Correct. It's easy to beat your competitors on price and grow if you don't need to make a profit. For now Amazon is not a business. It's a non-profit.
You're looking at it wrong.
For sure I am. After all a company is not supposed to make money.
A company is supposed to create value. Reinvesting all your earnings internally is one way to create value. TCI didn't have any earnings either.
Update: A bit more here http://www.cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/investment-ideas/amzn-amazon-com-inc/msg300226/#msg300226
Correct. It's easy to beat your competitors on price and grow if you don't need to make a profit. For now Amazon is not a business. It's a non-profit.
You're looking at it wrong.
Sometimes the value of the lesson learned from a mistake - over the long term - is higher than actually not making the mistake. I don't know if it's the case here, but hopefully that offers some consolation :)
For someone living in Quebec where there's a Couche Tard on every other street corner, it was probably more obvious. I missed it too, but mostly because I felt it was outside of my circle of competence.
http://thehappyphilosopher.com/single-player-game/
Good read, lots of wisdom in there. Relatively short but covers lots of ground, lots of "idea hooks" that you can follow deeper. Thought some here would find it interesting.
Thanks. I saw that book mentioned on a French-language forum and added it to my list, but haven't read it yet. Wasn't sure if it was actually worth-reading.
No idea where the insecurity is coming from, I feel like I missed a thread somewhere. Personally, I'm just not interested in pharma supply chain right now, so that's why I haven't really commented on anything in that field.
Some of the latter chapters were of little interest to me, but I can imagine that they'd be a good primer on a few things for a more general audience or investing-beginners, so I don't mind to much. I just skimmed them (realizing that I didn't have to finish books and read every word was a very freeing realization). That's the good interpretation. The bad one is that some editor said: "We need more pages".
Moody's downgrading six canadian banks:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-10/six-canadian-banks-cut-by-moody-s-over-consumers-debt-burden
I thought this interview was interesting (starts Page 36):
http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/valueinvesting/sites/valueinvesting/files/Graham%20%20Doddsville_Issue%2030_Spring%202017%20-%20v3.pdf
Found via Bluegrass Capital:
I wasn't doing a trick question based on genetics, I was saying "your kid" as in "a kid you consider your own, that you raised and love" (biological or not).
It's not even a theoretical question. Some people have let their kids die voluntarily because of stupid religious beliefs. Is forcing them to cure the kid more evil than letting the kid die because they don't believe in medicine?