Viking

Yes, it was disappointing to see Vancouver lose. However, I do not think the Canucks need to psychoanalyze things too much. They had a great season and they have a great team; they proved that in spades this year. The bottom line is the Stanley Cup is a marathon and the teams are so close in talent the winners need to have depth and hope the injury bug does not bite too hard. Vancouver was playing without Hamhuis (top D), Rome (top 6 D), Samuelson (top 6 forward and PP guy), Raymond (top 6 forward), Malhotra (3rd line & top face off guy) came back in game 2 from eye injury but clearly was not at his best; others had severe injuries (Erhoff - top 4 D- 2 broken fingers), Kesler (2nd line centre - groin?) etc. And yes, Boston was banged up too (Horton out etc) so both sides had adversity. Marchand was the player from Boston I was most impressed with; Boston was the better team.

Jobs in his key note explains things very clearly: 1.) 10 years ago Apple had the vision that the PC would be the digit hub for consumers: where they would store and access their music, photo and video. 2.) given the proliferation of devices (smartphones, tablets, laptops, desktops, game consols AND FUTURE DEVICES) the PC as the digital hub is terribly inefficient. 3.) starting now 'the cloud' will be the new digital hub and any content you own will be available to any device you have. By moving your hard drive to 'the cloud' you also enable any number of new devices (in your car, in your kitchen, in your living room etc). Do you think Apple has interesting new devices to launch once 'the cloud' is in place to drive consumers to their brand? This is why Microsoft is moving to one interface with Windows 8 (same swipe motion for smartphone, tablet, computer AND FUTURE DEVICES). To me the specific details of what Apple has announced are noise. The real news is they are officially launching the move of the consumer's digital hub from the PC to the cloud. Game on. My guess is there will be lots of winners as this happens (i.e. like MSFT, Corning etc). Globe & Mail explanation: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/tech-news/apple-sets-sights-on-cloud-control/article2049641/?from=sec501

What is a little surprising to me is how BRK is selling off at the same time it appears insurance/re-insurance rates may be in the process of hardening. Lets hope both those trends continue (as I only have a small position in BRK and would be happy to make it larger). :)

Over the past 10 years MSFT has continued to grow earnings at a pretty decent pace. Bottom line is the business has become more valuable each year. Moving forward earnings growth may slow but should still be positive. MSFT has lots of irons in the fire and looks to be positioned reasonably well to benefit from future changes. The multiple (what Mr Market is willing to pay for MSFT) has compressed over the past 10 years. Probably felt like a value trap for those who bought at higher prices in 1998. Should management continue to grow earnings I have a hard time seeing how the multiple continues to compress (only possible in my mind if the whole market sells off aggresively).

Appears to me that we are in uncharted territory; I wonder if the EU has the ability to sort out Greek/Irish/Portugal debt problems. Regarding Greece, it is clear to me the country will not go much further down the austerity road (i.e. slash spending, increase taxes); at least it will not do this on its own. Looks to me that the only real solution is for Greece to leave the EU and then to pull an Iceland. Problem with this solution is Ireland and Portugal would likely not be far behind. Perhaps the EU will do what the US did and first bail out the banks and then reduce the loan balances. Hard to see how this is solved without a severe shock to the system.

Here is an interesting perspective looking at Google Chrome and its possible impact on Windows. Summary: "Maybe some very cost-conscious schools and businesses might force users to switch to Chrome, but for the vast majority, as long as Office is not challenged, neither is Windows." http://mobileopportunity.blogspot.com/2011/05/can-googles-chromebook-break-windows.html

Yes, prices are high. The real driver is low interest rates. You can get a fixed 5 year rate for about 3.5%. $700,000 house; $140,000 down; $560,000 mortgage. Interest on interest payment = $19,600/year = $1,633/month. Most families can easily afford this amount. Also, to afford to live in the Lower Mainland many families have 'adjusted' and both spouses work (two incomes) and many, many houses have suites that are rented out to generate extra income to help pay the mortgage. Until commodities correct and unemployment increases or interest rates increase my guess is the market goes sideways (perhaps fpr 10 years). With inflation of 2 to 3% per year prices will come back into line. Having said the above, prices in Vancouver have always been at the peak in Canada and also have been VERY volatile (over decades) so people should not be surprised should prices decline substantially (or not).

Products the company has recently launched: Windows 7, Office 2010, Server R2, Kinect, Bing, Azure cloud, Windows 7 mobile. These launches are not pipe dreams; they are in the marketplace and most actually have exceeded performance expectations and will drive increased profitability in the near term. Looks pretty impressive to me. Regarding the cash, yes, I also struggle with how to value it. What I do like with MSFT is they do pay a decent (growing) dividend and also do meaningful buybacks every year (reducing share count) = 5 or 6% per year.

