Political Posts

[adesigar]

39 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

I dont give a crap what party.  Release the files in full and prosecute all the guilty parties (including those who obstructed their release).  As someone with a daughter pedophiles are the biggest scum on the planet and this shouldnt be political.

and the next biggest scum are the people defending, protecting and making excuses for the pedophiles.

[73 Reds]

43 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

I dont give a crap what party.  Release the files in full and prosecute all the guilty parties (including those who obstructed their release).  As someone with a daughter pedophiles are the biggest scum on the planet and this shouldnt be political.

Agreed, but were you making these same demands prior to Trump's re-election?  If not, what changed?

[Gregmal]

Liberals for 4 years with the coveted “files”: crickets 

 

Liberals after less than a year of Trump: WHERE R THEY! THIS IZ A COVERUP!*

 

*sorry the “he ran on it” excuse doesn’t count if you didn’t vote for him! 

[cubsfan]

1 hour ago, adesigar said:

and the next biggest scum are the people defending, protecting and making excuses for the pedophiles.

 

You can thank Trump later for removing the criminals from DC. 

[dwy000]

1 hour ago, 73 Reds said:

Agreed, but were you making these same demands prior to Trump's re-election?  If not, what changed?

I have supported going whole hog against anything Epstein related from day one. What changed (not for me but for public attention) is that Epsteins best friend became President and Trump campaigned on the promise to release the files.  

 

This is an issue where "whataboutism" isnt relevant.  We should be doing everything possible to release the files and publish the guilty including those who hid and obstructed from both parties at any time.

 

Let's get the proof in the public and then we can go crazy laying blame and charges

  

[Gregmal]

3 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

have supported going whole hog against anything Epstein related from day one.

Would this be corroborated by your post history?

Edited November 13, 2025 by Gregmal

[dwy000]

1 minute ago, Gregmal said:

Would this be corroborated by your post history?

Sure!  If it was a topic on here 6 years ago that I followed and participated in.  

[Gregmal]

21 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

Sure!  If it was a topic on here 6 years ago that I followed and participated in.  

Nice. Can we confirm, from said post history the rabidness of the enthusiasm for such topic via post count? Say pre Jan 20, 2025 and post? That was less than a year ago, and from 2019(6 years ago) we can fairly assume there’s 6-7x more posts during those 6 years than after 1/20/25?

Edited November 13, 2025 by Gregmal

[73 Reds]

14 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

I have supported going whole hog against anything Epstein related from day one. What changed (not for me but for public attention) is that Epsteins best friend became President and Trump campaigned on the promise to release the files.  

 

This is an issue where "whataboutism" isnt relevant.  We should be doing everything possible to release the files and publish the guilty including those who hid and obstructed from both parties at any time.

 

Let's get the proof in the public and then we can go crazy laying blame and charges

  

"Best friends" don't get thrown out of his club.  That aside, IIRC, the Republicans did campaign on releasing the "Epstein files" which I disagree with for the following reasons:  Just what are these "files" and what do they consist of?  Where did they come from?  Have they been reviewed and investigated for veracity, authenticity and truthfulness of whatever information may be found?  Just because records of any kind happen to be in the possession of a vile human being doesn't make them trustworthy or even material to anything.  My fear is innocent names may very well appear in many different contexts and disgorging volumes of who knows what into the public realm encourages an entirely untrustworthy media, social media and anyone who can read to cause great harm to innocent people's lives and reputations.  Yeah, the media has never been known to take something out of context, LOL.  In short, it would be reckless to release any such "files" without a heavy dose of scrutiny in advance. 

[dwy000]

13 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

"Best friends" don't get thrown out of his club.  That aside, IIRC, the Republicans did campaign on releasing the "Epstein files" which I disagree with for the following reasons:  Just what are these "files" and what do they consist of?  Where did they come from?  Have they been reviewed and investigated for veracity, authenticity and truthfulness of whatever information may be found?  Just because records of any kind happen to be in the possession of a vile human being doesn't make them trustworthy or even material to anything.  My fear is innocent names may very well appear in many different contexts and disgorging volumes of who knows what into the public realm encourages an entirely untrustworthy media, social media and anyone who can read to cause great harm to innocent people's lives and reputations.  Yeah, the media has never been known to take something out of context, LOL.  In short, it would be reckless to release any such "files" without a heavy dose of scrutiny in advance. 

Hidding information about a convicted pedophile.  You're in a cult. 

Edited November 13, 2025 by dwy000

[73 Reds]

1 minute ago, dwy000 said:

Hidding information about a convicted pedophile.  You're in a cult. 

LOL, how can someone who is so good at financial analysis be completely blinded by TDS?

[dwy000]

16 minutes ago, Gregmal said:

Nice. Can we confirm, from said post history the rabidness of the enthusiasm for such topic via post count? Say pre Jan 20, 2025 and post? That was less than a year ago, and from 2019(6 years ago) we can fairly assume there’s 6-7x more posts during those 6 years than after 1/20/25?

Hey go for it. If it was a topic I followed and participated in at the time.

