doesn't have to invest in stocks. If you're doing something for the next 100 years the current valuations are somewhat moot. What else is it going to invest in? Bitcoin?
Gregmal Posted Monday at 10:41 PM Posted Monday at 10:41 PM It’s supply and demand. Another superpower in the market for assets? Guess what happens to the price of assets?
Blake Hampton Posted Monday at 10:43 PM Posted Monday at 10:43 PM 2 minutes ago, Gregmal said: It’s supply and demand. Another superpower in the market for assets? Guess what happens to the price of assets? The bubble gets bigger
Gregmal Posted Monday at 10:48 PM Posted Monday at 10:48 PM 2 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said: The bubble gets bigger Your cash on one side, betting against the hourglass, waiting for sovereign nations that can print their own cash…. to leave the game so you can get your 13.5x EPS number….good luck with that.
sholland Posted Monday at 11:10 PM Posted Monday at 11:10 PM 1 hour ago, Vish_ram said: How and what assets will get added into this fund? The government owns warrants for 79.9% of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which Ackman estimates could be worth $300B over time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now