MSFT looks to be in the midst of its greatest new product cycle in recent memory. They also look to be poised to compete very well in the 'cloud'; further, their deal with Nokia looks to only have upside. The bottom line is over the past year the 'story' has gotten better and the stock has gotten much cheaper than it was a year ago (when I started this post), especially for a Canadian investor. Here is a recent (long) Q&A with their CFO: www.microsoft.com/investor/Downloads/Events/MorganStanley_Peter_Klein_030211.docx Here is a comparison of what I posted a year ago and how things look today... solid outperformance! May 27, 2010 May 13, 2011 Price = $26.00 $25.03 May 27, 2010 Est May 13, 2011 2010 Earnings Est = $2.05 to $2.10 Actual = $2.11 2011 Earnings Est = $2.20 New Est = $2.63 Dividend = $0.52 = 2% New Div = $0.64 = 2.6% Cash on hand = $5.00 per share Same with aggressive share repurchases Can$ = $0.95 $1.03

I do like articles that look at things from an historical perspective. Bottom line, accurately precicting the timing of large market changes in direction is pretty much impossible. In the coming months it will be interesting to see what the end of QE2 will do to stocks, bonds, commodities, US$ etc (if anything). At the present time, Mr Market apparently sees no big problems... everything is OK; move along please!

I hope you are all able to let this one go and continue to post. Unfortunate misunderstanding. We need more ideas on this board not less. I have a lot of respect for those who take the time to post an idea (it is not as simple as it looks) and we absolutely MUST NOT call a person out; Sanj can deal with outlier events and that is his role as moderator. I post a fair bit on this board; some posts are on the mark and some are not (this is one way that I learn about an investment). If another poster questioned my integrity or accused me of pumping an idea (i.e. RIM lately :'() my immediate reaction would likely be to want to exit the board. The teacher appears when the student is ready. Not the other way around. Because someone does not agree and/or understand our opinion does not mean they are up to no good; regardless we are all responsible for our own due dilligence in the end.

Simple for me; "No"

I am not a fan of minority governments. They result in frequent elections. And as we all know, an important part of getting elected is to make lots of (expensive) promises. In the old days we had inflation (with election promises); with constant elections and minority governments we have hyper inflation. Over time our strong fiscal position will be eroded. I much prefer that one party get a majority and a 4 year mandate to govern; early in their term they can make the hard (necessary) decisions. If they abuse things they will get voted out after 4 years. I am not a fan of proportionate representation (like many European countries). My fear is you simply would get interest group politics (i.e. special interests) running the agenda and an even more disfunctional political system than the current minority system. We would have more regional parties (the Block is good for Canada?) and ethnic parties would also likely form; given our crazy diversity I am not sure we would like what we got. Having said all the above, the Conservatives have had every opportunity to build a stronger coalition and easily obtain a majority. Unfortunately, they are so focussed on keeping their base happy they keep pissing everyone else off. If they do not get a majority they only have themselves to blame. My guess is Jack Layton may well be the next Prime Minister. The Conservatives will get the most seats and will be asked to form the next government; not sure if the Block will have enough seats to help the conservatives to a majority. If not, the NDP and Liberals may actually form the next government. If it looks like this may happen watch Bay Street have a heart attack (as the NDP platform is built on repealing the Conservative tax breaks to businesses). Monday may be quite the historic event in Canadian politics.

Canada's economic situation looks quite good if resources are your business. With the CAN$ increasing from $0.62 to $1.03 I am not sure how manufacturers are coping (who tend to be in Ontario & Quebec). My guess is the manufacturing base will continue to shrink is size. Being Canadian, currency has been my greatest challenge as an investor. I have a hard time investing in commodity companies (who can forecast what is going to happen to commofity prices)? Over the past year I have been gravitating to large cap US companies where 8 to 10% returns look pretty reasonable; the challenge is the CAN$ appreciation is offsetting the gains of a basket of US stocks. How much higher do board members see the CAN$ going? I see it perhaps increasing to $1.10 over the next year... but wonder at what point to Canadian manufactuers throw in the towel.

