Jump to content

FNMA and FMCC preferreds. In search of the elusive 10 bagger.


Recommended Posts

Posted

One question that is now on my head that maybe some of you could provide some light to me. What if steve mnuchin resigns? Other treasury officials can execute or its game over for admin reform. Thanks and gl to all.

  • Replies 17.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

One question that is now on my head that maybe some of you could provide some light to me. What if steve mnuchin resigns? Other treasury officials can execute or its game over for admin reform. Thanks and gl to all.

 

I assume you saw Gasparino float this on Twitter last night. I don't think anyone here knows for sure what would happen to PSPA amendment, but the odds that it occurs clearly plummet if Mnuchin is no longer Secretary, whatever the reason.

 

Mnuchin was kind enough to put us at ease overnight (https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-calls-rampage-in-dc-disgraceful-doesnt-mention-trump/):

 

"Mnuchin indicated that he would not be resigning from his position in light of the attack on the Capitol, as Deputy National Security Adviser Matt Pottinger did Wednesday.

 

“I look forward to getting back to Washington, DC, with our continued work on the transition,” he said.

Posted

One question that is now on my head that maybe some of you could provide some light to me. What if steve mnuchin resigns? Other treasury officials can execute or its game over for admin reform. Thanks and gl to all.

 

I assume you saw Gasparino float this on Twitter last night. I don't think anyone here knows for sure what would happen to PSPA amendment, but the odds that it occurs clearly plummet if Mnuchin is no longer Secretary, whatever the reason.

 

Mnuchin was kind enough to put us at ease overnight (https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-calls-rampage-in-dc-disgraceful-doesnt-mention-trump/):

 

"Mnuchin indicated that he would not be resigning from his position in light of the attack on the Capitol, as Deputy National Security Adviser Matt Pottinger did Wednesday.

 

“I look forward to getting back to Washington, DC, with our continued work on the transition,” he said.

 

Yes saw that and was pretty scared. Having heard that comment back to 13 days left to act.

Posted

You guys should follow Michael Kao.  Smart guy.

Re: Fannie/Freddie-Day 2 of Shot Clock. Let’s keep things in perspective. It’s only Day 2 of the real shot clock. Tons of reasons why thesis makes sense; SCOTUS backstop if not. Silly to think SM resigns. #HODLTilYouYodel

Posted

I don’t really follow FNMA and FMCC, but with the attempted coup/riots in the Capitol building, I doubt SM or anyone else in the Trump administration would do anything policy-wise to make the news.  Just my thought, I could be wrong. 

Posted

I'd add that rather than fearing Mnuchin resigning, we should worry that the orange-faced nutcase hears that some members of his cabinet are discussing invoking the 25th, and he fires them all out of fear/panic/spite/vengeance/...

 

Sadly, given everything that's come from that man over the last four years, writing this is not even shocking or feels outlandish any more (and I'm on that side of the political spectrum).

 

Posted

I don’t really follow FNMA and FMCC, but with the attempted coup/riots in the Capitol building, I doubt SM or anyone else in the Trump administration would do anything policy-wise to make the news.  Just my thought, I could be wrong.

 

I'm trying really hard to not add to my position here, but you're making it very difficult.

Posted

My understanding is that PSPA changes cannot just be reversed two weeks later.  It's an agreement between the TSY/GSEs/FHFA.

 

You need both TSY and FHFA as conservator to agree to change it back.  That would likely require a confirmed Calabria replacement.

 

Is there a way to easily confirm this? I am still holding and thinking about what if scenarios on what Yellen will do and what her plan is once she is in office IF SM doesn’t do what we think he’ll do. We have been disappointed many times so if SM does something it’ll be an exception to the norm.

 

Just be careful what you post here, it’s a stressful time for those holdings.

Posted

I don’t really follow FNMA and FMCC, but with the attempted coup/riots in the Capitol building, I doubt SM or anyone else in the Trump administration would do anything policy-wise to make the news.  Just my thought, I could be wrong.

