dwy000

at your age (or what i assume is your age), with a b-school background you're going to be working 70 hours a week at whatever you're doing. With a good chunk of it being face time or make-work to prove your mettle. Hours at a start up will be worse but at least the work will be more diverse (and the pay much worse). If you're going to work 70 hrs a week at something, make it something you at least enjoy doing or that it's providing the benefits to get you where you really want to be. Once you get on the treadmill, it's really hard to walk away from the money despite the dipwads you're working with.

It picks up in the 2nd chapter with the car chase scene

Thank goodness it's back. My wife was looking at me like "why are talking to me about detailed stock analysis?"

Try "On Writing" by Stephen King (yes, that Stephen King). I have no interest in being a writer and only picked this up because somebody gave it to me but I couldn't put it down. Shows what a good writer he is that he could make almost a textbook interesting.

I was really surprised at how much I enjoyed this book. It's part biography and part insider details of the take private transaction back in 2014. I originally bought it thinking it would be a rah-rah, run of the mill biography about how he overcame diversity through hard work and his own greatness, yada yada yada. But I don't think I've read a business biography since Snowball that was staying up late to read and couldn't put down. Dell's back and forth with Carl Icahn is worth the price in itself. He doesn't hold back about his views on Icahn right down to his wife's cooking. I'd heard about his dorm room days starting Dell but I didn't realize how entrepreneurial he was from early teen years and this was despite being raised rich and against his parent's wishes. Anyways, it's a great read and pretty good insight into the person as well. Highly recommend.

Agreed. Actually Healthcare is a decent business too although they had to sell some crown jewels in the biopharm business to Danaher. I wanted the book to go into Alstom better - in hindsight it was a disaster but at the time everyone was calling it a coup. I wanted to understand the rationale for it - esp after selling NBC cheaply. Aviation is an incredible business. There are really only 2-3 credible players so its an oligopoly. Good tailwind (no pun intended) too.

Having worked there and knowing many of the players I was a little disappointed that there wasn't a little more substance to the book. There was a decent amount about culture and Welch and how Immelt operated and his personality (which they nailed). But I wanted to know more about the background to much of the M&A and the troubles in Power that almost brought them down, and the rationale behind the software debacle, etc. These were not dumb people and while the bureaucracy could be overwhelming, there were a lot of really, really smart people and there were a lot of things that were done right. It took a new culture to realize it.

I read this coming out of B-School as a "must read" at the time (along with Liar's Poker). Not only is it simply a great read, whether you're into finance or not, but it's also a good primer on the use of of leverage in business. The most important takeaway for me, however, was to see just how much of the activity was driven by ego and FOMO. Some of the smartest, most experienced investors out there, doing things rational people wouldn't do in order to be deemed a "player" or the king of the hill. It's like Robinhood meme stocks but with LBO's.

A very Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everyone here. I can't think of a website or board where I have learned more or found more opportunity than CoBF - and it's due to the quality and integrity of the posters. Thanks all!

Not a recommendation of a single book but 150 recommendations from business leaders for their favorite book of the year. Some really surprising entries in there and I've added a bunch to my (already too long) reading list. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2021-best-books/?cmpid=BBD121521_CUS&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=211215&utm_campaign=closeamericas

I bought shares of Charter earlier this year and foolishly used my phone instead of walking up to my desk. I put an extra 0 on the number of shares because I was also watching a low priced stock separately. About 10 minutes later i realized I bought 10x the number of shares I intended to. I panicked, ran up to my office and sold the extra shares. Through sheer luck it had ticked up and I made more in that 10 minutes than the whole week. By accident. It confirmed I would never make a good day trader.

I don't want to spoil the ending for you but they don't blow up and Malone does just fine (pretty well in fact).

How bad is it that I saw Netflix was coming out with a movie called Red Notice and my first thought was "The Rock seems to be an odd choice to play Bill Browder"

I liked the book but it really was an ego trip. Zell has had a number of high profile failures along the way but you would never know it from the book. A lot of the business detail was glossed over - I wanted more dirt on the backroom negotiations and aggressive structuring he used but it wasn't there. It's a quick and good read but there are better biographies out there.

Verizon spun out their old landlines to Fairpoint a long time ago using RMT. I remember getting shares in Fairpoint and couldn't blow them out fast enough.

can you frame it a little more? Are you referring to short term movement due to a re-juggling of the shareholder base or are you referring to the long term returns of spinouts in general using this structure?

Just my 2 cents but I would agree with Gregmal. It's highly unlikely newbies will plop down $50 if they can't see what they're buying into. I suspect most people on the board would follow and read for a while before feeling the need to join and respond to a post or comment on a stock. Either way, I'm in to stay whatever is decided.

so much for the great exodus I guess. Record population in NYC with increase in all boroughs. New York City’s Population Booms — But Not for Everyone, Everywhere - THE CITY

Don't drink there yourself. Ever.

Spek that's at least 3 "what are you selling" posts in the past week. Are you sitting on cash or selling to buy something more appealing?

Probably depends on how much you're talking about. If it's small amounts, giving big tips and small donations are meaningful to the recipients and you get much more direct impact. But once you get into the $000's you probably want to make a larger scale, broader impact. If you have the time (which many times is more impactful than straight up $'s) it might be preferable to get involved with a charity or activity that supports a cause you believe in. And once you are involved it's much easier to give funds because you know where its going and can see the impact. It's a win-win for both you and the cause. I must admit I don't understand those who don't take the taxable deduction though. It's basically free money that can increase the amount of the gift if you re-donate the tax savings as well.

Bloomberg has a promo where you pay $1.99/month for 3 months trial period. It includes digital and the weekly magazine! I will likely cancel at the end of it until the next promo because the annual rate is way too high but I'm loving this promo

I have no problem either way but if you put up a paywall, the number of posters (and new registrants) will likely plummet. The value here is from the open exchange.

The higher price for the call generally reflects the present valuing of the strike price at maturity in put/call parity (since buying call and selling put gets the same value as owning the shares without having to fund the upfront cost of buying shares). In a virtually zero interest rate environment and a fairly short time period the difference would be meaningless - especially for a high volatility stock. But Inofeisone is correct that this is all theoretical.

I certainly wouldn't deny that those factors are going on in the market for Tesla options but every option pricing class i ever took (and there were a bunch) was based on the theory that puts and calls should be priced similarly with the only exception being as the stock price approaches zero (since call upside is infinite $ and put upside is capped at a zero stock price). If they aren't trading that way there is (theoretically at least) an arbitrage to be made.