Blake Hampton Posted Saturday at 09:54 PM Posted Saturday at 09:54 PM 2 minutes ago, cubsfan said: We call that progress Blake! LOL Strong journalism makes an effort to eliminate bias in its reporting. If it's full of opinions, it ain't news. CNBC I think finds a good balance between its co-anchors. Cubs, I wish that you would find a way to consume better journalism. Read The Economist or the WSJ. It would be good for you.
Munger_Disciple Posted Saturday at 09:54 PM Posted Saturday at 09:54 PM (edited) I thought Joe's behavior in that interview was disgraceful. It's fine to ask a guest tough questions on TV but he should treat them with respect. Grantham might have called more bubbles than there were actual ones but he has a very decent long term track record and seems like a good human being from what I know publicly. Edited Saturday at 10:06 PM by Munger_Disciple
Spekulatius Posted Saturday at 09:56 PM Posted Saturday at 09:56 PM 17 hours ago, NnnnotSoSmart said: Grantham is certainly a nut job. His crazy and glaringly unscientific obsession with "climate change" is evidence of it. A Grantham quote from an interview in 2022: "It strikes me as utterly trivial and only producible by economists. [...] The guy who got the Nobel Prize for it [William Nordhaus], for his work on climate change — actually he spelled it out. He said, 'Even if there was 10 degrees centigrade, it would only cost something in the range of 10 percent of GDP.' To which I say, 'Dudes, we will be long gone as a species at 10 degrees centigrade.' It is quite obvious at 1.1 [°C] that we are already having trouble. At 2, we will be struggling and societies will fail here, there, and everywhere. At 3, in a sense, forget about it [...] At 10 degrees . . . You cannot find a serious climate scientist who would bet that society, as we know it on a global basis, will still be around at 5 degrees centigrade. I have met a lot of them, and I ask them this question. Not one thinks we have any material chance of a stable society at 5 degrees centigrade." https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/jeremy-grantham/ In a 2012 Nature commentary, he urged climate scientists: "Be persuasive. Be brave. Be arrested if necessary. This is not only the crisis of your lives — it is also the crisis of our species' existence." He argued understatement is more dangerous than overstatement for this issue. https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2012/11/financier-jeremy-granthams-be-brave-advice-to-climate-scientists/ He is not wrong. A 10 Deg C increase in temperature results in our world looking more like Mad Max.
Blake Hampton Posted Saturday at 09:57 PM Posted Saturday at 09:57 PM 1 minute ago, Munger_Disciple said: I thought Joe's behavior in that interview was disgraceful. It's fine to ask a guest tough questions on TV but he should treat them with the respect. Grantham might have called more bubbles than there were actual ones but he has a very decent long term track record and seems like a good human being from what I know publicly. Look at your president. I believe we are past the point of worrying about the outbursts of news anchors unfortunately.
matthew2129 Posted Saturday at 10:27 PM Posted Saturday at 10:27 PM The only thing more comically wrong then his bear/short calls are his long calls. Bro was a China bull in 2020/2021
Blake Hampton Posted Saturday at 10:32 PM Posted Saturday at 10:32 PM (edited) I think economic calamity is certain. I believe we will soon see the greatest financial crisis in human history: frozen credit, collapsing asset markets, desperate money printing in order to save us from it, and finally extreme inflation as that newly created money ultimately reaches the real economy. I often fear a complete currency collapse. Our country is running historic deficits during full employment. Our last two recessions both nearly led to economic collapse. We have an erratic leader, a broken Congress, and an apathetic public that has completely checked out. Our currency sits at the center of the global financial system. And never before in history have we seen trade imbalances of the size they are today. And the worst part is that no one cares. We're all just sitting here waiting to see how far faith alone can take us. But maybe Trump will save us. He likes to paint himself as a god and has convinced the MAGA crowd that his record of failure will somehow lead to solving our greatest problems. I am doubtful. Edited Saturday at 10:37 PM by Blake Hampton
Blake Hampton Posted Saturday at 10:33 PM Posted Saturday at 10:33 PM (edited) It feels almost obvious to me, and it makes me feel crazy that seemingly no one else sees it. Maybe I am. Edited Saturday at 10:34 PM by Blake Hampton
matthew2129 Posted Saturday at 10:40 PM Posted Saturday at 10:40 PM 7 minutes ago, Blake Hampton said: .. and finally extreme inflation as that newly created money ultimately reaches the real economy Sounds bullish for stocks tbh lol
Blake Hampton Posted Saturday at 10:46 PM Posted Saturday at 10:46 PM 3 minutes ago, matthew2129 said: Sounds bullish for stocks tbh lol How Inflation Swindles the Equity Investor: Warren Buffett, May 1977 I actually have the original Fortune issue sitting on my shelf. I've probably read it 10 or 20 times.
