I think the argument gets compelling if you believe the following:
1. Prem Watsa's track record and management.
2. Middle class growth in India > 20% (which will vastly outpace NA)
3. Ability to select early, but already highly profitable companies.
4. Disciplined approach: backing away from deals when valuation is unrealistic - ie. Catholic Syrian Bank.
5. Highly respected in India - people seem to want to do business with them (and give up substantial equity to do so).
6. Diversification - holds many companies and the list is growing, diversity of industry.
7. Powerhouse Gems: IIFL, BIAL (incl 460 Ac of valuable land), and possibly now Infibeam.
8. Confidence/ collaboration of investment powerhouses: OMERS and others.
I do not believe that it is possible to accurately value this company at this early stage.
OTH, I believe that this company is far more valuable than its share price currently.
Yes I am very bullish. Yes, my valuation is very subjective an not necessarily based objective valuation.
Hopefully the rationale is sound.
In my experience, to be successful in investing you need a couple of home runs in a field of avg performers.
I think FIH.U magnifies that potential by levering the above 8 points through equity selection in India, where the market is still very young.
If FIH.U can manage a few home runs - the returns are potentially astounding. I believe they are already showing much promise.
The risk of waiting on this is like letting the horse leave the gate then trying to mount it and win the race.... While there is nothing wrong with that,
I've opted to get on now ::)