 

What value does this add? Unless you have skin in the game this type of post spams the board that includes incredible analysis by Midas, Luke, Chris, etc. No disrespect, but 4th quarter dunking adds nothing to the group.

Posted

I don’t really follow FNMA and FMCC, but with the attempted coup/riots in the Capitol building, I doubt SM or anyone else in the Trump administration would do anything policy-wise to make the news.  Just my thought, I could be wrong.

 

What value does this add? Unless you have skin in the game this type of post spams the board that includes incredible analysis by Midas, Luke, Chris, etc. No disrespect, but 4th quarter dunking adds nothing to the group.

 

What?  Are only bulls allowed to post here?  I was clear about the fact that I don’t know anything, but had an opinion on politics.  I thought that acknowledgement would be a positive seeing as the goal is to make money and I’m revealing what you should trust (and not trust) me on.  I can see how this post can seem like taunting if everyone recognized that Trump is likely not going to do anything, but the post right before mine was someone tweeting about how something would happen in the next 14 days.  I’m not trying to dunk on anyone, I just follow this thread occasionally and can’t understand why people are still so optimistic after all this.  I’m trying to add some information so we can all make money which was why I disclosed that I didn’t understand the stock situation so well.  In fact I was even long the prefs for some time so it’s not like I have a bias opposed to the prefs paying out.  You don’t have to listen to me, I’m just trying to push back on, in my opinion, unfounded optimism based on past political events and save everyone some money.  I didn’t understand the need from you and SnarkyPuppy for the frankly ridiculously defensive responses. 

Posted

I don’t really follow FNMA and FMCC, but with the attempted coup/riots in the Capitol building, I doubt SM or anyone else in the Trump administration would do anything policy-wise to make the news.  Just my thought, I could be wrong.

 

What value does this add? Unless you have skin in the game this type of post spams the board that includes incredible analysis by Midas, Luke, Chris, etc. No disrespect, but 4th quarter dunking adds nothing to the group.

 

It does add value. He is making the right judgement call here. Mick Mulvaney just resigned.

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/07/mick-mulvaney-resigns-from-trump-administration-expects-others-to-follow.html

Guest cherzeca
Posted

I get it, GSEs have a large political component, and adding one's two cents on the political gloss is not OT, but this investment has been >50% a legal special event, and to preface remarks by saying that the lawsuits have gone nowhere is basically like holding up a sign saying I dont know what I dont know...

Posted

I don’t really follow FNMA and FMCC, but with the attempted coup/riots in the Capitol building, I doubt SM or anyone else in the Trump administration would do anything policy-wise to make the news.  Just my thought, I could be wrong.

 

What value does this add? Unless you have skin in the game this type of post spams the board that includes incredible analysis by Midas, Luke, Chris, etc. No disrespect, but 4th quarter dunking adds nothing to the group.

 

It does add value. He is making the right judgement call here. Mick Mulvaney just resigned.

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/07/mick-mulvaney-resigns-from-trump-administration-expects-others-to-follow.html

 

Okay- Mnuchin said he will remain. So I added value too. This is politics related, wrong forum.

Posted

I added more. If there ever was a better time to add more its after a ~40% drop from highs a month ago with 9 business days to go!

 

What I do find interesting is the higher div and lower div preferred seem to be coming together a bit in price. Whatever is coming it seems the market believes divs may not matter as much for whatever reason.

 

All of these securities are trading like an option that expires on Jan 21st. When Mnuchin signs the 4th amendment the expiration date goes out to eternity and the time value embedded will soar. Not a bad idea to add a little each day going forward until its signed.

Posted

My understanding is that PSPA changes cannot just be reversed two weeks later.  It's an agreement between the TSY/GSEs/FHFA.

 

You need both TSY and FHFA as conservator to agree to change it back.  That would likely require a confirmed Calabria replacement.

