rkbabang Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 and purposely had at least one misspelled word. Purposely misspelling words? I'm sorry, this baffles me. I like the concept of not spending a lot on an expensive editor or on an expensive website designer, but I'm more impressed with someone who creates a nice product on the cheap rather than someone who purposefully degrades the product for the appearance alone. This is expending extra effort to make the product worse. Of corse, maybe im rong and mispeling is more bettr, and using screen real estate inefficient- ly is better too. But I don't think so. You don't need to spend any more time nor money to make something easier to read and run a spell check before you print. Saving time and/or money I get, but I don't get inefficiency for inefficiency's sake. --Eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bookie71 Posted April 21, 2011 Share Posted April 21, 2011 We went out of our way to make it look like we did the letter not a big advertising firm. We also made a donation of $50 to the favorite charity of the first person who spotted it. It got folks to read instead of throwing away. Too many want things flashy instead of practical. When you send out a newsletter, you want it read and hopefully give new info to your clients and prospective clients (and generate new business). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now