villainx Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, giulio said: Having to do 1 post/video a week means DD is going to be shallow I would hard disagree because there should be cumulative knowledge/expertise to rely upon, especially for "sophisticated" investors. But I don't mean to trash too much - end of day, they are entertainment oriented, I guess.
TG Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago 20 minutes ago, SafetyinNumbers said: Large institutional capital is either passive or has to beat the market in the short term. These days that means owning momentum. For a long time owning quality was good enough and that’s what most active investors own and screen for. Fairfax doesn’t pass their screens. I think it’s that simple. What made the market suddenly realize they're amazing at what they're doing post the lost decade? I've only been following FFH for a couple of years so I'd like to understand why all of a sudden the market decided to reward them with an 3x post 2022? I would assume a combination of cheap valuation (below BV) + better investment strategy + higher interest rates + buybacks? I think pre-2022 the coverage and talk about FFH was even lower than it is today. And while many more people are familiar with the name today (maybe in search of a new BRK) so far that hasn't really have much of an effect. Probably the subdued growth due to softening markets leads to many investors skipping it?
dartmonkey Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, villainx said: I would hard disagree because there should be cumulative knowledge/expertise to rely upon, especially for "sophisticated" investors. But I don't mean to trash too much - end of day, they are entertainment oriented, I guess. You're maybe going a little too easy on them - if I want entertainment, I would hardly listen to a spiel about a boring insurance company as an investment. And if you are going to do a serious service to investors, you have to at least get some basic facts straight like the ticker, where the major earnings are from, the threats and opportunities, basic details about the big holdings like Eurobank, Poseidon and Sleep Country and, if you have to mention something like Metlen with its P/E of 0.20 (which is actually a P/E of 20), fine, but get it right, especially if you have checked it twice (how do you do that, and still get it wrong?!) As Viking says, it just goes to show that Fairfax is not easy for most retail investors. Here's a much better effort, from Whitney Tilson, today: https://stansberryresearch.com/whitney-tilsons-daily/two-pitches-for-fairfax-financial
djokovic1 Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago (edited) Yeah I like Whitney’s daily summaries. He was there at the Italy conference (he co-hosts it), he liked my Fairfax pitch and wanted to share it in his newsletter. Interestingly, He had owned the stock before 2007-2009 when he ran a fund. But hadn’t looked at it post lost decade. I think that’s quite common ie to dismiss FFH after 10 years of poor performance (I did it too). Edited 1 minute ago by djokovic1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now