Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, changegonnacome said:

 

with EU allies like Zelensky - who needs enemies?...blowing up a key energy conduit into Europe precipitating an energy crisis and now effectively condemning a generation of European energy intensive industry offshore to the USA or Asia is quite the neighborly thing to do......especially to an economic trading bloc your eager to join!

 

Reminds me a bit of Bibi.....who's seems quite happy to pull forward a regional conflict in the Middle East where the USA is gonna be forced to commit extraordinary resources in a war they have no interest in starting.

 

Sometimes in the alliances......the tail starts wagging the dog......if the dog isnt careful to remind the tail who's the boss sometimes!


I draw a distinction between Z and B. 

 

it is not news to this forum, of what I think of B. He and his cronies and their Hamas counterparts are nothing but first class racist a-holes. 
 

B is desperate to remain PM but appears to have a strong hold on the US Congress. My view of B pre-dates 10/07. 
 

That said on Z, I have nothing but admiration. He has his issues, but he gets a pass from me. 
 

What they do have in common is that both of their countries were savagely attacked. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Xerxes said:

I draw a distinction between Z and B. 

 

As do I.....I shouldnt have put them in the same paragraph......history will be kind to Zelensky........Bibi.....well....the less said about Bibi the better!

Posted

CIA to Zelensky: We need to tell you that you should not do this wink wink.

 

Zelensky to Zaluzhniy: You should not do this.

 

Zaluzhniy: What if I do it anyway?

 

Zelensky: I’ll make you UK ambassador.

Posted
1 hour ago, Gregmal said:

Yup...remember too all the usual suspect media outlets blaming Putin and demanding more Ukraine aid? Fuckin pieces of shit as always. 

 

As a European CoBF member, I just have to say, I cringe out of embarrasment by reading your post, - for my part, not yours. 

 

Europe as such should naturally be able to stand on its own feet and defend it self against foreign agressors, which it - as a fact - isen't at the moment. [ How lame is that? - It's just such a bad joke.]

 

However the general European sentiment is we will improve on that, but it will take time. Ramping up military spending is big deal involving a lot inertia, based on bureaucrasy and such.

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

Basically, it is al about preserving Western values of life in European societies, which I hope you agree is the right thing to invest in.

Posted
6 minutes ago, John Hjorth said:

 

As a European CoBF member, I just have to say, I cringe out of embarrasment by reading your post, - for my part, not yours. 

 

Europe as such should naturally be able to stand on its own feet and defend it self against foreign agressors, which it - as a fact - isen't at the moment. [ How lame is that? - It's just such a bad joke.]

 

However the general European sentiment is we will improve on that, but it will take time. Ramping up military spending is big deal involving a lot inertia, based on bureaucrasy and such.

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

Basically, it is al about preserving Western values of life in European societies, which I hope you agree is the right thing to invest in.

Depends on the definition of western values. One of those values used to be independent thinking. Now? Not so sure anymore. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Gregmal said:

Depends on the definition of western values. One of those values used to be independent thinking. Now? Not so sure anymore. 

I have a habit of checking the WSJ and Bloomberg. Perhaps I'm more aware or perhaps it's getting more trashy over time but it's just a dumb echo chamber. Constant articles disparaging everything Musk touches because he is media enemy number 1 owning X (he may have made himself easy to not like, but the guys done some awesome stuff for society). Barely any articles are worth opening and are just regurgitations of what someone else said. It's like sell side just chirping management expectations as analysis. Recession incoming! Let's take every company that has a layoff and make it front page and ignore all the hiring taking place at other companies. Inflation going wild! And then Bloomberg is the same articles with a different title. 

Posted
3 hours ago, John Hjorth said:

Thanks, @UK & @Xerxes,

 

I'm  still shocked by reading this. 

 

Not shocked - at all - that Volodymyr Zelenskyy may have signed off on this action and may have supported it on a practical level. Extraordinary times and circumstances may from time to time to require extraordinary measures and may contain an element of Catch-22 and imply Collateral damage.

 

To me, if he has participated in this, he has just done what his people rightfully might have expected of him as their leader and as a patriot. I'm also fine with him not public taking responsibility, when the adversary behaves like in this overall sitiuation. Bullies mostly understand nothing but brute force.

 

I take issue with the Danish and Swedish governments handling of the case, who initiated investigations of what happened back then, only to 'burry' achieved findings and conclusions with a 'confidential' stamp, based on the matters were 'relevant for the safety of the state'.

 

Utter *BS* and hipocrisy in two open democracies.

 

More stinky than fishy - bad odeor all over it.


don’t get too excited, the next big nordstream story will have an entirely new narrative because all of these conspiracy theories have been sourced entirely from shadowy European sources desperate for attention.
 

This one doesn’t make sense on its face. The pipelines were already shut down, and European allies, especially Germany are critical to Ukrainian survival. Let alone the physical difficulties of doing a deep sea demolition from a tiny yacht.

