Homestead31 Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 Excerpt from Khrom Capital's letter available here: http://www.gurufocus.com/news/355992/khrom-capital-june-30-letter-to-investors any guesses what this position could be? We recently made a new investment based on taking this lifetime view of a business. This company is disrupting a large industry; it has only a 0.3% share of a growing market, a clear and increasing competitive advantage, an astute and well incentivized board of directors, and is run by an extraordinarily intelligent CEO who has a clear strategic vision and has created an outstanding corporate culture. However, if our investment strategy focused on trying to estimate what the stock price could be in a year – or even five years – from now, we might have passed on this investment. There are many reasons that the stock price could decline in the near term. Competition will likely increase since the opportunity that this company is pursuing is large and lucrative. The company’s current profitability is depressed, and its CEO will likely continue to suppress it further in pursuit of significant advantages of scale. The U.S. economy may enter another recession, and since this business hasn’t previously proven itself through an economic contraction, there may be panicked sellers of the stock. These and other factors may make for a “messy” stock price over the next few years. However, by encouraging ourselves (and structuring our partnership to allow us) to think as permanent owners of the business, we focused our attention not on the share price this company could trade for in a few years, but on the profits this business is likely to produce over the next few decades. Ironically, the farther out we look, the easier it becomes for us to approximately predict things. Focus on long-term profitability For example, take the risk of competition. We think that this company has obvious and growing competitive advantages that should help solidify it as the dominant player in its space. (Think how the number of search engine startups dried up once Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) solidified its dominant position.) We think it is ideal that this management is willing to reduce short-term profitability to invest in growing the company’s competitive advantage, increasing the quality of its long-term profitability. (Think how Amazon.com, Inc. [NASDAQ:AMZN] has barely shown any profits for over a decade, but the value of its business has grown significantly every year.) We think that a recession could benefit this company, since their cash-rich balance sheet, economies of scale and prudent management team would enable them to grow stronger as weaker competitors die off. (Think how Wells Fargo & Co. [NYSE:WFC] is earning more money today than before the Great Recession.) In short, since we do not need to concern ourselves with where the stock price will be in the next few years (since you have allowed us to follow an investment strategy that focuses on the fundamentals of a business), we are able to look beyond all the short-term noise. That is how we attempt to generate our excess returns. By taking the profits that people cannot take (and hopefully avoiding the losses that they incur) because they want to rent a stock.
OracleofCarolina Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 sounds like a great idea but I am stumped on this..no clue
mrholty Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 A guess would be TSLA as its just a fraction of the entire automotive market.
rpadebet Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 Sounds like Tesla to me. Fits tesla more than anything. Maybe Netflix too...depends on how market is defined.
benhacker Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 Maybe it's LC, the market share calculation could be done a few days, but I don't think the comparisons to network effect companies at the end of the commentary would make you think TSLA personally...
Guest Grey512 Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 I do not believe this to be Tesla because Khrom's letter references a strong cash position of the business. Tesla's cash position and balance sheet do not look unassailable to me. At the current run-rate, even after the recent capital raise, Tesla might run out of money by 2018.
Guest Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 any idea how much the minimum to invest is? I believe the fund is still open.
ragu Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 My best guess is YUME Decent shout. Worth looking at this. Best, Ragu
rpadebet Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 XPO came to mind. XPO has debt. Maybe RLGT. They are very small compared to size of market and have cash
KCLarkin Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 If you squint really hard, it sounds a bit like Wayfair. But this is so vague it could be anything.
AccentricInv Posted August 29, 2015 Posted August 29, 2015 Don't they need to report the positions? He's still at 40M and so doesn't need to report to the SEC or file a 13F. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong?
AzCactus Posted August 29, 2015 Posted August 29, 2015 Id be interested to know any of his positions because it looks like the fund is beating the market by 20% or so this year.
roughlyright Posted August 29, 2015 Posted August 29, 2015 I am very interested in finding out what it could be. He had so many great calls. His picks are so far away from the Main Street or other popular value investors
Txvestor Posted August 29, 2015 Posted August 29, 2015 Not so sure about paying too much attention to this. One of his previous investments that he touted as a long term buy and hold was SHOS, sears hometown and outlet stores. Compared it to ACE hardware, its franchisee high ROIC model etc. This was before he stopped discussing specific investments in his letters. That thesis clearly did not play out the way he projected it to do. I suspect he is long out of that investment since it obviously did not seem to hit his returns, but thats difficult to track since I'm not aware of any 13f filing needs since I think he is below the threshold.
Travis Wiedower Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Not so sure about paying too much attention to this. One of his previous investments that he touted as a long term buy and hold was SHOS, sears hometown and outlet stores. Compared it to ACE hardware, its franchisee high ROIC model etc. This was before he stopped discussing specific investments in his letters. That thesis clearly did not play out the way he projected it to do. I suspect he is long out of that investment since it obviously did not seem to hit his returns, but thats difficult to track since I'm not aware of any 13f filing needs since I think he is below the threshold. Disregarding all future investment ideas because of one bad investment is not very smart. Every single investor in the world makes a lot of bad investments over a career. It's very possible to make a good investment and still lose money on it just like it's possible to flip a coin ten times and get heads all ten times.
Evolveus Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Minimum investment is $1m. Sounds a bit like IBKR to me, but not sure if that position is 'new' to them.
mvalue Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 Minimum investment is $1m. Sounds a bit like IBKR to me, but not sure if that position is 'new' to them. IBKR was my thought except that it's arguably been "proven" through a recession in contrast to his description...
Evolveus Posted September 1, 2015 Posted September 1, 2015 I think Workday checks a lot of the boxes that Khrom mentions in his letter. Net cash position, current depressed profitability due to growing scale, incentivized board/founder, long term vision not worried about volatility, and disrupting the HR/human capital management industry. Thoughts? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-31/workday-ceo-bhusri-says-tech-bubble-limited-to-private-companies
orthopa Posted September 1, 2015 Posted September 1, 2015 Minimum investment is $1m. Sounds a bit like IBKR to me, but not sure if that position is 'new' to them. Seems like a high minimum with only 40M AUM. On the plus side he would intimately know all of his investors.
Evolveus Posted September 1, 2015 Posted September 1, 2015 Per SEC Form D's that have been filed, they have sold ~$90m worth of subscriptions when you tally the three offerings...not sure where the $40m is coming from. http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1586094/000158609413000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
jawn619 Posted September 1, 2015 Posted September 1, 2015 My best guess is YUME Decent shout. Worth looking at this. Best, Ragu would love someone to send a writeup on this if anyone has.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now