LC

https://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2020/01/sec-proposes-changes-to-accredited-investor-definition/

My guess: a combination of explanations of the cash balance (including diatribe about high valuations); performance of the stock portfolio (Apple); and a bunch of the regular feel-good history lessons.

Looks interesting thx for the research idea.

What do you mean by "60 day rollover rule"? You can remove funds from your Roth IRA without penalty, if you put them back in after 60 day or less; at least that’s my understanding. Yes that's right but I am not sure whether it is required to be the exact same security which is returned. I.e. if tendering shares worth $100 and replacing with cash of $100 is considered a distribution or not. Also note you can only do this once annually.

If SBAC cannot help directly, I believe Citi operates in Cameroon. https://www.citigroup.com/citi/about/countries-and-jurisdictions/cameroon.html

I wonder if the 60 day rollover rule could apply.

You've always got such creative financing ideas; a real treat to read. Thanks for the food for thought. Cheers.

Either DIY it as Greg said or try to find brokers who WOULD be willing to tender the shares on your behalf. Open an account with them, transfer the shares over and proceed with the tender. How to find such a broker is the difficult part. If you know of other shareholders you can start there; you can also look into Camaroon brokers and try to find one that also operates in your country or is affiliated somehow with a local broker; it may be easier for them to process all the red tape if it's a related/affiliated company. Good luck

Kind of an unrelated question: Have there been any studies or literature on the threshold after which the brain becomes overwhelmed and incorrectly assigns the same or similar items as "random"? I am wording this question poorly; let me give an example: Let's say you put on headphones and listen to brief (3-4 second) jungle sounds, one after the other. A tiger roar, a monkey screech, a bird call, a waterfall, an insect sound, etc. etc etc etc. And maybe some of these are slightly different, e.g. a tiger roaring loudly, a tiger purring softly, and so on. When is the point where we hear the same sound two or three times, but can't distinguish or remember that we've heard it before? Is it after 10 sounds? 20? 50? Just wondering if anyone has seen any type of literature on this or related topics.

Ditto. 1.3x book is not a bad price for Berk esp. as it's a partially "defensive" stock with the cash and traditional businesses, and also exposed to market upside thru Apple

Some up front apologies to my German and Alabaman friends: Those were my two German jokes, please take them seriously as German humor is no laughing matter. On the other hand: Why are murders in Alabama so difficult to solve? All the DNA matches and there's no dental records.

I think the question is, "what is the eventual fallout of suspended low rates?" If there even is such a fallout. In the past it's been inflation, right? Well, we don't really see that. If there is any consequence, I think we'll see it in terms of investment options. Asset prices can only be inflated so much, eventually we hit zero or negative rates. And yields can only be compressed so much, there's already junk out there priced at 3%. So eventually the marginal investment trends to zero. Which if you're not investing that dollar, you will consume it. Perhaps then we may see inflation. Obviously this is macroeconomic musings so take it with a grain of the tea leaves I'm reading.

I looked at a recent zerohedge article about coronavirus. The three sources were: the CDC, some random guy's Tweets, and the NY Times.

Zerohedge almost never provides first-hand source material nor provides any value-addition. They just create a narrative out of pre-existing events. ZH is essentially useless to those who prefer to do their own thinking. In contrast, established journalist outlets perform their own studies, their own information gathering, their own analysis (statistical or judgmental), and present both the methodology and the results. This is useful information because it allows the reader to draw their own conclusions. For example, for years now the Washington Post has maintained its own dataset of police violence. This is a valuable service because it can be used to independently validate statistics which are self-reported by government sources. Both sources disclose the methodology behind their dataset construction, and you can use this to form your own opinion on the extent of police violence. This is the healthy function of a journalistic enterprise.

vinod, on interest rates: Interest rates are not a structural cause of change. Something causes interest rates to have a long-term level shift. The FRB sets the rates, yes. But they do so in response to economic reality. The question is, what is that reality, what are its implications, and how long will it persist. What do you think?

