KFRCanuk Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 http://www.reuters.com/article/americasRegulatoryNews/idUSN2342166220091123 "wynn, meanwhile, died of natural causes earlier this year -- before Fairfax's attorneys could interview him." I either forgot about this OR didn't hear about it. Does anyone have a link to the obituary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I had not heard that Gwynn died. Not to belittle anyone's death, but who here believes that Gwynn died of natural causes considering everyone now implicated in the Galleon case? Patrick Byrne has received death threats, but people thought he was crazy. Even I was warned to be careful of these guys! Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldye Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 This all sounds like something from a John Grisham novel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubuy2wron Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 This all sounds like something from a John Grisham novel. I absolutely think there is a heck of a screenplay or novel in the stories as they are evolving. I have read deepcapture since day 1 and have watched the stories emerge and have had exactly the same thoughts truth is stranger than fiction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFRCanuk Posted November 24, 2009 Author Share Posted November 24, 2009 This all sounds like something from a John Grisham novel. I was thinking of Micheal Clayton/uNorth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharperDingaan Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 You have to wonder if the 'awkward time' for SAC isn't an approaching redemption window. Run now, while you still can ? SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smw397 Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 I just googled the hell out of him and I can't find any reference to John Gwynn dying, other than this article that appeared today. Loads of links to his firing last October and pretty much nothing at all since, other than a few references back to that time and his earlier interactions with Kynicos, SAC, and Third Point. In the days leading up the the Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling trials, I came to use "Baxter" as a verb. I agree with Sanjeev, I think ol' Gwynne went and got himself Baxtered. (Cliff Baxter was the Enron executive found in his car with a gunshot to the head. It was ruled a suicide but the more you read about it the easier it is to believe there was something else going on there). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFRCanuk Posted November 26, 2009 Author Share Posted November 26, 2009 http://www.fairfax.ca/Assets/Downloads/Press/fpr2006-07-26.pdf So in the legal Documents, his name is John D. Gwynn. I think if I can find out what the D is then I should be able to find the obituary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsad Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 I still don't understand how Peter Eavis, Fabrice Taylor and Herb Greenberg squirmed their ways out of the Fairfax lawsuit. I'm guessing it would have been very hard to bring them into the suit without them utilizing the first amendment to protect themselves...especially Eavis. http://www.deepcapture.com/tag/peter-eavis/ Eavis remains an employee of the WSJ and is a professional photographer. You can see his works and interviews all over the net. I'm not sure what happened to his pastoring sabbatical, but perhaps it was enough to establish a tax-shelter for his retirement fund. I'm also not sure how the hell John Hempton, one of the main culprits in this whole debacle, managed to be excluded from the lawsuit. Perhaps Hempton has become a rat like Sam Antar and is spilling the beans, or perhaps Fairfax is just going after the big guns. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crip1 Posted November 27, 2009 Share Posted November 27, 2009 We've seen much evidence come out in discovery, etc, over the past several months. This would look to be the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The remainder of the evidence will come out, eventually, and in that evidence we will likely see the reasons why Prem and Co. named the individuals in the lawsuit. My best guess as to why Eavis, Taylor and Greenberg went un-named is simply lack of indefensable evidence. Rather than name everyone under the moon and stars, Prem and company only named the individuals for whom they had substantial evidence. That's certainly not to say that the three individuals noted above are not guilty, but the more focused and targeted lawsuit, the better the chances of success. It is bitterly disappointing that the wheels of justice churn so slowly in instances such as this. The lawsuit was filed, what, 3+ years ago? And we are still many months away from any verdict (which will undoubtedly be appealed if the alleged are found to be guilty). Because of this...these criminals (and they are just as guilty as theives, murderers and rapists) are still allowed to commit their crimes. Nauseating. Justice needs to come, and right soon. -Crip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now