cubsfan Posted Saturday at 11:05 PM Posted Saturday at 11:05 PM 1 hour ago, Blake Hampton said: Strong journalism makes an effort to eliminate bias in its reporting. If it's full of opinions, it ain't news. CNBC I think finds a good balance between its co-anchors. Cubs, I wish that you would find a way to consume better journalism. Read The Economist or the WSJ. It would be good for you. I have not watched CNBC for years, after years of watching it. From occasional clips I see - looks like somewhat balanced with Kernan being conservative and Sorkin plenty left. I'll take your word for it.
Jay Rent Posted yesterday at 01:19 AM Posted yesterday at 01:19 AM Blake - In 1977, Microsoft had $380K in revenue and 9 employees. Apple innovated with the Apple 2 computer. In 1978 my parents overpaid for the house we grew up in with a 9.75% mortgage rate. All survived inflation. Never does Buffett say bet against the US. Pockets of the market, economy and politics will always be scary but stay the course and you will come out for the better. Grantham, Katsenelson (financial marketers) were saying in 2022 (when inflation first became a concern) that markets could not possible grow more after the first rebound (of course they were also pushing further market disasters at the bottom). Look at earnings on the SP since (not just market returns)
Red Lion Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 5 hours ago, Blake Hampton said: I think economic calamity is certain. I believe we will soon see the greatest financial crisis in human history: frozen credit, collapsing asset markets, desperate money printing in order to save us from it, and finally extreme inflation as that newly created money ultimately reaches the real economy. I often fear a complete currency collapse. Don’t you hold cash/t-bills? Or am I mistaking you with another poster?
John Hjorth Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 15 hours ago, Sinbius said: Not sure I would call someone that had donated already half on his net worth toward environmental causes (and has in program to donate something like 95%) a piece of $hit... And I would stop blaming people giving bad advice...and start accounting people for their own decision in their own finance... And if you think about it...for the people that do not get that is bad advice...it is actually good advice ...it is not that everybody should invest... Yeah, @Sinbius, Here at CofB&F, we are a bunch, a community, of individual DIY investors, that do our very best to steer clear of the costs related to the involvement of the institutional imperative, and we all know it's not in our power to save world from it. But we can actually still make a difference, a material difference for others than our selves, for some near and dear to us. Keeping the bulwark up, intact and running some times calls for, requires mentally venting to decompress, which is what I think Greg [ @Gregmal ] did here by starting this topic.
CorpRaider Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago He's right. IDK why no one can understand nuance anymore. He punches it up but all he's been saying with a few short exceptions is that it's risky so adjust your allocation to ex US, tilt value, and some other assets consistent with your plan/risk perimeters. Kernen has been a clown since at least the 90s.
Lazarus Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 6/27/2026 at 6:32 PM, Blake Hampton said: I think economic calamity is certain. I believe we will soon see the greatest financial crisis in human history: frozen credit, collapsing asset markets, desperate money printing in order to save us from it, and finally extreme inflation as that newly created money ultimately reaches the real economy. I often fear a complete currency collapse. I'm now convinced that Blake is simply trolling the forum, posting nonsense and laughing as people respond seriously to try to set him straight. But you went too far with this one. Bravo... fooled me for a long time.
Xerxes Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago On 6/27/2026 at 5:54 PM, Blake Hampton said: Strong journalism makes an effort to eliminate bias in its reporting. If it's full of opinions, it ain't news. CNBC I think finds a good balance between its co-anchors. Cubs, I wish that you would find a way to consume better journalism. Read The Economist or the WSJ. It would be good for you. Nothing wrong with CNBC itself, even the mighty Buffett watches it in the background with mute on. I usually run Bloomberg TV on low volume when I work from home. So there is value in them. But think of them as distribution channels rather than content creators. For instance CNBC has 98% market share of anything Berkshire. Great content through the same exact pipeline that also bring Lousy Joe from Squawkpod. There are however key differences between CNBC and Bloomberg. The former caters to domestic business news while the latter caters to international/global news. You can watch Bloomberg TV at 2 AM and it will be aired via HK. On newspaper side, WSJ caters to domestic business news while FT/The Economist cater to global news. So I don’t see this as CNBC fault or a MAGA thing. This is just Joe acting like a child. That kind of behaviour is unacceptable.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now