Paarslaars

Anyone looking at defense contracters specifically to the EU? Trump is really making european politicians wake up and they will seriously need to invest in a EU army to scare off Putin. Edit: nvm reading through the thread got me some answers, going to look a bit further.

Unfortunate timing...

Yeah wasnt referring to you cutting 20%, you mentioned it was position sizing. For me it is currently 24% of my personal portfolio, most of the position was bought in the 5000-7000¥ region. Though this equates to roughly 15% of the combined portfolios so I guess I am still undersized.

All these traders selling a great long term company like Nintendo... You guys are crazy!

It will never be lasting peace, everyone knows that. Putin took Crimea and then there was peace, now he takes parts of Ukraine and there is peace, next up he'll take even more... he won't stop. This is why the EU keeps siding with Ukraine on this, they know if they don't stop him in Ukraine, he will invade the EU at one point. He wants the war to end, cutting aid without getting an agreement on peace from Ukraine/Europe is just going to make Ukraine have more casualties or Europe send more aid. That won't accomplish anything... though a nice cost saving initiative I guess.

I know the moment I start joining in on that trade it's going to reverse so I am just holding...

I believe it is still unknown if he actually had anything to do with it himself.

Because you sold... I have the other problem, typically bear runs start when I buy.

Bought some KULR options yesterday. Also switched the kids BRK portfolio to FFH.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/utah-takes-lead-potentially-enacting-bitcoin-reserve-bill

Gonna give that tiramisu a try. That said, there is a lot of growth already factored into the stock price and on the earnings call they said they do not have the capacity available at the moment to fill the demand. You are paying > 50 times earnings here...

Why?

That's not good...

https://cryptobriefing.com/czech-bitcoin-tax-mica/ There we go, that's a start!

White House crypto czar David Sacks says first priority is stablecoin legislation – NBC Chicago Not a fan of all the stable coin talk but interesting to see them talking about a SBR seperate from the sovereign fund.

That's just +/- recovering from what they lost yesterday. Probably because tarrifs got postponed.

How is that fund different from a federal gold reserve that is no longer tied to your currency?

Considering the capital people on here have, most can easily fork over the extra 50$ for a second account to temporarily switch to. I think you'll be implementing the digital equivalence of a swear jar Parsad.

Interesting. With the risk of completely derailing the thread: both of them are pro BTC I believe.

You're not getting it. Liquidity wasn't the problem, QE is inflationary, people's savings get whiped out by all the money printing. This is why BTC will be succesful.

I understand that but does it really make a difference? If the underlying business is not below the book value multiple Buffet likes and book value does not grow, Buffet will not buy back stock and your returns are solely dependent on others. I mean, there is no inside capital for gold right? Still valued at like 20T. Have all gold investors been wrong for the past 1000 years?

Haha no it's something else. When I was a young teen I had fluorecent green shoes. So I got the nickname 'groenschoen' from a friend. Used that in gaming a lot but apparently others liked it because it was often picked after a few years. So I figured I would pick similar names where the color rhymes with the noun. Came up with 'paarslaars' as the main one and 'roodpoot' as the backup.

I'll work on it

We have literally had this exact discussion on here already couple of months back I believe. Berkshire buying back shares, is someone buying into it. BTC would go up as well if a large holder buys more BTC...