gaf63 Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 CR of 91% , profits up over '08, and comments on improvement in reinsurance markets in report http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&tkr=FFH%3AUS&sid=amIcrKnsjD50
oldye Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 This business will be far more profitable if Hamblin Watsa invest its assets in something other than short-term bonds.
Redskin212 Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Also, there will be good cost savings from no longer being a listed company.
ERICOPOLY Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 Market conditions and pricing have improved, in line with expectations, particularly in the reinsurance account. Tis the season for price firming I guess. Last week I got a phone call that my family health insurance premiums have been raised by $70 per month. The upside is that the amount I spend on insurance is dwarfed by what can be achieved through my ownership in Fairfax.
treasurehunt Posted July 29, 2009 Posted July 29, 2009 This business will be far more profitable if Hamblin Watsa invest its assets in something other than short-term bonds. According to the report, Advent has about 600 million dollars of investments, the vast majority of which is in short-term US treasury bills. Their investment return for the first half was just 0.46%. Can Fairfax just add the 600 million to its pool of investments without restrictions? If yes, this sounds like a great deal even at a price of 150 million dollars for the whole of Advent (I think Fairfax paid quite a bit less than this).
Uccmal Posted July 30, 2009 Posted July 30, 2009 This business will be far more profitable if Hamblin Watsa invest its assets in something other than short-term bonds. According to the report, Advent has about 600 million dollars of investments, the vast majority of which is in short-term US treasury bills. Their investment return for the first half was just 0.46%. Can Fairfax just add the 600 million to its pool of investments without restrictions? If yes, this sounds like a great deal even at a price of 150 million dollars for the whole of Advent (I think Fairfax paid quite a bit less than this). No. However, what they can do is exert full control over where the money is invested within the statuatory limits of the operating jurisdiction. So, if they are required to keep 30% in cash and short term they could invest the rest in something more lucrative. Other advantages of full ownership: 1) There are no issues investing capital into Advent for expansion purposes - no need to get approval from other shareholders. 2) If Advent has a statuatory surplus of cash it can be dividended directly to FFH. My suspicion is that all of the international subs such as Advent, Polish Re, The middle east one, and ICICI Lombard will be receiving cash from FFH as the market hardens so they can write more business.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now