thepupil
Member-
Posts
5,006 -
Joined
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by thepupil
-
Appreciate the ripple commentary guys, the company seems like a good SPAC target!
-
https://www.bamsec.com/filing/156459020052144?cik=1067983 see page 21, 9/30, berkshire valued the pref at $8.1B and the warrants at $1.5B 6/30 this was $7.8B (roughly same on warrants) 3/30 this was $5.5B ($2.3B on warrants, higher because of higher vol input i guess even though their likelihood of being ITM was lower in March) Right now, I'd guess the pref is worth par (OXY 2049's yield 5.5% so 2.5% pick up for being subordinated / not transferable / not cash pay seems fair = 8% = fair = pref worth par), too lazy to value the warrants. the callability in 10 years at $105 caps how much more than par the pref can be worth, making it have less convexity than a long duration fixed income investment. because of this and the subordination, i could hear an argument for lower (80-90 cents?) but who knows.
-
Berkshire Hathaway - Break it up? - Size is the anchor of performance
thepupil replied to ander's topic in Berkshire Hathaway
one thing I've wondered is whether or not Berkshire would be helped or hurt from a regulatory standpoint if BNSF / BE floated 10% public stakes, which would put a market value on them. the conventional wisdom would be that a 10% float stock would trade at a discount to peers, though I'm not sure that's the case as the float would be big enough to attract a liquid diversified but high quality shareholder base (10% of BNSF would be a $12-$16B company), you could probably build a decent shareholder register quite easily, and the governance concerns with a minority stub, in my view would be mitigated by the berkshire brand / very understandable capital allocation policies (BNSF distributes cash as it can, BE retains earnigns) would the market look on Berkshire differently if instead of owning these 2 businesses privately (worth about $200B in my view: UNP + 2x book for BE = $200B, $150B if you're feeling conservative and value-y) Berkshire owned 90% of them and 10% floated freely. they are already SEC filers with independent capital raising ability. tax consolidation would still exist above 80% ownership IIRC. would Berkshire as a business benefit from this? -
does anyone know of a good primer on Ripple Labs / XRP. <---this is probably the wrong word, as when i google "ripple labs primer" I mostly get crypto hyper promotional things and the pitch for why it is changing the world. i'm looking for something a bit more...skeptical/where the aduience is dumb non tech saavy / crypto ignorant investors like myself. I have about 10% in Tetragon Financial which has 7.5% of NAV in Ripple Labs 2019 Series C at $10B. this gives me a 70 bp look-through position in Ripple Labs. since TFG trades at 40% of NAV, Ripple Labs can also be seen as about 20% of the market cap of TFG, so on the upper bound, I have 200 bps in this cryptothingamajig. I recognize they have a website with lots of stuff, but really I'm looking for some kind of reasonably saavy neutral party / external investor who has commented on "why Ripple Labs is worth $0" or "why Ripple Labs could be worth $50B". if there's anything that comes to mind, would be most appreciated. I'm not going to put too much time into it because it's not a huge part of the thesis, but if I can shamelessly piggyback off someone else's commentary in terms of deciding whether this has 20% chance of being worht $0 or 80% chance, it'd be helpful. https://ripple.com/content-library
-
Berkshire Hathaway - Break it up? - Size is the anchor of performance
thepupil replied to ander's topic in Berkshire Hathaway
Ultimately I think PSR risks breaking the bond between regulators and the monopolies / oligopolies that are the railroads. Buffett won't say it as directly, but that's pretty much the gist of BNSF/Berkshire's view on PSR. Why mess up a cozy high ROE business for more earnings, particularly as the US swings more democrat? https://www.railwayage.com/news/matt-rose-less-is-not-better/ -
Berkshire Hathaway - Break it up? - Size is the anchor of performance
thepupil replied to ander's topic in Berkshire Hathaway
100% of the membership interests of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC outstanding as of February 21, 2020 is held by National Indemnity Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. LC, BNSF is 100% owned by National Indemnity (10-K quoted above), and provides capital to the insurance operation; BNSF does not (on my view) benefit. Independent peer, UNP has no problem raising equally cheap debt capital. -
Berkshire, office, tetragon, mineral royalties, asian conglomerates!
-
to benefit from this underperforming, now overly diversified, pretty much outsourced to various investor vehicles portfolio, you must marry me. i like you gregmal, just not that much.
