doughishere

Maybe some of the lawyers should enter those graphs into the record. The email is truthful, no?

Belgian guys just dont have any luck.

Zing!

he included amortization tables also i was impressed.

We live in a brave new word, merk. Why shouldn't they be doing this, just curious? Because ex parte communications like this run the possibility of prejudicing the case, leading to dismissals of cases, might get judges involuntarily recused from the case... Do I really need to go on? My apologies. I dont spend a lot of time in litigation and law. This is my first real experience in such things.

We live in a brave new word, merk. Why shouldn't they be doing this, just curious?

Gselinks.com

No argument here. Assuming a win for the plaintiff....are there more ramifications outside of just who gets the money? Apparently Im not the only one who thinks there's ramifications outside of the who gets the money. https://www.dropbox.com/s/wxpdjrsr8uqy6l7/Complaint%20of%20DoJ%20Attorneys%20%28Doc%201618181%29.pdf

Damn, thats cold.

Agreed, History was my strongest subject in HS and I enjoyed it because it provides a great sense of how we got to where we are.....it just doesn't pay very good. Perhaps, its inevitable that college education and healthcare will follow suit one day.

A person I know did this and was stopped for it. Apparently, this is not even a ticket - it's misdemeanor. Or maybe the cop was just trying to scare them. YMMV. Possibly considered https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reckless_driving ( may depend on the state ). Well thats no fun...i need to get to work. (2) knowingly drives a vehicle and uses an incline in a roadway, such as a railroad crossing, bridge approach, or hill, to cause the vehicle to become airborne. Class A misdemeanor in Illinois. So, about the same as aggravated assault.

+1

Silly Germans.

Sevens a good one

I dont see this as any different than what they do on SNL. Its funny. Relax or youre gonna pop a arterie.

Love him or hate him. This is hilarious. Japanese Donald Trump Commercialトランプ2016

Ill start. A man is sent to prison for the first time. At night, the lights in the cell block are turned off, and his cellmate goes over to the bars and yells, “Number twelve!” The whole cell block breaks out laughing. A few minutes later, somebody else in the cell block yells, “Number four!” Again, the whole cell bloock breaks out laughing. The new guy asks his cellmate what’s going on. “Well,” says the older prisoner, “we’ve all been in this here prison for so long, we all know the same jokes. So we just yell out the number instead of saying the whole joke.” So the new guy walks up to the bars and yells, “Number six!” There was dead silence in the cell block. He asks the older prisoner, “What’s wrong? Why didn’t I get any laughs?” “Well,” said the older man, “sometimes it’s not the joke, but how you tell it.”

Fannie and Freddie?

http://projects.vassar.edu/1896/morganbonds.html I did not know this. Funny how it was the bankers who bailed out America.

Good things happen to those that wait Napier seems to think that Yellen is keeping rates low for the rest of the world. Good interview, I admit it i have a small crush on Napiers ideas at the moment. Part 1 - Part 2 - Managing Spillovers—Striking the Right Balance of Domestic Objectives and External Stability By Christine Lagarde http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2016/061616.htm?hootPostID=b6d1297da8b61cbf7dc92ff01e34298b Tough job for the central bankers...i dont envy the task.

Yeah, I've had the pleasure to talk with him.. I dont think he receives enough credit right now. From his book: "The important impact of all central bank funding on the Us Government is that it was funded by the creation of new liabilities by central bankers and not the liquidation of assets by savers. Thus freed from obligation to fund the Us Government, savers were free to fund anything else they wanted. And at various stages form 1994 to 2015 they seemed capable of funding everything else! However, as the obligations to fund the US Government falls back upon its savers, there will be fewer savings available to fund the private sector." Another interesting excerpt Can it be coincidence that the four years covered in this book -1921, 1932, 1949, 1982 - also marked momentous change in american Society. There was the birth of the consumer society (1921, The birth of big government of free markers (1932), the birth of the military-industrial complex (1049) and the rebirth of free markets (1982).

No argument here. Assuming a win for the plaintiff....are there more ramifications outside of just who gets the money?

Coulden't you also argue that the Treasury was sophisticated market participant? Now they just have buyers remorse. I mean theres no really good way to paint the Treasury conduct?

That explains why these documents weren't already picked up in the first filing and why Hamish Hume said it was a bit complicated as to why they didn't have the documents referenced in their initial briefs. Whose in control of this ship?

Anyone read this one? I think its more of a historical book on the markets. Just Starting.