Jump to content

Parsad

Administrators
  • Posts

    12,597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Parsad last won the day on April 11

Parsad had the most liked content!

About Parsad

  • Birthday July 4

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Parsad's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Well Followed Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

52

Reputation

  1. I never said that you were hypocritical in condemning genocide. I said let's not get too self-righteous in suggesting where we see genocide, since western history is replete with acts of genocide and in massive scales. In my opinion, there is a difference between war crimes and genocide. Almost every war will produce acts categorized as war crimes...whereas every war crime is not necessarily genocide. But you are right...this discussion is probably exhausted. Cheers!
  2. Define what you mean by "real economy"? Manufacturing today is an extremely commoditized industry with lower margins compared to yesteryear. If that is what you define as the "real economy" then most of the Magnificent 7 would not exist. China excelled at manufacturing for several decades because they had the cheapest labor. That isn't the case any more. It is why capital is flowing to other countries, including even the U.S. Combine that with political risk, property seizures, non-transparent accounting and reporting, difficulty moving capital out of China and lack of an equitable court system...no wonder capital is fleeing China. Cheers!
  3. The West...Britain, France, United States, Germany. There's enough spilt blood by most countries, so any self-righteous stance is demeaning to any real debate. Cheers!
  4. When you've committed genocide 3-4 times...you've pretty much written the playbook...doesn't matter what era! Cheers!
  5. I think the next 50-100 years may be the most economically profitable and exciting years in the history of mankind. Technology will continue to create efficiencies that feed a continuously growing population and generate profits exceeding what humanity will actually need or use...almost a utopian society! Or we blow ourselves up! It's one or the other. Cheers!
  6. Not really. It's the same demise of the U.S. we've been hearing about since the 1970's. Yet the only global superpower to retain their status during those 55 years has been the U.S. And they remain the powerhouse in almost all aspects of the future technological economy. Yes, the quality of life in many regions and growth in the middle class has occurred especially Asia, but the quality of life in the United States remains excellent, while they remain the world's #1 economic and military superpower. Coke has always had a Pepsi next to it...but Coke has always remained #1! Cheers!
  7. I agree with most of your post...but I think it is far too premature to call the West a "waning global power". Cheers!
  8. I don't agree with most of Luca's views on China...but let's not get too self-righteous. The West has perpetrated far more atrocities in its short history than China has done in 5,000 years! Cheers!
  9. One, you cannot ignore the 2nd largest economy in the world if you invest globally. Two, other than Buffett & Munger, those guys all copy each other. Over the last two years, investment managers and hedge funds have been pulling capital out of China not allocating capital to it. Political and property risk, combined with a lack of transparency, means a reduced position in most portfolios compared to the past. Cheers!
  10. +1! Yup, absolutely. Market risk is not something she needs at 92. A portion in an annuity locking in that income, the rest in redeemable GIC's laddered is probably the best solution. Cheers!
  11. Congratulations to Prem! Truly well deserved. Cheers!
  12. +1! I think they've added tremendous value to their investment return on the bond side...Brian has definitely added significant alpha. On the equities side, I think they would have done fine as well if they had stayed away from the short positions, etc. But because of those macro bets, just buying the S&P 500 would have given the same return or better on the equity side. With Wade leading the way on the equity side going forward, I think you'll start to see better returns. But we may not do as well on the fixed income side when Brian is gone. Regardless, with the leverage Fairfax uses in float and debt, they don't need homeruns...just doubles and triples...to hit that 15% ROE. Cheers!
  13. Parsad

    China

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-city-zhengzhou-tells-state-055850040.html Cheers!
  14. Prem told me that they will be putting "Doing Good By Doing Well" on the website at some point. Look forward to reading it! Cheers!
×
×
  • Create New...