 

As always, I’ll point out there is no compelling evidence that the Nordstream pipelines were blown up by an intentional act of sabotage. Unless you think Gasproms terrible maintenance practices were directed by Ukrainian secret service.

Posted

On a different note - Chicago getting ready for the DNC next week. Friends that are fireman,

ex-marines, etc, getting called up from non-active duty for street patrol and riot duty.

Putting people on rooftops, etc.

 

2 years ago Chicago screaming about defunding the police, today we look like Fallujah.

 

IMG_9091.jpeg.622123156c2d3ab8c6ac510f032b88c9.jpeg

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gregmal said:

This must be where they protect democracy by nominating a candidate who never won a primary. Hoorah Democracy!

Ha …  I’ve been saying this from day one…seems like both parties are 2 sides of the same coin…..both will lie cheat and sell their own mothers to win and accumulate power… Demorats just happen to be a little more subtle  on this issue than the Trumplican mafiosi 

Posted

It's really upsetting to see this in my hometown. 

 

But yeah, they insist on defunding and hamstringing the police, until it's their convention, then they call in reinforcements.

 

 

 

Posted

Well the drunken folks decide to blow the Nordstream pipeline that was already makes sense. why would Zelensky sign off on this? What would this accomplish versus the risk that the truth comes out (which apparently is happening now).

 

There are also articles now about pot. Russian sabotage on German military bases. that makes not sense to me either although they are suspecting other extremism groups as well (free Palestine).

 

None of these things really make too much sense unless you a re deep into drugs but then again a lot of people are.

 

I do watch what happens with the Kursk incursion. Looks like huge victory by Ukraine in many dimensions. First, the Russians were caught napping and were run over and this is now the fist time enemy groups are in Russia since 1944. the economy in 3 large Oblasts is totally disrupted and there is chaos. Putin cannot let this stand and now he is moving his troops and best brigades from Donetz to this new focus point which due to poor Russian logistic takes forever.

 

Its really quite something to watch.

Posted
5 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

Its really quite something to watch.

 

This would be very interesting to watch, especially from the distance far enough:). Except for the fact, that since the start of invasion there is nothing else than a constant escallation, so many red lines are being crossed and still there is no much more clarity today on the final resolution possible, then it was two years ago. Most get used to all this, but seeing British tanks driving in Kursk:), I am not against this per se, but personally I am worried at such times a bit for some unforseen concequences / more escallation.

Posted
11 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

Looks like huge victory by Ukraine in many dimensions.

 

I applaud it - and it warms the blood to see Putin so embarrassed by it.....one can imagine him in a fit of rage in the Kremlin when he heard the news.....but taking a step back.......and thinking about it rationally..........invading completely undefended territory of your enemy hundreds of miles away from the actual battlefield in SE Ukraine............feels like a PR/moral boosting stunt you pull when the 'real' military objective of capturing your own territory back isn't going so well.

 

To do so IMO is an admission that, fundamentally, the reality is setting in that in a conventional war Ukraine hasn't the manpower left now to achieve any traditional military objectives against Russia....i.e. capture back Oblasts lost since 2022.

 

The Kursk invasion - on the surface appears like a military operation......but IMO its a very important pivot to a kind of scaled up version of gorilla warfare by Zelensky....which is an admission by Ukraine that even with all the military aid they've been provided they lack the human resources to make any progress on the actual battlefield in South Eastern Ukraine.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, UK said:

 

This would be very interesting to watch, especially from the distance far enough:). Except for the fact, that since the start of invasion there is nothing else than a constant escallation, so many red lines are being crossed and still there is no much more clarity today on the final resolution possible, then it was two years ago. Most get used to all this, but seeing British tanks driving in Kursk:), I am not against this per se, but personally I am worried at such times a bit for some unforseen concequences / more escallation.

The red lines drawn by Putin are all BS. Putin has crossed more red lines than anyone. The UK has given Ukraine a total of 14 Challenger tanks, more symbolic than anything. It is clear that the west has given Ukraine just enough to survive but not enough to succeed.

 

The Kursk incursion is a tactical maneuver- instead of attacking against fortified lines like they tried last summer, they attacked the weak spot which is ironically the Russian homeland itself. Putin cannot led this stand, he has to fight back. So now Russia fights on Ukraines terms not their own.

 

1) Russia has to take the occupied land back. Losses won’t matter.

2) three oblasts of Russia have  become a war zone, with evacuation, fighting and destruction. The economy in these three oblasts is totally shattered. Putin is advertising in Moscow and all over Russia for civil engineers to create Fortifications all long the frontline deep into the Russian homeland.mits is going to be hugely expensive.

3) Russia has to move many of their best units from the donetz into this area which will take a long time, so hugely disruptive 

4) it’s a public humiliation for Putin.