-
this is a bit stale, but pretty much the same, I think people will be surprised how the real estate has decreased. I feel naked, having revealed the entire pupil book. i'll keep the family's accounts I manage a secret to maintain some option of fudging reported performance numbers. PERSHING SQUARE HOLDINGS LTD 9.4% ~25% discount, in Ackman we trust TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP LTD 9.1% ~60% discount, in Reade we trust BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 8.6% ~20% discount, in Warren we trust EQUITY COMMONWEALTH 7.1% ~5% discount to NAV most of which cash, in Sam we trust ALEXANDER'S INC 6.0% ~25-35% discount, much of which cash, in Steve we trust Cash 5.4% JBG SMITH PROPERTIES 5.1% VANGUARD TOT STK MKT-ADM 5.0% PARAMOUNT GROUP INC 4.2% OLD REPUBLIC INTL CORP 4.1% APARTMENT INVT & MGMT CO -A 4.0% BLACK STONE MINERALS LP 3.9% JARDINE STRATEGIC HLDGS LTD 3.7% GRIFFIN INDUSTRIAL REALTY IN 3.3% SPDR GOLD SHARES 3.0% BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGE-CL A 2.6% LAACO LTD-UNITS OF LTD PRTNS 2.3% CEDAR REALTY TRUST INC 1.7% January 22 Calls on BERY US 1.7% UNITED DEVELOPMENT FUNDING I 1.6% <---should be $0 HAW PAR CORP LTD 1.6% PLAYMATES TOYS LTD 1.4% FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK/CA 1.4% ISHARES SILVER TRUST 1.2% JARDINE MATHESON HLDGS LTD 1.2% March 21 Calls on JOE US 0.6% January 23 Puts on BRK/B US 0.3% March 21 Calls on VNO US 0.3% January 22 Calls on BERY US 0.2% January 22 Calls on BERY US 0.1%
-
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/12/03/opinion/covid-19-vaccine-timeline.html based on this, I'll get it after about 97% of Americans. My wife (who works in a hospital) will get it after 3% (potentially 1st dose in December, though there are more front-line types that are presumably ahead of her)
-
Massive opportunity developing in gold stocks
thepupil replied to Cardboard's topic in General Discussion
a reasonable article discussing gold and its relationship to stocks and inflation. https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1011134/gold-is-a-dull-investment -
Massive opportunity developing in gold stocks
thepupil replied to Cardboard's topic in General Discussion
Gold is an element and therefore fungible and investable at scale (central banks and large institutions can trade gold and, absent chicanery, know precisely what they’re buying / selling), not so with diamonds (or art or air cooled 911’s or whatever) I do not know this for sure but I’d expect the above ground gold supply to be far less volatile than diamonds (ie I think there are big diamond discoveries that can be large relative to existing supply). This has happened with gold several times in history, but is probably less likely to happen today than with diamonds; someone more knowledgeable than I can opine) -
Massive opportunity developing in gold stocks
thepupil replied to Cardboard's topic in General Discussion
I own some gold; I expect a very volatile 0% real return with some convexity/hedging benefits in the event of high inflation/some other macro scenarios. I think most people outside of gold bugs view it this way, no? -
I love that chapter, but don’t quite understand the relevance other than “office RE values can fall very low / are very cyclical over long periods of time”; is that your point?
-
so this is all of course anecdotal, but I beyond multifamily / condos, I have seen very little evidence of any loss in value of well-located residential real estate. the single family market seems to be universally doing well, both close to cities and further out my zestimate (which seems correct based on some recent sales/comps, but not a huge # of data points because inventory / transaction activity is so low) has gone from $470 / foot (2019 real price) to ~$513/foot. there's no reason to pay those prices unless you value the convenience and lifestyle of living near the city / in good school districts, access to restaurants, airports, amenities, etc. i don't think WFH has drastically changed the value of those things. as long as people are realistic on pricing, homes continue to sell w/i a couple of days of listing. this probably has more to do with how low rates are, but you'd think that if everyone wanted to have 4K sf and an acre in the exurbs, people wouldn't be tripping over themselves to buy 2K sf on 1/4 acre near the city (for more $) i think WFH will make people priced out into the exurbs have a better life, they won't have to commute every day, but it's not clear to me that there will be marked decrease in pricing for well-located close-in convenient real estate near cities. maybe if rates rise significantly that will change. here's an example of the type of thing that i think needs to correct pretty hard: https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7171-Woodmont-Ave-UNIT-307-Bethesda-MD-20815/166716517_zpid/ 2015 built condo offered at $740K / $690/foot, sold for $800K in 2016. you can see this was a rental asking $3,300 / month pre-covid). this building is popular with downsizing boomers who want to live a convenient walkable and luxurious lifestyle (not a thing during covid, but probably will still be afterwards). This building was built at the exact time (I think by the same developer) as a rental building across the street, where you can rent a similar unit for $3,600 / month, that's before any incentives. https://www.flatsatbethesdaavenue.com/floor-plans/apartments?bed_count=2 I'd say the market rental rate for the condo is $2,700 - $3,000 so if you bought the condo for cash at $740K, you'd have $800/month in HOA and $700/month in property taxes=$1,500 of cost and you'd be getting about $3,000 / month in imputed rent for a $1,500 / month "NOI" = $18K / year = $18K / $740K = 2.4% cap rate. The fact that it's "expensive" doesn't really matter so much as there are 100's more of these being built and rent growth is not likely in the near term or intermediate term. single family homes trade at similar cap rates, but there' no more land to create more of those and demand > supply.
