mcliu

It sounds like the media narrative is starting to change. I wonder how long before the a 10x rise energy prices dips Europe into a recession. Politicians must be doing their math, maybe pushing Ukraine for a deal, especially given the uncertain political situation in many EU countries. I guess US is a beneficiary as manufacturing becomes more competitive vs Europe given the far lower energy prices. Not surprisingly Europe is getting cold feet on more Russian sanctions while US pushes on. LOL that timing

Russian demands: https://www.reuters.com/world/kremlin-says-russian-military-action-will-stop-moment-if-ukraine-meets-2022-03-07/ 1) Neutrality 2) Crimea 3) Donetsk & Luhansk Will Ukraine take the deal?

Why is that? I thought the 2015 crash was due to US production growth?

Can someone please explain the logic of cancelling Keystone but trying to increase Venezuela & Iran production?

I think it's way too early to know the end game. Many ways this can play out, probably in ways we can't even imagine.

It’s unfortunate NATO keeps sending weapons to Ukraine knowing it’ll become a meat grinder as Russia reverts back to more traditional military doctrine, especially when a guarantee of Ukraine neutrality might have prevented war. The unintended consequence of sanctions might be high inflation driving Europe into a recession causing existing govts to fall in upcoming elections. Ironically, Putin might outlast the elected officials currently in charge of certain European/NATO countries.

It's not conclusive that if Putin is going, he'll be replaced by a pro-West democratic govt. Isn't there possibility that someone even worse comes along? This is the way.

This showed up on my YouTube. Not sure if this is fake news, but Ukraine uses actual neo-nazi units in their military? What the actual fuck?

The problem with following the war on Twitter is that you only get one side's perspective and end up with the impression that Ukrainian troops are ready to roll through Moscow. I think these sources/summaries provide a better but still murky picture of the situation: https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-march-3 While Russian military has not been as effective as expected and has met some supply and strategic/intelligence issues. The overall picture shows that they're pushing effectively into Ukraine, especially along the southern axis. Ukrainian resistance has outperformed expectations using advanced NATO weapons & training, but keep in mind it's only been 7 days in a country of 40+ million with 1.5x size of Iraq. US+allied forces took over a month to conquer Iraq with a far superior force.

Thanks for sharing! Btw, does anyone know why WB didn't mention DaVita & Verisign as one of the top 15 holdings in his annual letter? Did they sell out?

Thanks. Are you saying the shortage is from US shifting trade to Taiwan from China? Btw, what do you think of China's plans to become self-reliant on semi? Any chance of success or is it just too difficult since you need global scale/equipment?

Is it geopolitical change or mainly because of the pandemic driven computing boom and semi shortage? The 2 largest weights are Foxconn and TSMC. Price performance from 2011-March 2020 is ~30%.

Another perspective, would a closed-end fund trade at NAV if it had an all-star manager with an excellent LT track record and ability to generate above market returns while taking on little risk and employing negative-interest-rate leverage?

Thanks. That's an accurate take. I think Taiwan's stagnation also coincides with China's rise. Taiwan became a much less attractive investment for foreigners & even locals. I think despite economic integration, younger Taiwanese seem less politically aligned with the one-China position than their parents, which is reflected in election results, frequent DPP wins over KMT. Overall I agree, integration is inevitable, hopefully peaceful, but there is risk of a confrontation. Timing is uncertain.

Western hypocrisy. The US has done plenty of sketchy shit and killed a ton of civilians (probably more than Russia in the last 20 years) but so far no sanctions, no flight cancellation, no global condemnation and no asset freezes/seizure of US leadership. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians

Another big difference is that Ukraine is a recognized sovereign nation. Taiwan is not. All the major world powers recognize Taiwan as a province of China. Which is why I think the probability of US intervention is very low. I think Chinese planners would also actively try to create a scenario where the cost/benefits analysis for the US would skew toward non-intervention.

Obviously not comparing Afghanistan to Taiwan. My point is military superiority does not guarantee success in a conflict. Nobody is doubting US military superiority over the next 10/20 years. But China does not need to surpass the US in order to take Taiwan. Keep in mind, only 14 countries recognize Taiwan as sovereign. If anything, Japanese/US intervention will be seen as an invasion by the China & allies. Especially given Japan's reputation in Asia. The fact is that the amount of damage China's military can inflict is increasing rapidly. Don't think anyone will argue this. And I think as China's military capabilities increase, the probability of US or Japan intervention decreases. Probability of Japanese unilateral intervention to defend Taiwan without US is 0.

Yeah sure, all that tech did wonders in Afghanistan. Weaponry & tech doesn't do much good if there's no will to fight and no logistics to support it. You have to keep in mind, China is taking Taiwan, not trying to defeat the US. The carriers don't need to be nuclear since it's not meant to project power globally. The US has about 500 F-22/35, but it's deployed all over the world & needs a ton of support/logistics. How many can it really field to defend Taiwan? China has 150 J-20 stealth fighters & producing more. That's how things stand now, the gap will be even closer to the US and far superior than Taiwan in 10/15 years.

The gap between US and China is getting smaller and closing quickly. China's technological & industrial capacity is growing quickly and compounding. Taiwanese forces have not had real combat experience since being defeated by the communists. And unlike Ukraine invasion, PLA troops would be highly motivated due to belief in 1 china and liberation. Logistics might be more of a nightmare for the US fleet than PLA crossing the strait. Plus, realistically, how many casualties will the US tolerate to support Taiwan? This is why I think US will not be involved in a conflict. Unless US uses the nuclear card.

In the short-term it is hard to say, but in the long-term it's almost inevitable China will unify Taiwan either through force or diplomacy.

Question about crypto. Blockchain tech seems very interesting, but how do we know it's not in the dot-com phase where even if it'll be valuable, the impact won't be felt for another 20 years? Also, for the experts, is there a Versign equivalent company/coin in the crypto space that's worth investing in? Thanks!

It's also possible that having fewer ads & better optimized ads might generate more revenue through more users & engagement.

Is there a way to turn off the full page mobile ad? That’s the one that’s quite annoying, I think everything else is pretty fair game.

lol I wonder what the "market cap" of beanie babies was at the peak.