 

Longer term, I think Russia has to switch their entire economy to a war economy. The GDP growth may not be too bad but what it means is that Russian as a whole will see a decline in goods and services in favor of feeding the military.

 

Edited by Spekulatius
Posted
9 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

The red lines drawn by Putin are all BS. Putin has crossed more red lines than anyone. The UK has given Ukraine a total of 14 Challenger tanks, more symbolic than anything. It is clear that the west has given Ukraine just enough to survive but not enough to succeed.

 

The Kursk incursion is a tactical maneuver- instead of attacking against fortified lines like they tried last summer, they attacked the weak spot which is ironically the Russian homeland itself. Putin cannot led this stand, he has to fight back. So now Russia fights on Ukraines terms not their own.

 

1) Russia has to take the occupied land back. Losses won’t matter.

2) three oblasts of Russia have  become a war zone, with evacuation, fighting and destruction. The economy in these three oblasts is totally shattered. Putin is advertising in Moscow and all over Russia for civil engineers to create Fortifications all long the frontline deep into the Russian homeland.mits is going to be hugely expensive.

3) Russia has to move many of their best units from the donetz into this area which will take a long time, so hugely disruptive 

4) it’s a public humiliation for Putin.

 

Longer term, I think Russia has to switch their entire economy to a war economy. The GDP growth may not be too bad but what it means is that Russian as a whole will see a decline in goods and services in favor of feeding the military.

 

 

Perhaps...anyway, all this is well above my paygrade and, at least for now, it seems that because of Kursk, Russia is moving its troops from Kaliningrad and Saint Petersburg districts to Kursk, not the other way:)

Posted
29 minutes ago, UK said:

Kaliningrad and Saint Petersburg districts to Kursk, not the other way:)


Yep Kursk is an embarrassing annoyance….soon to be reclaimed and where Ukraine will pay a high price in terms of equipment and maybe men.

 

I kind of get it - Zelensky comes from showbiz….and Kursk is showbiz writ large in the theatre of war…it broke through into Western news headlines….and that’s its value….all things equal it might allow Western politicians to send a few billion more of aid with Kursk hung out as a morsel of progress…when in reality no progress is being made at all (at great human and monetary capital) where it matters in South Eastern Ukraine.

Posted
1 hour ago, changegonnacome said:


Yep Kursk is an embarrassing annoyance….soon to be reclaimed and where Ukraine will pay a high price in terms of equipment and maybe men.

 

I kind of get it - Zelensky comes from showbiz….and Kursk is showbiz writ large in the theatre of war…it broke through into Western news headlines….and that’s its value….all things equal it might allow Western politicians to send a few billion more of aid with Kursk hung out as a morsel of progress…when in reality no progress is being made at all (at great human and monetary capital) where it matters in South Eastern Ukraine.


But this is not show business 

 

Both the recent incursion into the thinly protected open swaths of Russia with experienced Ukrainian troops … and its campaign in the Black Sea are means to wage asymmetrical war, because it cannot go head to head against the entrenched positions in the Donbas. 
 

 

Posted

A fairly good piece [in my personal opinion] by Reuters today :

 

Reuters [August 17th 2024] : How Russia looked the wrong way as Ukraine invaded.

 

It's fairly long, written as detailed notes on timeline basis brought together, describing all chaotic elements and events. I like it so, instead of reading the reporters assessments and conclusions.

 

Total chaos in the communication among ranks in the line of command in the Russian military. I'm puzzled one can get away with lying about the actual situation to Putin without getting axed. It reads as total lack of any kind of structure, based on an agreed modus operandi / procedure and followed to the point, with precision. It has incompetence and dishonesty painted all over it.

 

A pitty of military performance, verging to being laughable, I would say. What a disaster.

 

- - - o 0 o - - -

 

Two bridges important for the Russian military supply chain taken out in the Kursk area.

 

 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Xerxes said:

because it cannot go head to head against the entrenched positions in the Donbas. 

 

Agree - think I said somewhere above - that this is now more like Gorilla warfare.....or a counter-insurgency......but what it tells you....Kursk in particular.....is that Ukraine itself knows that it can not be militarily successful in the South East.....it is not winning back that territory..

 

The BIG problem of course......is that the story which precipitated the West's contribution of capital and equipment..........was that Zelensky sold us a story about a counter-offensive that could be mounted of such success that it would bring Russia to the negotiating table begging for an end.....scuttling a few hundred miles North of the battle field....and driving across empty fields into Russia and taking some undefended villages and towns is not the painful and costly to Russia counteroffensive that would bring Putin to the negotiating table that 'we' were hoping and paying for.

Posted

^^^ Right. It's easy to see this is a stalemate, war of attrition - which Ukraine can not win.

Ukraine needs to decide what lands to concede to Putin and sue for peace.

 

It simply can not afford to lose a whole generation of young men - and survive as a nation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...