Jump to content

2019 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting


cm2

Recommended Posts

I will be in Omaha May 1 - 5, interested in meeting with professional investors, groups.

 

Would really like to meet Charlie Munger, DJCO meeting was on Valentines Day (my wedding anniversary) this year.

 

Serious PMs appreciated.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoy watching this, but I hate people fronting their kids for questions.

 

very much so

 

+2. Happened last year too. Your kid is not "special" or "precocious" because she can read from a script that you prepared, and nobody thinks it's "cute" rather than just simply annoying. It does seem like there has been a general deterioration in the quality of the questions over the past few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kid probably has Brk shares under  her name, maybe even more shares that what you own. I think she has every rights to ask questions, same rights as everyone else.

Even though her parents may have helped with the questions, she still participated.

You guys need to learn more from Warren and Charlie, on their having a generous spirit toward people and have a kind heart. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest longinvestor

The kid probably has Brk shares under  her name, maybe even more shares that what you own. I think she has every rights to ask questions, same rights as everyone else.

Even though her parents may have helped with the questions, she still participated.

You guys need to learn more from Warren and Charlie, on their having a generous spirit toward people and have a kind heart. .

 

+1

 

Besides it’s great to bring down the average age in the arena. All 3 kids who asked questions spoke lucidly with the exception of pronouncing entrepreneur. It was quite refreshing and perhaps life changing experience for each of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think kids asking questions is fine. It's not as if adults are  asking great questions all the time. One question asked by a kid had 3 pages of write up as a back ground before getting into actual question. That can get annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest longinvestor

The FAA’s frequently answered answers during the meeting were,

 

1. Thanks for your suggestions on xyz but we’re not about to change.

2. We’re not in the investment advisory business

3. How come you didn’t figure out anti-gravity 😂

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly hope so - I was expecting a lot of negative headlines but found only one in bloomberg that said "Buffett Confronts Tech-Driven Change Amid Investor Questions". Disappointed to say the least. Now we need more seeking alpha articles and the "globe and mail" folks disseminating investing advice to sell Berkshire in favor of their favorites.

 

BRK  -3% today -looks like the annual post shareholder meeting stock price slump has started for BRK. Maybe another opportunity to buy shares in the $195 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so I was working on a post that was just going to be a simple thought experiment about BRK versus the S&P 500 going forward and questions around size and of course then I get bogged down citing Buffett partnership letters and Charlie's interview with the Journal (which was fabulous BTW) and then I notice a guy at the annual meeting kind of asked them about what I was thinking, but Buffett basically pretended (imop) not to follow the question about financial leverage/float.

 

So, if you had new BRK and it had $500 billion in assets and you invested everything in the S&P 500 and then just applied the leverage (1.6x?) from the float would you not outperform over the long term assuming positive returns in the S&P 500 and free or negative costs to the float?  What would be the logical limit of this? 

 

Maybe growth until the insurance operation keeps growing until it becomes too large and you start writing money losing business/calls on capital that coincides with a sell off in the market/economic recession (i.e., removing the two assumptions above)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must have done a poor job communicating.

 

Assume the margin rate is +5% (you are getting paid to borrow) if you are operating an insurance business as a .95 combined ratio, it is not callable, or at least totally uncorrelated. 

 

The thought experiment is how does it not outperform the index by 1.X times the leverage assuming positive equity returns and that the insurance operation doesn't get so big that it starts writing AIG trash (which I think would be the theoretical limit on that side of the B/S; on the other side it might be that you become so big you make huge market impacts when you move $$$).  [so maybe under that scenario you are looking at a 12-16% CAGR for a long-ass while versus historical 20 something.]

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...