-
The orgiastic future...as represented by the shores of Windsor Ontario
-
I began to like New York, the racy, adventurous feel of it at night, and the satisfaction that the constant flicker of men and women and machines gives to the restless eye. The city seen from the Queensboro Bridge is always the city seen for the first time, in its first wild promise of all the mystery and the beauty in the world. There’s a reason the great american novel wasn’t about Detroit.
-
High Quality Multi-family REITs - EQR, CPT, ESS, AVB
thepupil replied to thepupil's topic in General Discussion
luxury building on union square south going for $884K / unit. without knowledge of the value of the retail, difficult to figure out an "apartment only" price. an NYC bear say "you can't count this one, because it has high value retail near/on union square. that's not a real per unit price"...to which i'd respond" so you're saying well-located NYC retail has a lot of value? this is a pretty expensive building: https://streeteasy.com/building/1-union-square-south-new_york#tab_building_detail=1 a penthouse 1BR is $6K and a studio is $3.5K. bonus points to who knows who owns the whole foods next door on Union Square, Whole Foods first location in NYC. i'll give you a hint. it rhymes with Tornado. -
this is funny, when people ask me for stock tips (who don't know much about investing), I tell them EQC (the most boring thing I own) and then whatever the most juicy option thing I own at the time is (CDR right now). I tell them, you'll probably put a small amount of money in ____ (super levered thing) and lose it all but it's a good gamble. No one ever asks more questions about EQC after a brief description. EDIT: I also tell them to index all that said, if i ever manager others' money in a professional fashion, it will be anchored by my and my immediate family and some friends...so I don't quite agree with the "don't mix family/friends" stuff.
-
not to mention the pricing from a consumer standpoint is starting to get super attractive in my view: https://streeteasy.com/building/360-east-57-street-new_york/10b this apartment (well one a few floors up or down) was $5100 when i lived there in the early 2010's. it's now $4200. rent down 20% from almost 10 years ago, while salaries/all-in comp for elite fields is probably up 20% (or more in some instances, I'm honestly not as in tune with entry level comp for banking/consulting/tech) the living room can be a 3rd bedroom, that's $1,400 / month average for 3 dudes to live in manhattan making like mid $100's 1st year out of college (finance/tech/whatever), or $2000/month for recently graduated big law types making $250K (you get your own bathroom and a full living room for having to deal with law school). i'm sure this apartment is not the cheapest/most expensive, i just picked this one because i have a great sense of comparability and know what it's like to actually live there (it's nice, doorman building, perfectly acceptable). it's not a hip spot, the neighborhood's kind of boring, but you're a walk away from the offices in midtown and a wasted cab ride away from lots of night life. people make a lot more today than in the early 2010's, the disposable income of the yuppie crowd. rents down = massive increase in disposable income for playing and getting ahead in the greatest city in the world and that applies at all levels. think how cheap its getting to share apartments in outer boroughs. sure that's bad for near term NOI, but it also creates an attractive pull. you can say "well ya but you could get a house or your own apartment for that in XXX", sure, but it's not in NYC. rents are skyrocketing in the places people are leaving to. like in south Florida for example. the NYC premium collapsing should help buffer the "exodus" EDIT: for context, the 2BR I shared in the south immediately after my time in NYC is now $2000 up from $1500. So the spread went from $3,700/month to $2,200/month.
-
How much NYC office do you still own? This is what makes a market. low teens % of portfolio and dropping.
-
I've personally sold all my NYC focused REITs and purchased a boutique hotel in Belgrade, as it's the future. https://nypost.com/2020/11/17/serbia-is-a-new-unlikely-oasis-for-nyc-residents-fleeing-the-city/
-
Party over? Depression of the likes we have never seen before?
thepupil replied to Cardboard's topic in General Discussion
I don’t think we’ll have a depression, probably just an extinction level event.
