John Hjorth Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 I have no understanding of the strategy implemented here by 17M. I can't relate to it. But I can relate to position sizing. Position sizing - to me - is not only about cash vs MTM values of positions measured against investment ideas at a certain point in time, to me it's also about cash vs capital already allocated to a certain investment idea [down a lot or not, or the opposite], measured as an absolute cap, measured in percent. For every idea, to which I commit capital, while taking the initial investment, I also put on a cap [in percent] of total portfolio, to which is the max the position is to grow [,or to what I'm going to loose, if I'm totally dead wrong], based on my conviction on the idea. I may reconsider along the way on positions, but the tresholds met both downwards [max capital allocation] and upwards forces me to actually think about it. That way of doing things makes me avoid blowing up totally. I may mess up my pants, but I walk away with messed up pants, nothing more. I don't blow up, by continuing allocating further capital to my "best idea" actually beeing my worst, like shoveling capital into a black hole. The last part of the last 17M Blog entry seems to me like the last moves in a Chess game of a looser, ref. above.
mcliu Posted February 10, 2016 Posted February 10, 2016 What was his performance? Was it that dire? Market really isn't off by that much from its highs.. ???
marazul Posted February 11, 2016 Posted February 11, 2016 Can someone post the copy of the text, the blog is protected. Thanks in advance.
plato1976 Posted February 11, 2016 Posted February 11, 2016 Market is not off from the top by too much, but most energy was slaughtered. I guess that's why cardboard feels esp bad
thefatbaboon Posted February 11, 2016 Posted February 11, 2016 I feel bad for this guy and have no interest in kicking him at all. For what it's worth, I think he made a mistake valuing midstream assets. Very simply one needed to make a quick valuation using simple Ev/ebitda ratios and then check history where these assets can trade. I'm no expert on this area at all but I can find many historical transactions occurring between 8 and 10 times. I don't know why therefore anyone would be so surprised to see valuations come into these zones. Having now finally arrived into historical cheap zones my guess is that he is making a mistake to sell.
Ballinvarosig Investors Posted February 11, 2016 Posted February 11, 2016 You can still get access to his blog through Google cache, if you so wish. I do feel bad for him though. Energy investors have been hit by a perfect storm. However, it does seem to me that investors in that sector have been drinking the Kool-Aid for too long. It seems there was a perception that energy costs could only ever go up, and that led to a heck of a lot of speculation in the market. What I find remarkable is how Buffett seems to have foreseen this trainwreck.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now