Hektor Posted February 7, 2024 Posted February 7, 2024 5 hours ago, Parsad said: That might be tough. Cheers! https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-facing-us-financial-crisis-234945940.html And this doesn't make it any easier for China, I think. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/07/business/economy/united-states-china-mexico-trade.html For First Time in Two Decades, U.S. Buys More From Mexico Than China The United States bought more goods from Mexico than China in 2023 for the first time in 20 years, evidence of how much global trade patterns have shifted.
james22 Posted February 7, 2024 Posted February 7, 2024 China is going to make Japan's real estate bubble look insignificant.
Hektor Posted February 7, 2024 Posted February 7, 2024 Also, the game of tariffs and avoiding tarrifs https://www.wsj.com/economy/trade/a-china-u-s-decoupling-you-aint-seen-nothing-yet-12c0828e?mod=hp_lead_pos6 https://archive.is/E3ysM A China-U.S. Decoupling? You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet Tariffs haven’t reduced U.S. trade links with China much. Would a 60% rate do it?
james22 Posted February 7, 2024 Posted February 7, 2024 The Chinese economy is already sucking. If the housing oversupply is really as bad as Zeihan makes out, China is in for an economic upheaval that makes 1929 look like a mild case of the hiccups. https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=57128
Gmthebeau Posted February 7, 2024 Posted February 7, 2024 The average US investor has no ability to analyze China. Have you traveled there? Hit the ground talking to people, companies, etc? China is notorious for lying, fraud, fake accounting, entire companies that are total frauds. If you are hellbent on investing in China at least hire a fund manager who lives there or Hong Kong. Otherwise, stop wasting your time and money on this garbage.
james22 Posted February 7, 2024 Posted February 7, 2024 He Keng, a former deputy head of the National Bureau of Statistics, spoke on Saturday about the struggling housing market in China. When commenting on its vast oversupply of homes, He said some experts have suggested that these empty homes available in China would be enough to accommodate a whopping 3 billion people. "How many vacant homes are there now?" said He at an economic forum in the city of Dongguan. "The experts are presenting figures that vary greatly. The most extreme believe the number of vacant homes are now enough for 3 billion people. We only have 1.4 billion people." "That estimate might be a bit much, but 1.4 billion people probably can't live in all of them," He added. https://archive.ph/psE7c#selection-1685.0-1699.50 LOL
ValueArb Posted February 8, 2024 Posted February 8, 2024 On 2/7/2024 at 2:05 PM, james22 said: He Keng, a former deputy head of the National Bureau of Statistics, spoke on Saturday about the struggling housing market in China. When commenting on its vast oversupply of homes, He said some experts have suggested that these empty homes available in China would be enough to accommodate a whopping 3 billion people. "How many vacant homes are there now?" said He at an economic forum in the city of Dongguan. "The experts are presenting figures that vary greatly. The most extreme believe the number of vacant homes are now enough for 3 billion people. We only have 1.4 billion people." "That estimate might be a bit much, but 1.4 billion people probably can't live in all of them," He added. https://archive.ph/psE7c#selection-1685.0-1699.50 LOL China has solved the homeless crisis and all the west can do is criticize, SMH!
Parsad Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 So much for Evergrande's bond holders...I wonder what the CCP reaction would be to bondholders in other companies if they failed. Cheers! https://finance.yahoo.com/news/99-bond-wipeout-hands-hedge-110000940.html
Hektor Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 “So US and European hedge funds piled into the debt, envisioning big payouts to juice their returns.” Did they not hedge?
formthirteen Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 The CCP is clearly not interested in sharing common profits with foreign investors. From now on, I will definitely assume 99% of profits from BABA and other Chinese utilities will not reach foreign investors until it's been proven otherwise; I have no interest in giving my money to the CCP. Sometimes greed get's the better of me though. BABA no more, LOL.
Parsad Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 6 minutes ago, formthirteen said: The CCP is clearly not interested in sharing common profits with foreign investors. From now on, I will definitely assume 99% of profits from BABA and other Chinese utilities will not reach foreign investors until it's been proven otherwise; I have no interest in giving my money to the CCP. Sometimes greed get's the better of me though. BABA no more, LOL. I think they have to. Think about how big the non-performing real estate loan portfolio must be in China...if Evergrande is $260B in assets...think 10-15 times that at a minimum. It's like the government warrants issued by US banks during the GFC...they want to recover losses if there is any upside! So, any value left in these companies after equity and bond holders are wiped out, is money the CCP is going to use to stabilize the system and refill their coffers for stimulus or losses already incurred. Foreign governments and entities can withstand China exposure losses...but China cannot withstand China's own losses! So international investors...suck it up! Cheers!
ICUMD Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 The wager here is that if the CCP wants to get the donkey (economy) to move, they will now need to dangle more than a single carrot. It's not just a 'want' anymore, but a need. They have no alternative. Countries like China cannot progress without FDI. They are getting desperate. Let's see what treats they have in store. Things are bound to get worse before they get better.
