Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, rogermunibond said:

Didn't WEB do something similar with Gen Re.  First buying shares then the whole thing.

 

Berkshire has had stakes in a number of companies they then acquired: GEICO, BNSF, Precision Castparts.

Posted

Fact: In past shareholder letters, WEB wrote that it's easier to buy a reinsurance company than to start one from scratch.

 

Fact: Looking at the balance sheet, the vast majority of its investment assets are in fixed maturities, $106B out of $136B. There is only $14B invested in private equities.

 

Fact: CB's market cap is $106B.

 

Conjecture: Berkshire could be interested in CB's insurance operation. If Berkshire acquired CB at its market cap with cash, Berkshire could liquidate its fixed income portfolio and then invest it in more equities and/or buy other businesses in full.

Posted

These are all wishful thinking, right ? $140B of the cash pile is NOT get used up, no matter how amazing Chubb might be.  
 

That said nothing wrong with a large non-controlling stake. 

Posted (edited)

Yeah, if I had to guess, Berkshire will hold off on elephant hunting until there's blood in the streets, even if a Chubb buyout would work at current prices (or be no more expensive than Alleghany was). Buffett will probably wait for more of a margin safety to deploy that kind of cash. 

 

But, yeah, fun to think about. I wouldn't mind it, really. 

Edited by charlieruane
Posted

Can someone explain these insurance acquisition synergies that Berkshire enjoys? Is Berkshire so overcapitalized that it can acquire similar insurance companies and liquidate their fixed-income portfolios, thereby receiving a huge portion of their acquisition price back? And is this simply because Berkshire knows it has the liquidity/reserves to pay any liabilities/claims over time? 

Posted
7 hours ago, AlwaysDay1 said:

Can someone explain these insurance acquisition synergies that Berkshire enjoys? Is Berkshire so overcapitalized that it can acquire similar insurance companies and liquidate their fixed-income portfolios, thereby receiving a huge portion of their acquisition price back? And is this simply because Berkshire knows it has the liquidity/reserves to pay any liabilities/claims over time? 

 

Have you studied the Berkshire 10-Qs and 10-Ks with regard to information about regulatory dividend restrictions for the insurance companies inside Berkshire, and if you have, what does that tell you?

Posted

Regulators will essentially control the capitalization of the various insurance agencies. That said, Berkshire has in the past been successful taking over insurance books and re-aligning the investment portfolio to "something more Buffett-esque". Regulators generally have allowed it given Berkshire's sterling reputation.

 

The play here as I see it:

1- Buy well functioning insurance companies with significant long-term customer relationships, who have a conservative investment book, at reasonable valuation multiples.

2- Leverage the existing customer relationships and re-align the investment portfolios, perhaps repricing some coverage (thanks, Ajit!)

3- Sit back and sip Coca-Cola 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...