Xerxes

yeap. Not to mention that there was also a spin-off to comply with then regulatory environment, which should also be in the post-JP Morgan (the person), IRR: the spin-off of Morgan Stanley, the investment bank arm of JP Morgan. JP Morgan (the company) was no longer in the business of investment banking up until 1990s, decades later, and only after Clinton-growth era that saw the dismantling of the regulatory environment that saw JP Morgan re-grow its investment bank franchise organically.

yes thank you starting minute 5 Re-listening now. funny how i remembered whatever I wanted to remember. She is clearly “no” on both regular and special dividend, just that the latter scores lower on the sin level.

There was a short CNBC interview with BRK board member back at the AGM, where she made it clear that there will be no regular dividends, but perhaps one day special dividend.

Hasilp i am set to arrive in Delhi in December. Flight booked but itinerary not even started. Then got the news from Trudeau this past weekend. Does this affect your plans ?

Thank you. Canadian Thanksgiving long weekend means, time to catch up on reading. I would say that when it comes Norway, Finland and Sweden, and the Baltic powers in general my history is “lacking”. So i enjoy reading up on tidbits here and there.

This is more of a Brookfield story as the 51% owner of Westinghouse, with Cameco owning the balance 49%

Good read. As always from Byron Callab

I presume you read War and Peace in English. … and not Russian. Even though French is my second language and English being third, I would have a hard time reading books in French. Yet, a French-written novel must be read in the original French. And thus War and Peace must be read in Russian. Yet we don’t have enough lifetime to learn new languages. A pity

I was going to say the same as Infoeisone. As in owned by private banks in the form of non-tradable stock.

I suppose it is hard to justify to “own” a central bank whose primary mission is probably not aligned with its shareholders all the time. I think Swiss central bank was also “investable”. In the same vein, Aramco which has I think 2% of its shares publicly traded, may have great cost advantages and dividend but if one buys those shares, one is investing in Saudi foreign policy and national interest. Nothing is wrong with that, if that is what one wishes, but just to say that it is not purely based on shareholder interest and maximizing value, even if 98% of ownership is with the Government.

thanks Bizaro Did you have TC Energy previously … and kept it post-spin. Or you were just interested in the oil pipeline assets.

Couldn’t find a Trans-Canada thread, I ll drop this here for now. TC Energy spin off of its crude oil pipeline into a new corporate entity called South Bow. Saddle with debt but sports a high dividend yield at current market price with a clear vision of reducing leverage before growing the dividend.

Damn. I stop listening to Chit Chat exactly when you said last year, it is as the name implies “chit chat”, look elsewhere for quality I think it was it AutoZone episode.

Then there is Imperial Oil. Massive outperformance for a “cyclical” company. not the only cannibal in the sector, but one that did well.

Beautiful White Mountains in NH. Got lucky with the weather and timing. Never seen so many pumpkins. Beats Canada.

https://stocks.apple.com/AmmAxPV68SJGoYzhWcT1tAw why not Fairfax !? No major banks, no rail majors. Cameco joins four Canadian firms already on the list, including Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.TO), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Constellation Software (CSU.TO), and Telus (T.TO)(TU). ———/———— Five Canadian companies cracked RBC Capital Markets' list of Top 30 Global Ideas for the fourth quarter of the year. The list, which RBC updates on a quarterly basis, features long-term names "built around bottom-up best ideas that we also view as offering attractive positioning in the current environment." Cameco (CCO.TO)(CCJ) was the only Canadian company that was newly added to the list this quarter. RBC analyst Andrew Wong says the company "is well-positioned to benefit from a renewed focus on nuclear energy, especially as a Western-based producer in a market shift towards security of supply." Cameco shares are up about 16 per cent year-to-date. "Additionally, we think Cameco has the right mix of assets to meet the coming market needs: proven uranium production with upside, conversion capacity, potential long-term enrichment technology, and nuclear services through Westinghouse," Wong wrote. Cameco joins four Canadian firms already on the list, including Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.TO), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Constellation Software (CSU.TO), and Telus (T.TO)(TU). Couche-Tard has been in the headlines recently over a bid for the Japanese parent company of the 7-Eleven convenience store chain. The proposed combination, which analysts expect will likely face scrutiny from regulators in the United States where the two companies operate many neighbouring stores, would create the largest convenience store player in the U.S. While the potential acquisition was not included in the forecast, RBC analyst Irene Nattel says the company has multiple avenues for growth, despite a challenging macroeconomic backdrop. Canadian Natural Resources was also on the list, due to what analyst Greg Pardy says was the company's "superior free cash flow generative power," its management committee structure – the company does not have a CEO – and its target of allocating free cash flow for dividends and share repurchases. Software company Constellation Software also made the list, with RBC's Paul Treiber writing that the company "is likely to generate one of the highest returns for shareholders over the long term in our coverage universe." Constellation Software is a serial acquirer of other firms. RBC says Constellation, in its 2023 fiscal year, spent a record $2.46 billion on acquisitions, compared to $1.69 billion in fiscal 2022, and $1.36 billion in fiscal 2021. Telus rounded out the five Canadian firms, remaining on the Top 30 list even amid a challenging time for the broader telecommunications sector. While the stock is down about five per cent year-to-date, RBC analyst Drew McReynolds expects Telus "to deliver industry-leading underlying growth and capital returns."

@nwoodman Is this the same book as the one below ? Odyssey_Group_Enduring_Momentum_FINAL_CMYK_05.18.2021.pdf (odysseygroup.com)

When I layer in crypto, my YTD net gain goes up from 25.61% to 25.78% Even though had a 29% gain in crypto.

Does his name rhymes with made-off

I almost submitted my resignation to myself for messing out the % return. it was 1.5% or so off. lol

I don’t usually share interim report, as it is usually noise. but this quarter is an exception Total TFSA/RRSP/LIRA return for YTD 2024. Not including crypto. 2024 Q1/Q2/Q3 => 25.6% 2023 => 24.81% 2022 => -11.48% 2021 => 20.09% 2020 => 11.36% Pre-2020 => data tracked differently so not comparable S&P500 YTD Q1/Q2/Q3 return: ~20% When the markets are going well I usually track it +/- 1-2 % and when the bear comes in (2022), I usually do better thanks to the strong tilt toward BRK and FFH. That is the source of long term outperformance I think. Q3 this year however was juicy enough to push my return way above S&P500 YTD in an upmarket. I think that would be the first time. I say Q3, because I know I closely tracked S&P500 in Q1 and Q2 of this year. S&P500 Q3 return: 5.5% No clue what is my Q3 specific return as I just check YTD always. I did a quick check, here are some Q3 alpha culprit w/ the above 20% returns: - Stelco 84% - Mercado Libre 28% - Starbucks 28% - RTX 23% - BN 24% - BIP 21% - Barrick 20%

hi John I have to re-post. it was about my YTD return, but then realized that the return was off 1-2%, b/c I forgot to remove a cash in injection in January. so I have to rerun the numbers and re-post. Wanted to make sure the return is correct. Won’t make a big difference on my initial post, but wanted it to be correct.

the “sovereign” point of view ?

I think what promoted the author to write the article was “accumulated deficit” that had to be backfilled before more $ goes to treasury …. So a pittance of remittance for time being … think that is the “news” part. So the story was structured around that. the mechanics of it is interesting though even if is missing cohesiveness, I.e rates were higher recently not lower, etc