PlanMaestro Posted October 11, 2012 Share Posted October 11, 2012 From BCG http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8185/8075805609_4ea929b1bb.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanMaestro Posted October 11, 2012 Author Share Posted October 11, 2012 Total shareholder return 2007-2011 by country http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8194/8075791999_9be5e96971.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharperDingaan Posted October 11, 2012 Share Posted October 11, 2012 If you accept that banking is cyclical, look closer at the Canadian Sched-A Banks. If you accept that over the long-term, bank dividends should grow by (inflation + GDP)x leverage x payout ratio; it gets even better. Accept that the Canadian regulator largely assures they will seldom be leading edge, & that the $C is actually a petro-currency - & it gets better still. Worst kept secret in Canada ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meiroy Posted October 11, 2012 Share Posted October 11, 2012 In some countries the declared ROE is completely fake. There should be a similar chart describing the quality of the data according to countries, wonder how that would look like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treasurehunt Posted October 11, 2012 Share Posted October 11, 2012 Assuming the numbers are reliable, there are a couple of shockers here for me: 1) Japanese banks had an ROE of 7.3% from 2007 to 2011. This is much higher than I would have guessed. Maybe this implies that US banks will do okay even in a prolonged low-rate environment with global instability? 2) The return on Spanish banks from 2007 to 2011 is better than the return on US banks during the same period. I would have guessed that US banks did better than Spanish banks over this period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanMaestro Posted October 11, 2012 Author Share Posted October 11, 2012 Assuming the numbers are reliable, there are a couple of shockers here for me: 1) Japanese banks had an ROE of 7.3% from 2007 to 2011. This is much higher than I would have guessed. Maybe this implies that US banks will do okay even in a prolonged low-rate environment with global instability? 2) The return on Spanish banks from 2007 to 2011 is better than the return on US banks during the same period. I would have guessed that US banks did better than Spanish banks over this period. 1) And their cost of capital was way low, so a 7% is not bad at all ... they should be worth at least book value 2) Spanish banks are mainly composed of Santander and BBVA that have huge international operation that have been softening the blows in Spain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now