txlaw Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/915191/000119312513059881/d487003d13fhr.txt Edit: Link was broken, but now it's fixed. To me, the most interesting move is the increase in XCO, which I own.
berkshiremystery Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/915191/00011931251305 To me, the most interesting move is the increase in XCO, which I own. Not sure,... at least your URL seems not to work on my iPad,... ERROR 404: File Not Found You are receiving this error message because your browser tried to reach a page or location that does not exist on this site. I might post the SEC CIK link for FFH.... http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000915191&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0
fareastwarriors Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/915191/00011931251305 To me, the most interesting move is the increase in XCO, which I own. Link doesn't work for me either. and I own XCO too me. :D
nwoodman Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Dataroma Link http://www.dataroma.com/m/holdings.php?m=FFH
berkshiremystery Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Updated the link. Don't worry,... :) I made bigger mistakes today with muddle up 3G :-[
berkshiremystery Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Dataroma Link http://www.dataroma.com/m/holdings.php?m=FFH Only dataroma seems already running behind the actual reported numbers for SD.... ...the newest SEC filings showed 62,274,656 shares in SD, while dataroma only 32,463,200 shares.... http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/915191/000119312513059343/d486660dsc13ga.htm
nwoodman Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Dataroma is correct based on the 13F. However as you rightly point out the 13G filing is almost twice as much. The entities relating to the 13G filing are: 1. This statement is being jointly filed by the following persons (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”): 2. V. Prem Watsa, an individual; 3. 1109519 Ontario Limited (“1109519”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ontario; 4. The Sixty Two Investment Company Limited (“Sixty Two”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of British Columbia; 5. 810679 Ontario Limited (“810679”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ontario; 6. Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (“Fairfax”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada; 7. Fairfax (US) Inc. (“Fairfax US”), a Delaware corporation; and 8. Odyssey Reinsurance Company (“Odyssey”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Connecticut. Any clues as to how you can have such vastly different amounts between filings considering Sixty Two and Ontario are Prem's vehicles for his Fairfax shares? Cheers nwoodman
rijk Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 62 million shares includes common equivalent of pfds? regards rijk
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now