I think Canadian economic prospects are firmly tied to what happens in China. I think China is still early in its development so the resource sector in Canada will continue do well (with expected ups and downs). China looks to me to have another 10 or 20 years of strong growth ahead of it. As the Canadian dollar continues to climb it is hurting the manufacturing base in Ontario/Quebec (my guess is it is shrinking). I am not saying "this time is different". We have a country with a population of over 1 billion people rapidly industrializing... when was the last time that happened in the last 200 years? All this tells me is the current commodity cycle may get a little more frothy than past cycles. Will it correct at some point? Of course. Bubbles are possible to predict; timing of the bursting is pretty much impossible to predict. Being Canadian, the persistent strength in the Canadian dollar is hurting my US$ investments. As a result I am now looking for a higher margin of safety when purchasing non CAN$ assets to protect against a strong currency. My guess is the current trend will continue and the CAN$ will continue to go higher over the next year or two.

I am looking into Cameco or an index that tracks the uramium producers. The current situation reminds me of last year after the Horizon sinking and the backlash that hit everything oil. Most importantly, China is the primary driver of new nuclear plants and I do not see them slowing down at all as a result of this (yes, they likely will posture to drive uranium pricing lower). Scroll to the bottom of the link to see a summary of who has facilities and who is biulding. www.euronuclear.org/info/encyclopedia/n/nuclear-power-plant-world-wide.htm

I think FFH wants to get into the public domain all the material involved with this story as it paints a very poor picture of the hedge funds involved. They are highly secretive and hate bad press. Unfortunately, this is the best one can do in situations like this. FFH understands there is a low probability of collecting cash.

Q1 and Q4 are 'normally' the quarters insurers/re-insurers make their money... could be an intesting year should catastrophes in Q2 and Q3 (i.e. hurricanes) also come in on the high end.

Is this an industry wide issue? TEVA has also had similar issues.

Given the extreme level of government (i.e. fed) involvement in financial markets I am having a hard time making sense of things. I underestimated the markets reaction to Quatitative Easing by the fed; seems reasonable to me to expect some downside risk when fed announces it is done. Lots of nervous people with itchy trigger fingers...

I have always enjoyed reading Montier's stuff but I think I liked this article the most... he seems to have distilled Graham, Buffett, Keynes and Templeton thinking into his 7 laws. And then he overlays this into what we are seeing in the markets today. Bottom line... he says likely a good time to raise some cash and be patient and wait for the next fat pitch.

zippy1, I still (5 years later) struggle a little with explaining to people what I do in a way they can understand. Most are so financially illiterate that they are not able to understand; I am sure many think I must have some 'under the table' income that I am not telling them about. It is also hard because we are always heavily involved in our kids activities (coaching, managing, sitting on various executives etc) and we see how time starved most people are; I also do not want to come accross as being boastful or Mr Perfect with all sorts of time on my hands. I find talking to people about 'work' to be a fine line to walk. I have also learned over the years that when you make big decisions the 'problems' are relatively easy to pick out. I have also learned over the years that many 'unintended positive outcomes' happen that are not contemplated when the big decision is being contemplated (versus only a few 'unintended negative outcomes'). This tells me that if you focus on the big decision and think it through well, if the positives outweight the negatives then it likely is a go (and the positive unintended consequences that subsequently happen make the decision a slam dunk a few years later). I am reading Hill's 'Think and Grow Rich' classic and it sounds very much like your thought process creates your reality (not the other way around). I think this is an important factor in the net worth number that people come up with when considering 'retiring'.

shalab, this is actually the only issue I have encountered. The key is what both spouses do with their time. If you are both in the house all day long, yes, friction easily develops. It is also hard to keep a relationship 'fresh' when you are with each other too much of the time. The key is to have enough outside/different interests that each of you get out of the house each day. One thing I do is print much of my reading (i.e. companies I am invested in) and head to any number of local Starbucks to relax and read (I like to print most reports as I highlight stuff and write comments in margins etc). I much better appreciate what retired couples go through...

Erciopoly, interesting question; a topic I have also thought about. My kids are 10, 8 & 7 and I have not 'worked' for the past 5 years (my wife since our first was born). Fortunately, I was in sales/management for two large multinational companies and my kids know what my last job was and the products I sold (we eat them every day). They also understand my current job is 'managing our investments' which has lead to a number of questions and discussions. My wife and I are both very involved in many not for profit organizations (sport/school) coaching, organizing etc so we are quite busy with the kids. Bottom line, the kids can see our work ethic; we just don't hop in the car each morning. We also likely have more time to talk about 'work stuff' with them than most parents (too busy'stressed out with other things). I guess the key is how much time you are able to spend with your kids and what you are doing with them. I definitely wouldn't change anything about the past 5 years. Let's hope the next 5 are as good! :-)

This board has had a life changing impact for me and my family. FFH has been over the years a literal gold mine. Thank you to Sanj and the many individuals who have taken the time over the years to post (bsilly and many more come to mind). Funny what life serves up when you decide to board the train...