WHO declares global emergency: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51318246

That's a good thematic point as well. Long term impacts are difficult to foresee: Will the majority classes (either of individuals or companies) rally together and change the rules to their benefits? E.g. pro-labor/union policies, monopoly-busting regulations, etc. After all they do have the numbers advantage. Or will the Select Few Companies continue their dominance and go full-on global oligopoly? Perhaps they offer a compelling value proposition to prevent the above scenario from occurring. If we turn to art, dystopian cyber-punk science fiction (which I have a sweet spot for) paints the latter picture :D

Historically yes. And that's all we can really go on, but when that happens...who knows? FRB influencing interest rates I would argue does not fundamentally change anything. It raises the floor of asset prices but this is reactive and is a reflection of our environment. I would argue the true reduction in capital costs is not because of FRB action but because humans have become really good at obtaining and allocating resources: educating ourselves, improving technologies and efficiencies, and ultimately driving costs down for most things in life. The really big factors on the horizon that I can think of are: global politics (i.e. Russia, China, etc. and how open these regimes will be); robotization/automation of labor and the impacts this will have; overall population dynamics (increasing lifespans, how many people the earth can support); changes in how we collect and use energy; and of course other stuff that i'm not smart enough to even conceive of. But these are just guesses and I don't think anyone really knows what their effects will be. It's trying to see 5 miles down the road at the bottom of a hill through a cloudy windshield in a downpour with no wipers right after an eye exam with your kids screaming and fighting in the backseat and your mother-in-law blowing up your phone.

Yes mostly covered calls on the full position in the account (e.g. if I have 950 shares I would write 10 contracts and cover the remainder with margin) Wrote on about 1/3 of my portfolio on: Altria/Philip Morris, AT&T, Visa, Iron Mtn 2-3 month expiration, was paid about 2-4%. OOM strikes by 5-7%. I plan on closing the contracts about a week prior to any ex-dividend dates where there is a high (judgmental) probability of being called. Which as of right now does not appear likely. And then I'll roll over the contracts again for another few months, unless sales & earnings really seem to be catching up with valuations. I've also been pretty lax with my documentation here. Sold MMM yesterday (ugh - industrial activity looks weak, glad to come away with more than I put in but still disappointing); Sold Waste Mgmt a few days ago; Sold ADS a few weeks ago; Sold Paypal (rolled into Visa). Proceeds went into opening a position in AT&T, paying down some margin, adding about equally to the names mentioned above; and one tiny corporate event. I'm fully invested but looking to hedge via covered calls on more of my portfolio if I can get good prices & low risk of execution. The other thing is I have relatively substantial 401k/stock grants which are invested in SPY index and a certain high-flying tech company. So I am looking to maintain about 30-50% total upside exposure from these two positions. Even there I am debating re-allocating the 401K outside of SPY and into something more defensive, but my options are limited and that has historically been a bad idea.

I think more likely is a stagnant or slowly declining market, I've been selling calls.

I just wrapped up The Expanse. Really enjoyed it - definitely had some Battlestar Gllactica vibes

One difficult part of finding compounders in this environment is partly finding the ones which have not already leveraged themselves to the max. There are solid companies out there with defensible moats that have taken out billions in debt over the past 3-5 years (much of which has funded buybacks). And of the ones which are not incredibly leveraged, the equity is trading at very high multiples. It’s not easy.

Many times company filings or IR presentations will have comparison metrics and list the comps that management is using.

Take photos, spread the news. The world needs to know the humanitarian crisis that is developing. If this as bad as it sounds, it will need a coordinated effort to solve.

Good post. Attached is the old spreadsheet that someone (I forget who - but we all owe them a beer) put together with this formula. It's based on Eric's "Cost of leverage" posts (we all still owe this guy 2 beers). I keep a copy of this spreadsheet handy for whenever I am interested in taking a large leveraged position, to compare costs between the various leveraged strategies available. Anyone interested can check column Q for the formula, it's based on the old warrant tickers so nothing is populated but the formula should be intact. Copy_of_Options_Calculations.xlsx