indythinker85 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20131106-907733.html?dsk=y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obtuse_investor Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I am not enthused about this development. Does the board think that this is: A) an opportunistic sale of stock that management believes is trading above intrinsic value? B) an attempt to bolster the balance sheet as hedges and blackberry deal eat into holding company cash reserves? C) Both of the above. D) Something else entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekbaylee Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hmm... not sure we'll get a dividend in January... ::) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekbaylee Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I am not enthused about this development. Does the board think that this is: A) an opportunistic sale of stock that management believes is trading above intrinsic value? B) an attempt to bolster the balance sheet as hedges and blackberry deal eat into holding company cash reserves? C) Both of the above. D) Something else entirely. Would say it's B... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharperDingaan Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Given the size, the price, & the fact that they could have easily issued low cost debt instead ... most would expect that there is more to come. SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer16 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Could this be to finance the Blackberry debt? Packer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkbabang Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I am not enthused about this development. Does the board think that this is: A) an opportunistic sale of stock that management believes is trading above intrinsic value? B) an attempt to bolster the balance sheet as hedges and blackberry deal eat into holding company cash reserves? C) Both of the above. D) Something else entirely. B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekbaylee Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Could this be to finance the Blackberry debt? Packer Looks like it is. Prem has repeated numerous times that he wanted to keep at least $1 B in cash. With his new "investment" in BB and the hedges not "cooperating", he would have found himself below his own threshold and the rating agencies could have downgraded FFH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharperDingaan Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hopefully just another book of business in a field that they actually know something about; but the meter is running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StubbleJumper Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Great. Prem fell in love with RIM and can't get out, so now he must dilute existing shareholders while he tries to extract himself from this tar-baby. It's one thing to put another $250m at risk for the debs, but subsequent dilution is brutal. SJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcliu Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I wonder how the underwriters will sell this stuff now that share prices are below the bought deal.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A_Hamilton Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I wonder how the underwriters will sell this stuff now that share prices are below the bought deal.. Gross proceeds of CAD $431 million. You don't know what fees they are getting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekbaylee Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Although I give Prem a 50-50 chance of winning the BB fight, I find almost funny that every time we think we've seen the worst or got out of the woods "something" comes and knocks FFH down again. Is there any insurance coverage against these "events" - LOL! Seriously, we've seen them all : from TIG to ABH to FBK to the hedges (although this one can still pan out) to BB. Prem, my friend, your faithful shareholders are tired of this bumpy ride. They want a smooth ride, at least for a while, whilst they mend their sore butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giofranchi Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 A lot of bad news these days... :( giofranchi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest valueInv Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I am not enthused about this development. Does the board think that this is: A) an opportunistic sale of stock that management believes is trading above intrinsic value? B) an attempt to bolster the balance sheet as hedges and blackberry deal eat into holding company cash reserves? C) Both of the above. D) Something else entirely. Would say it's B... If the RIM investment is such a small part of their portfolio, why do they need to raise cash? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nestorius Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I wonder how the underwriters will sell this stuff now that share prices are below the bought deal.. Gross proceeds of CAD $431 million. You don't know what fees they are getting... A single institution is purchasing 30% of the $431mm (presumably at the $431/share), so only 700,000 shares to be sold to the public where the brokers are actually taking price risk. On the public tranche there is a 4.0% fee, and on the committed inst'l tranche there is a 1.0% fee. So total fees between the two tranches will be $13.4m, or roughly $19/share of fees on the public risk tranche. So the brokers' "cash breakeven" price on the shares is around $412/share. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txitxo Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 A lot of bad news these days... :( giofranchi And there may be more to come...One of the reasons why Prem Watsa may want to raise cash now is because he sees something very bad coming down the road...remember that practically all the statistical indicators for the US stock market say that there is a high risk of crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txlaw Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Hey, at least they're selling shares at fair value -- maybe even at an overvalued price? