Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, changegonnacome said:

 The left would say that is discrimination but the reality is inviting people into your country who despise your values and culture is just not a good idea ever.

 

+1

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I think in general, the leftists who would “disagree” with the above are actually disagreeing with dumbasses who think following a different religion (re:not Christianity) or something like that “is despising our values and culture”.  These dumbasses are few and far between but exist.

 

On the other hand, while few and far between, there certainly are some leftists who think we should invite ppl into this country who truly do despise our culture.

 

I think most people are reasonable and our media likes to pretend we are more divided and extreme as a nation than we really our - a few extreme outliers on both sides don’t reflect what the average conservative and liberal in our country is actually like.

 

Maybe I’m naive and just want to see the best in us though. 

Posted

Old code is bad code

 

This typically is true when the requirements and circumstances have changed.  The problem with new code is that it is still code, and all code will have bugs.  So new code will have a new set of bugs.  Most coders, new or experienced, will typically come along looking at the legacy code and legacy bugs thinking they can 'fix' the issues by writing new code, only to find out their new code has new issues.  Some of those new issues can not be solved because of some new flaws in the underlying models.

 

The solution is to have a solid underlying model, document that model so future coders have a clear understanding of the limits of that model, so when situation changes that require a model change, the model is updated and relevant code re-written to fit the new model.

 

Law and religions are just code for people with more uncertainty in execution, when compared against computers.

 

I think all the religion have the same goal of improving society.  Good ideas, for the conditions at the time, will allow followers of those religion to out perform than the followers of religions that have worse ideas.  Back when there is a lot less number of people, having followers out-number the followers of a competitive religion is a huge advantage, as it provide the margin to prevent the religion from dying out.  So it was important to have built-in elements that allow followers of those religion to out-grow the ones that don't have those built-in elements.  So anti-abortion, and anti-suicide are some of those elements.

 

The conditions for some of those ideas have changed, and accordingly, some of those ideas are now no longer as relevant.

 

If viewed from this perspective, you can judge, with more ease, whether a particular practice/idea is good or bad without holding them as dogmas.  Blindly following the best practices should be treated as the default mode, as there will be ones that don't have the capacity or time to actually go through the exercise of properly evaluating every ideas codified in every religion or legal system.  But every code in the religion or legal system must justify its experience by explaining the 'why', so future coders can come along to properly evaluate whether those practices are now bad code, or at least identify the over-looked places where improvements can be made.  Hopefully there's also some form of change log that also captures those reasoning to provide a historical solution cookbook of sorts to draw from when those type of problem arise again.

Posted
On 12/18/2024 at 10:26 AM, Dinar said:

You claim that Arabs/Africans/Muslim don't achieve as much as the Jews due to their environment.  I offered you to test your theory: achievement of both ethnic groups in Europe today.  Go ahead and test your theory, see what the results will be.  I haven't seen one article about terrorist attack committed by a Jew in Europe in the last thirty years, while see how many actual and attempted terror attacks have been by Muslims.  

Hey racist dumbf*ck can you please Google "Who is currently being indicted as a WAR CRIMINAL by the international courts?" and let me know what their ethnicity/religion is listed as? Thanks. 

 

You idiots are defining terrorism as something done by Muslims, basically, and then painting the bullseye around the arrow. 

 

@Parsad why are we letting this racist filth permeate the board? 

Posted
1 hour ago, coc said:

Hey racist dumbf*ck can you please Google "Who is currently being indicted as a WAR CRIMINAL by the international courts?" and let me know what their ethnicity/religion is listed as? Thanks. 

 

You idiots are defining terrorism as something done by Muslims, basically, and then painting the bullseye around the arrow. 

 

@Parsad why are we letting this racist filth permeate the board? 

 

If you can't figure out who the terrorist is at the table, it's probably the evangelical christian.

 

https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Spekulatius said:

 

 

Not that bullish for the SP500, imo.

The earnings estimates for SP500 in 2025 and 2026 are increasing in the double digits  +13% in 2025 and +11% in 2026. Factset is expecting 14.8% earnings growth in 2025. https://insight.factset.com/sp-500-cy-2025-earnings-preview-analysts-expect-earnings-growth-of-15

 

If the wars come to an end and the government deficit comes under control in the US; I expect more upside longer term.

 

AI can help improve productivity significantly - https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/openai-s-o3-model-aced-a-test-of-ai-reasoning-but-it-s-still-not-agi/ar-AA1wfITU

 

 

Edited by TB
Posted
12 hours ago, TB said:

 

Commercial Nuclear Fusion Power Plant commissioned

Is the Commonwealth Fusion System upstart financing this? I hope so, because they are far away from even have a prototype. Their reactor at this time are not even energy positive yet, that years out. From there, it probably takes decades to provide a commercially viable prototype.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Spekulatius said:

Is the Commonwealth Fusion System upstart financing this? I hope so, because they are far away from even have a prototype. Their reactor at this time are not even energy positive yet, that years out. From there, it probably takes decades to provide a commercially viable prototype.

Looks like they have raised the funds, definitely dreaming big  - https://cfs.energy/news-and-media/commonwealth-fusion-systems-closes-1-8-billion-series-b-round

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...