rkbabang

The size of the estate shouldn't matter. Depends on what your goal is. If you intend to limit one individual from being given too much, then it should be an inheritance tax instead of an estate tax. $10m inherited by an only child is very different from $20m inherited by 8 children (4 of them spouses) and 14 grandchildren (22 people all put together). It's not a dynasty when you inherit less than a million! $20m may look like a lot, but it really only matters how much each person is actually getting IMO. +1 and anything left to charity should be tax free, so someone with $20M could leave $1M each to 10 people and $10M to charity. Anything that keeps it out of the hands of the politicians is a good thing.

It's bizarre. I've been wondering myself for years why Google Finance didn't just zoom past Yahoo! like it did everything else. I always wondered the same thing. Now I'm wondering why Yahoo would remove the one feature that differentiated it from all of its competitors and made it useful. Bizarre indeed. I don't get it.

Yuk, you know what that looks like in 40 years? 35% tax all income - Including capital gains, dividends, gifts with tons of exceptions, graduations, loopholes, deductions, all with complicated rules (see current tax code) 8.5% federal tax on all liquid assets and real estate with tons of exceptions, loopholes, deductions, complications etc 10.5% VAT on all goods and services with tons of exceptions, loopholes, complications, etc Get rid of cash - Everything must be done electronically (the ultimate surveillance/police state, see: Orwell, George, "1984") $2k tax credit per dependent with complicated rules and income limitations Family of 4 with a 400k house, 1M in liquid assets, making 180k per year pays much more than 26k in taxes. Family of 2 making 50k pays much more than $3600 (same as FICA now) Businesses- 45% Tax on all income (minus allowable expenses) with complicated rules, loopholes, deductions, exceptions, etc... 20.5% of all liquid assets and real estate with complicated rules, loopholes, deductions, exceptions, etc... 2% tax credit on payroll + benefits up to 12k per employee with complicated rules, loopholes, deductions, exceptions, etc... End result more taxes paid, more man-hours spent figuring out multiple different types of taxes, 10X worse off than we are now. At least if you make it one type of tax and simple, the worse that can happen is that it becomes complicated again and needs another reset.

How can anyone look at the current tax code and the enormous number of man-hours american citizens and corporations waste complying with it and not think that something drastic needs to be done? Rand Paul isn't even half the Libertarian his father is, but in many areas I agree with him, he's far and away better than the Clinton's, Bush's, and other candidates who spend hundred's of thousands of taxpayer's dollars gouging their fat faces on food.

Does google finance still not support options? Has anyone tried any of the software packages? Such as: http://www.investmentaccountmanager.com/ Most of the other online portfolio sites I can find work like Mint where it accesses your accounts directly and downloads info. These usually don't show you or report cost basis info. And they don't continuously update the quotes in real time during the day like yahoo does.

Oops, how could I forget the world famous Hutzler 571 Banana Slicer.

Perhaps http://www.amazon.com/Tuscan-Whole-Milk-Gallon-128/dp/B00032G1S0 or this http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001SNVXYA/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_dp_ss_3?pf_rd_p=1944687562&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=B00032G1S0&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0TDC96EFZAK69FX9QQ58 Thanks, I've seen the milk one, but I never saw the toilet seat ebook before. These are good as well: Accoutrements Yodelling Pickle The Mountain Three Wolf Moon Short Sleeve Tee Uranium Ore Sharp, Provolone Piccante Cheese (Whole Wheel) Approximately 60 Lbs

I've been using Yahoo Finance Portfolios feature to track my portfolio for a long time, I've got every trade I've made since August of 2000 in there and now today I get a popup which says: I guess I need to find some other way to easily track my portfolio. Many of the other free online options don't do foreign stocks, pinksheets, or options. Yahoo worked rather well until today, it even did bitcoin.

I buy a lot on Amazon and usually find the reviews helpful. You kind of have to filter them a bit though. For good reviews you can sometimes tell they have only used the product for a short amount of time and probably don't have much experience with it yet. I always take those "VINE" payed reviews with a grain of salt as well. For negative reviews I ignore the reviews that sound like the person writing the review is an idiot and bought the wrong product or couldn't figure out how to use it. I also ignore the "I got it and it was broken" or "There was an important part missing" type reviews because if that happens to me Amazon makes returns fairly easy. And you can sometimes tell the reviewer doesn't like the product and has all kinds of nasty things to say about it but hasn't purchased it or used it. This happens with books a lot, where someone disagrees politically with an author and will write a trashy review on a book without reading it. For a product that has a small number of reviews you probably need to be cautious about taking them as gospel, but for products with a large number of reviews you can usually get a feel for what the average person's experience with it is. What was your experience which prompted this poll? This?