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wellmont Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 And there may be more to come...One of the reasons why Prem Watsa may want to raise cash now is because he sees something very bad coming down the road...remember that practically all the statistical indicators for the US stock market say that there is a high risk of crash. he sees something? lol. the whole discussion the last few days has been about how he missed 4 years of bull market. he has been seeing something "very bad" for 4 years now. Did we not learn anything from this entire discussion? He's raising cash because he is investing in bbry. And there is no statistical indicator for US market that says there is a high risk of a crash. none. oh and one last thing. There is no deflation. Inflation is baked into our system. ps: perspective from a non owner: some of the fairfax shareholders are a "wimpy" bunch and are Short Term investors. pw is not going to give you a smooth ride. but he will get you to your "destination" in style. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
txitxo Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 And there is no statistical indicator for US market that says there is a high risk of a crash. Wellmont, I was slowly selling my FFH position (bought at an average of ~370$) because I want to buy European stocks, which are incredibly cheap. So I don't plan to be a FFH long-term holder. All this business with BBRY is a short-term bummer, but it doesn't change at all my opinion about Prem Watsa. Like I said in a previous message, if you do cigar-butt investing, a significant fraction of the companies will tank. It is unavoidable, and the focus should be about having good average returns over the long term. And he has amazing numbers in the long term. Regarding PM macro bets, and statistical indicators, we have talked here many times about the Shiller CAPE, which stands at 24.4 now, almost 50% higher than the historical average, and a total market cap /GDP, which at 113% is at the same level it was in 2007. You could also have a look at the margin debt levels, almost at historical maxima, or the Q-ratio of Spitznagel. Fed or no Fed, there is going to be a very nasty crash in the US, probably similar or perhaps worse than the last one. But we don't know when it is going to happen, whether this year, or the next, or the one after that. And therefore people who warn about it may still look like idiots for some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wellmont Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 right I agree 100%. Nobody knows when it is going to happen. That makes it Unpredictable. Right? So those "indicators" are useless as predictors of market crashes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 50centdollars Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 http://seekingalpha.com/article/1811662-fairfax-financial-holdings-limited-the-investment-philosophy-of-prem-watsa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekbaylee Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 he sees something? lol. the whole discussion the last few days has been about how he missed 4 years of bull market. he has been seeing something "very bad" for 4 years now. Did we not learn anything from this entire discussion? He's raising cash because he is investing in bbry. And there is no statistical indicator for US market that says there is a high risk of a crash. none. oh and one last thing. There is no deflation. Inflation is baked into our system. ps: perspective from a non owner: some of the fairfax shareholders are a "wimpy" bunch and are Short Term investors. pw is not going to give you a smooth ride. but he will get you to your "destination" in style. :) Kind words. What a true gentleman! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wellmont Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 he sees something? lol. the whole discussion the last few days has been about how he missed 4 years of bull market. he has been seeing something "very bad" for 4 years now. Did we not learn anything from this entire discussion? He's raising cash because he is investing in bbry. And there is no statistical indicator for US market that says there is a high risk of a crash. none. oh and one last thing. There is no deflation. Inflation is baked into our system. ps: perspective from a non owner: some of the fairfax shareholders are a "wimpy" bunch and are Short Term investors. pw is not going to give you a smooth ride. but he will get you to your "destination" in style. :) Kind words. What a true gentleman! Did you say this to Parsad? Because he was actually way more critical of wimpy ff shareholders than I was. My guess is....no. You thought you found an "easier" target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alekbaylee Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 he sees something? lol. the whole discussion the last few days has been about how he missed 4 years of bull market. he has been seeing something "very bad" for 4 years now. Did we not learn anything from this entire discussion? He's raising cash because he is investing in bbry. And there is no statistical indicator for US market that says there is a high risk of a crash. none. oh and one last thing. There is no deflation. Inflation is baked into our system. ps: perspective from a non owner: some of the fairfax shareholders are a "wimpy" bunch and are Short Term investors. pw is not going to give you a smooth ride. but he will get you to your "destination" in style. :) Kind words. What a true gentleman! Did you say this to Parsad? Because he was actually way more critical of wimpy ff shareholders than I was. My guess is....no. You thought you found an "easier" target. I don't think anyone here finds that you're an "easy" target, certainly not me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now