 

But its interesting that you will devote that much time and effort to trying to find some gotcha post on me on a topic that any decent person should agree on. Release the files, prosecute the offenders including those who helped hide or obstruct.  Of any party at any time.  I'm shocked this is controversial. 

[dwy000]

2 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

LOL, how can someone who is so good at financial analysis be completely blinded by TDS?

This isnt just Trump.  How is wanting to expose and prosecute pedophiles controversial?  Of either party at any time.  

 

Making excuses as to why the files should not be released and examined because.they are likely to implicate your lord and master is cult-like behavior.   This should not be controversial.  Release the files and prosecute those involved. 

[73 Reds]

Just now, dwy000 said:

This isnt just Trump.  How is wanting to expose and prosecute pedophiles controversial?  Of either party at any time.  

 

Making excuses as to why the files should not be released and examined because.they are likely to implicate your lord and master is cult-like behavior.   This should not be controversial.  Release the files and prosecute those involved. 

Who said anything about not wanting to prosecute guilty parties?  That is an entirely different issue than releasing files. 

[Gregmal]

5 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

LOL, how can someone who is so good at financial analysis be completely blinded by TDS?

I think he may be under the impression that we personally have the files, or that your, mine, or his desires of what to do with such files, has an influence on their release. Basically wrong across the board. 

[dwy000]

Just now, Gregmal said:

I think he may be under the impression that we personally have the files, or that your, mine, or his desires of what to do with such files, has an influence on their release. Basically wrong across the board. 

And yet youre the one wanting to do a search going back for years to see if and what I commented on.  Like my posting on an investment board is the gating factor in their release.  

 

Its even more important now because the pedophile called Trump his best friend and Trump has shown his willingness to do almost anything to stop their release.   A president backed into a corner and willing to do anything to save himself is not good for the country. 

[73 Reds]

2 minutes ago, Gregmal said:

I think he may be under the impression that we personally have the files, or that your, mine, or his desires of what to do with such files, has an influence on their release. Basically wrong across the board. 

The idiocy of all this is Epstein made a lot of money and ran in big circles.  Names of such individuals who were business associates, clients or others who are completely innocent of any wrongdoing are as (or more) likely to be in any "files" as the names of any wrongdoers.   

[dwy000]

1 minute ago, 73 Reds said:

The idiocy of all this is Epstein made a lot of money and ran in big circles.  Names of such individuals who were business associates, clients or others who are completely innocent of any wrongdoing are as (or more) likely to be in any "files" as the names of any wrongdoers.   

Absolutely. Which is more reason to be supporting their release to prove innocence for those people and nail the guilty ones.  

[73 Reds]

2 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

Absolutely. Which is more reason to be supporting their release to prove innocence for those people and nail the guilty ones.  

You don't get it.  At all.  No one should have to prove their innocence for the sake of crazies like you.  In fact it's comments like this that make me fear for our future.

Edited November 13, 2025 by 73 Reds
missed line

[dwy000]

Just now, 73 Reds said:

You don't get it.  At all.  

And you seem to want to protect pedophiles to save your lord and master.  So if we are on opposite sides here I'm good with that. 

[73 Reds]

2 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

And you seem to want to protect pedophiles to save your lord and master.  So if we are on opposite sides here I'm good with that. 

No, its not all right to think like you do.  Glad to have fleshed out that guilt by association is perfectly acceptable and innocent people are really not innocent unless they prove it.  There are places in the World where such an ideology fits right in.  

[dwy000]

6 minutes ago, 73 Reds said:

No, its not all right to think like you do.  Glad to have fleshed out that guilt by association is perfectly acceptable and innocent people are really not innocent unless they prove it.  There are places in the World where such an ideology fits right in.  

How do you prove it?  By releasing the files. Protecting pedophiles because someone's name might be in an unrelated email is just plain wrong.  If youre innocent of wrongdoing you have no reason to fear the release.  In fact you should want it to protect your name. 

[73 Reds]

1 minute ago, dwy000 said:

How do you prove it?  By releasing the files. Protecting pedophiles because someone's name might be in an unrelated email is just plain wrong.  If youre innocent of wrongdoing you have no reason to fear the release.  In fact you should want it to protect your name. 

Releasing files doesn't prove anything.  You're an intelligent person but remarkably naive about our legal system and the consequences of being wrongfully accused of something you didn't do.  Like any other crime, the guilty can be charged and convicted without the scrutiny of the public at large.  

[Sweet]

8 minutes ago, dwy000 said:

How do you prove it?  By releasing the files. Protecting pedophiles because someone's name might be in an unrelated email is just plain wrong.  If youre innocent of wrongdoing you have no reason to fear the release.  In fact you should want it to protect your name. 

Don’t the authorities have the files?  So if there is a case to be made they can make it.  In most other investigations they don’t need to make the files public.

[73 Reds]

1 minute ago, Sweet said:

Don’t the authorities have the files?  So if there is a case to be made they can make it.  In most other investigations they don’t need to make the files public.

There is no reason to make the files public in a case like this if innocent people can be hurt.  And any innocent people will most definitely be hurt if their names are associated with Epstein.