What year will Uber go completely driverless? My prediction 2027.

Yes this is going to ruffle a lot of feathers, there are probably more political issues to overcome than technical ones at this point.

That is hilarious. The major car companies will be the last ones to invest in anything that changes the status quo. If you are under 70 years old you will live to see all of these companies go out of business. They will never even produce a viable electric vehicle, never mind an autonomous one. They will never abandon their ICE vehicle/dealership model with anything that will change how they do business. The last thing they want is for autonomous vehicles to cause fewer cars to be sold. Thus the other large impediment to autonomous vehicles will be political pressure by the existing auto manufacturers (except Tesla) and dealerships. We already see the dealerships wielding their political muscle trying to stop Tesla from selling their products to people who want them (to protect the consumer of course :P).

The mining industry is the perfect industry for this, because the trucks don't have to deal with human drivers. The most difficult part of getting autonomous cars on the roads is going to be dealing with human driven vehicles doing stupid things. I know when I first got my license I was taught the rules of the road, but what no one told me is that other people don't follow these rules. I got in a number of accidents before I realized that you just have to assume that the people around you are going to do asinine/totally insane things. I rear-ended an old lady once that was stopping on a busy street (45mph speed limit) to let someone pull out of his driveway. I was almost killed recently by an 18-wheeler blowing through a red light at full speed a long time after my side turned green. If I hadn't waited and looked after my light turned green my daughter and I would have both been killed. I can't wait for autonomous vehicles. The more humans it gets off the road the better. Driving is one thing the majority human beings are not good at and many thousands of people die every year as a result. It cracks me up when people say that they are afraid of the safety of autonomous vehicles.

There will certainly be people who own their own vehicle, but I think this will be at the wealthier end of the spectrum. For most people it won't make sense. Even for people who can afford it many will opt not to bother. If you work 50 miles from home does it really make sense to have your car bring you to work then drive 50 miles back home empty to drive your kids to school, then drive 50 miles empty at the end of the day to pick you back up? I think that as much as people above a certain age like driving and owning cars, it is more of a cultural thing that will not last very long (especially with younger people) if the economics doesn't make sense. My son is 15 and I was talking with him about it and it'd be fine with him if driverless cars were available now and he never had to learn how to drive. He'd rather watch youtube and let the car take him where he wants to go. Sort of like now with me driving :) Younger people simply don't have the same cultural attachment to cars and driving that people over 35 have. I agree with you for the most part but I think there will be things that slow it down. First off public transportation just isn't as comfortable or clean as most people prefer their own vehicles to be. I think most of us would prefer to ride in our own cars over a typical taxi. People prefer their own space to communal spaces. Many a soccer mom will choose to transport their kids in a known clean vehicle than risk whatever disease the previous occupants of the week may have had. Many people have hobbies or work requirements that a fleet of vehicles will be slower to provide. Hauling golf carts, four wheelers, kayaks, bicycles, home improvement supplies, and pets, and landscaping all to some degree require special equipment that will require specialized services. Certainly niche services will provide some of these, but there will always be atypical transportation needs. We also enjoy the level of customization that comes with our own vehicles. Always having the seats adjusted just the way you like it, the presets on the radio, and other little creature comforts like heated seats. I also think working from a car would be much easier if it's customized to your liking. Not to mention entertainment I can imagine cars set up with wraparound IMAX type of entertainment systems or whatever else is used for entertainment in the future. I think the tremendous savings will make penetration over 50% and will cause virtually every family to use them some. But I think the best correlation is probably traveling commercial vs. a private jet. Most of us can't afford a private jet, but the private car will be much more attainable for the middle class and possibly just as desired as the private jet is for the wealthy. I think you are correct it will always be better to own your own (I'd love a private jet) and for us who already own multiple vehicles, having only one will save us a ton of money already. I'm just thinking about the average younger person who comes of age in the age of driverless cars. As a college student then a young professional, then starting a family, buying a home, etc, there may always be something better to spend tens of thousands of dollars on than a private vehicle. I tend to think private ownership will be an expensive luxury that many will aspire to, but fewer and fewer will be able to justify. I think transportation companies will have different levels of service (think Uber black) that will guarantee nicer vehicles and state of the art entertainment. Why buy your own which will be obsolete in 3 years, when the nicer car service companies always have the latest rides? Have a car with a desk pick you up if you want to work, have a car with a wrap around screen pick you and the kids up for a long trip. Have a small car bring you to the hardware store and have a truck pick you up from the hardware store (or better yet have a truck pick up what you ordered from the hardware store and meet you in your driveway without you ever leaving home). Same with the grocery store, you order the stuff you need online and have a vehicle go pick it up for you. It will certainly be interesting to see what actually happens.