Luke Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 Its hard to hold chinese positions due to the horrible sentiment and bleak outlook/capitulation. I also get doubts sometimes and need some inner dialogue to maintain being bullish but its hard. It speaks for the distress and dislocation in the market.
mattee2264 Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 Perhaps the analogy doesn't work with China. But for the USA at least I have a healthy respect for the power of shock-and-awe bailouts/stimulus to lift markets. And for the know-nothing investor index funds are probably the vehicle of choice with the added benefit that if the plunge protection team decides it wants to support markets it will buy index funds. MSCI China is at levels last seen almost 15 years ago. While some of that does reflect that GDP growth has been offset by massive dilution of shareholders with probably some more to come especially in financial/property institutions because the bath has been thrown off with the bathwater if you buy the index you'll end up owning some of the companies that will see an impressive recovery when the crisis is over.
Spekulatius Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 (edited) 6 hours ago, Parsad said: I think they have to. Think about how big the non-performing real estate loan portfolio must be in China...if Evergrande is $260B in assets...think 10-15 times that at a minimum. It's like the government warrants issued by US banks during the GFC...they want to recover losses if there is any upside! So, any value left in these companies after equity and bond holders are wiped out, is money the CCP is going to use to stabilize the system and refill their coffers for stimulus or losses already incurred. Foreign governments and entities can withstand China exposure losses...but China cannot withstand China's own losses! So international investors...suck it up! Cheers! I think the holes are going to be plugged by bond holders of these companies, banks and insurance (Ping An etc) cos who are going to be forced to buy assets. China has the so called “National Team” to do this. Tech is only indirectly affected via economic malaise and deflation. Think what happened during the GFC and housing bubble - same issue although the players are different. In both cases, the goal was to save the existing financial system. I believe China will drag the solution out over many years unlike the GFC. Tech will be the first one to bounce back, just like what happened to the GFC in the US and rest if the world. All they really need to do is ease up on tech regulation but that’s a different issue than the Evergrande Chinese housing bubble. Edited February 9, 2024 by Spekulatius
Hektor Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 8 hours ago, Parsad said: It's like the government warrants issued by US banks during the GFC...they want to recover losses if there is any upside! The situation sounds to me more like the Fannie/Freddie saga in the US.
Blake Hampton Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 11 hours ago, formthirteen said: The CCP is clearly not interested in sharing common profits with foreign investors. From now on, I will definitely assume 99% of profits from BABA and other Chinese utilities will not reach foreign investors until it's been proven otherwise; I have no interest in giving my money to the CCP. Sometimes greed get's the better of me though. BABA no more, LOL. I want to start by saying that I'm not an advocate for investment in China. I followed Munger into BABA and then proceeded to slowly bleed to death until I decided that China was a no-go, especially when I thought about the structure of ADRs. However, I don't see anything wrong with this particular situation, I believe bondholders should be punished. They are essentially financing a company that built property developments on down payments without ever finishing them. The bottom line is the customers who were sold a false promise are higher up on the claim ladder than some foreign bond owners.
Hektor Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 54 minutes ago, blakehampton said: However, I don't see anything wrong with this particular situation, I believe bondholders should be punished. They are essentially financing a company that built property developments on down payments without ever finishing them. The bottom line is the customers who were sold a false promise are higher up on the claim ladder than some foreign bond owners. +1
SongDonkey.AI Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 Read the latest issue of Economist! Guys!
Parsad Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 10 hours ago, Luca said: Its hard to hold chinese positions due to the horrible sentiment and bleak outlook/capitulation. I also get doubts sometimes and need some inner dialogue to maintain being bullish but its hard. It speaks for the distress and dislocation in the market. That generally is when markets start to get towards a bottom...you need that capitulation where essentially everyone bails one day/one week. The more you start to doubt yourself, the closer you are to the bottom. Cheers!
Parsad Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 5 hours ago, Hektor said: The situation sounds to me more like the Fannie/Freddie saga in the US. Yes, exactly...very similar. Cheers!
Parsad Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 2 hours ago, blakehampton said: I want to start by saying that I'm not an advocate for investment in China. I followed Munger into BABA and then proceeded to slowly bleed to death until I decided that China was a no-go, especially when I thought about the structure of ADRs. However, I don't see anything wrong with this particular situation, I believe bondholders should be punished. They are essentially financing a company that built property developments on down payments without ever finishing them. The bottom line is the customers who were sold a false promise are higher up on the claim ladder than some foreign bond owners. Sure. Bond holders would naturally take a cut after stock holders are wiped out and there isn't enough in assets. But in this case, there is and bond holders who naturally would be the owners of the remaining assets are also being wiped out. That's not right. That wouldn't happen in virtually every other Western economy or for that matter most developed economies. Cheers!
crs223 Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 4 minutes ago, Parsad said: But in this case, there is and bond holders who naturally would be the owners of the remaining assets are also being wiped out How “remaining assets” were there? Who received them instead?
Parsad Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 6 minutes ago, crs223 said: How “remaining assets” were there? Who received them instead? There were $260B in assets on the books...are you suggesting the real estate portfolio was completely wiped out? That $260B in real estate holdings in China are completely worthless? If so, they've got far bigger problems than I even imagined! Cheers!
crs223 Posted February 9, 2024 Posted February 9, 2024 14 hours ago, formthirteen said: I will definitely assume 99% of profits from BABA will not reach foreign investors According to yahoo finance, BABA is paying out 18% of earnings as a dividend (1/5.44)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now