 

Is there a way to easily confirm this? I am still holding and thinking about what if scenarios on what Yellen will do and what her plan is once she is in office IF SM doesn’t do what we think he’ll do. We have been disappointed many times so if SM does something it’ll be an exception to the norm.

 

Just be careful what you post here, it’s a stressful time for those holdings.

 

Per HERA once treasury is out of the picture with another amendment Treasury is out. There is some language that Treasury has to  agree for the GSEs to be released also. The Consent Decree is an agreement between FHFA and the GSEs and Yellen will have no power or input at that point.

Posted

I get it, GSEs have a large political component, and adding one's two cents on the political gloss is not OT, but this investment has been >50% a legal special event, and to preface remarks by saying that the lawsuits have gone nowhere is basically like holding up a sign saying I dont know what I dont know...

 

Maybe you are misunderstanding, again I don’t know the intricacies of this case, but I was responding to the conversation about handicapping admin reform from SM over the next 14 days which was being discussed right before I posted. 

Posted

Ive added about 20% across the board to FNMAS, FMCCL, FNMAH today. Albeit small allocation. But market neutral/event driven and both sentiment and expectations are pretty rotten right now. Yea, sometimes I just like to take the other side of a trade.

Guest cherzeca
Posted

I get it, GSEs have a large political component, and adding one's two cents on the political gloss is not OT, but this investment has been >50% a legal special event, and to preface remarks by saying that the lawsuits have gone nowhere is basically like holding up a sign saying I dont know what I dont know...

 

Maybe you are misunderstanding, again I don’t know the intricacies of this case, but I was responding to the conversation about handicapping admin reform from SM over the next 14 days which was being discussed right before I posted.

 

our posts were simultaneous, I really wasn't responding to you.  if this investment were just a roulette spin, then I would have less objection to the commentary that assumes it is

Posted

I get it, GSEs have a large political component, and adding one's two cents on the political gloss is not OT, but this investment has been >50% a legal special event, and to preface remarks by saying that the lawsuits have gone nowhere is basically like holding up a sign saying I dont know what I dont know...

 

Maybe you are misunderstanding, again I don’t know the intricacies of this case, but I was responding to the conversation about handicapping admin reform from SM over the next 14 days which was being discussed right before I posted.

 

our posts were simultaneous, I really wasn't responding to you.  if this investment were just a roulette spin, then I would have less objection to the commentary that assumes it is

 

Oh ok my fault. 

Posted

I think all opinions and offerings should be welcome but also all of them should be subject to ridicule and getting shit on. That keeps things honest.

 

My 2c hasn't changed really. But taking a step back this investment was started in the early party of the decade under the Obama administration and there were a couple avenues, but it was largely a legal battle. Trump came in and it was OMG he/Mnuchin is gonna fix it, but the under appreciated aspect today vs 4 years ago is you have 4 years worth of legal time value now on your side.

 

Theres good likelihood the journey on the legal front is nearing an end, and this ascribes no value to an executive order type of move. Its similar to the SPAC warrant which does have an expiration date, and if things dont roll your way its worth zero, but in any event, contrary to conventional wisdom, it should and usually is worth more the closer it gets to expiration.

Posted

Often has been the case when sentiment has gotten this negative (usually due to price decline) the right move was to buy, even for just a trade.  This investment was never just contingent on mnuchin so the price is an opportunity if you still believe in SCOTUS

Posted

I added more. If there ever was a better time to add more its after a ~40% drop from highs a month ago with 9 business days to go!

 

What I do find interesting is the higher div and lower div preferred seem to be coming together a bit in price. Whatever is coming it seems the market believes divs may not matter as much for whatever reason.

 

All of these securities are trading like an option that expires on Jan 21st. When Mnuchin signs the 4th amendment the expiration date goes out to eternity and the time value embedded will soar. Not a bad idea to add a little each day going forward until its signed.

 

I added again today as well.  I've been noticing the same thing re yields. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...