There will certainly be people who own their own vehicle, but I think this will be at the wealthier end of the spectrum. For most people it won't make sense. Even for people who can afford it many will opt not to bother. If you work 50 miles from home does it really make sense to have your car bring you to work then drive 50 miles back home empty to drive your kids to school, then drive 50 miles empty at the end of the day to pick you back up? I think that as much as people above a certain age like driving and owning cars, it is more of a cultural thing that will not last very long (especially with younger people) if the economics doesn't make sense. My son is 15 and I was talking with him about it and it'd be fine with him if driverless cars were available now and he never had to learn how to drive. He'd rather watch youtube and let the car take him where he wants to go. Sort of like now with me driving :) Younger people simply don't have the same cultural attachment to cars and driving that people over 35 have.

"Driving in the Networked Age" by Reid Hoffman

Sort of... you can't tell it how fast you plan on driving and then have it plan the proper route for you. It can set you out down a path and then only later tell you that you won't make it unless you slow down. It's not quite what they advertise it to be. What would be nice is if the computer learned how fast you typically drive on certain roads at certain times of the day, and use that info to get better and better at planning your routes. It could also use the info to predict how fast you are likely to drive on roads that you have never driven on yet using your past driving on similar types of roads. Also use facial recognition to have a profile for every driver of the car and plan the route based on who will be driving. Maybe even have an option to tell it "I'm in a hurry" or "No rush I won't be driving as fast today".

I agree with you, I'm just not willing to put a guess on the time frame. I hope you are correct.

Of course, but it is still possible to make some reasonable predictions. I think car usage would increase dramatically, but the number of insured cars would be much less than now. You wouldn't need 2-4 cars per family anymore, a transportation company could serve thousands or tens of thousands of people with hundreds of cars. Also while people will always prefer riding in cars rather than trains/buses, there is still the fact that if everyone wants to get to work by 9AM the roads will be congested in the morning. Autonomous cars can ride closer together and do not rubber neck accidents on the other side of the highway, or freak out because they saw a break light in front of them, but there is still a limit to how much traffic a road can handle before things slow down. And all it takes is one or two human drivers on the road to screw everything up. I wonder if human drivers will even be allowed? I don't think we will be completely rid of traffic (which means some people will still use public transportation such as commuter rail) until we have autonomous flying people carriers. There is plenty of room in the air to carry everyone where they want to go if the machines are smart enough not to crash into each other. Also there might still be room for long distance bus/train transportation for cost reasons. I'm sure it will be much cheaper to take a bus from Boston to NYC than a car. Especially if the car company doesn't operate in both locations. Things this will kill is roadside gas stations, airport transportation companies, taxis, intra-city buses/subways.

Why not just wait for the new Roadster in 4 years... http://i.stack.imgur.com/mNA4dm.jpg

Short term not much, longer term 10-30 years, I think the entire industry will change significantly. I don't think the economics will favor owning your own car for 98+% of people. A car is a huge expense and spends the vast majority of its life sitting in a driveway, garage or parking lot while it depreciates. If you could quickly and easily get a car to pick you up (in minutes) and only pay for the time you actually spend inside one that just seems to make more economic sense. Therefore what insurance companies will be insuring is the corporate fleets of the large car sharing companies.

Looked at MIDD a couple years ago, really liked the ROIC, ended up passing. Obviously I should have bought :) Congrats on your successful long-term investment! Thanks. I just looked it up I first bought it in 2005, so I guess it has been 10 years not 12. I bought it for $44 ($7.33 split adjusted), increased my position further in 2008 by converting it all to OVEN right before the buyout which reduced my cost basis even further, then sold the bulk of it unfortunately around a split adjusted $33. I still have enough that it is 8% of my portfolio today, but I should never have sold.

Speaking of MIDD: U.K. Stovemaker Aga Sells to Middleby to Escape Pension Hole "For Middleby, the acquisition will provide “meaningful growth opportunities,” Chief Executive Officer Selim Bassoul said in the statement. Middleby has spent about $2.8 billion on deals since Bassoul took over as CEO in 2004. Its stock price has jumped more than tenfold in that period, valuing the Elgin, Illinois-based company at about $6.8 billion."

I've owned MIDD for about 12 years. It's a serial acquirer, does an excellent job integrating the acquisitions, cutting out the fat, finding and creating value every time.

That seems to be what most people are assuming and that assumption alone could drive up the price due to speculation. I think bitcoin will continue to be volatile and subject to large swings until it is more widely used.